Case law

Peck v. Standard Parts Co.

295 F. 740 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 27, 1920

Justice Brown. The facts which in the Solomons Case Mr. … See Dielman v. White (C. C.) 102 Fed. 892 . .

Talwar v. Mercer County Joint Township Community Hospital

520 F. Supp. 2d 894 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 2007

Id. at 668, 695 N.E.2d 1233 (citing Jacobs v. … Sugarbaker v.

Lytle v. Potter

480 F. Supp. 2d 986 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 6, 2006

Defendants Kenton-Hardin County Board of Health and David Zeller, the Board’s Director of Environmental Health, move for partial judgment on the pleadings. … Group v.

Forbes v. Wilson

243 F. 264 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 7, 1917

These considerations bring the case within the rule of Doctor v. Harrington, 196 U. S. 579, 588 , 25 Sup. Ct. 355, 49 L. Ed. 606 : Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany, etc., R. R. Co., 213 U. S. 435 , 29 Sup. Ct. 540, 53 L. … Jur. 616, 617, 716, 717; Morris & Co. v. Whitley, 183 Fed. 764 , 106 C. C. A. 206 .

Reed v. Rhodes

472 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 14, 1979

the relief requested of Justice Rehnquist in Columbus Board of Education v. … See Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, 363 F.2d 206 (4th Cir. 1966).

Wedding v. University of Toledo

884 F. Supp. 253 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 9, 1995

In E.E.O.C. v. … See Id. at 431 (“[t]o hold for the Board would allow it to deter its employees from their exercise of their ADEA rights by imposing adverse employment consequences”); see also E.E.O.C. v.

North Olmsted Chamber of Commerce v. City of North Olmsted

86 F. Supp. 2d 755 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 21, 2000

Bulletin boards, organizational signs, and information signs are banned in business districts. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 778 F.2d 35, 43-44 (C.A.D.C. 1985), neither the Supreme Court nor the Sixth Circuit' — this Court's polestars — has so decided. Justice Blackmun, in Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v.

Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

970 F. Supp. 1289 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 20, 1997

United Food and Commercial Workers v. Brown Group, Inc., — U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 1529, 1533 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (citing Northeastern Fla. Chapter of Associated Gen. Contractors v. … Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Okla. v. Brown, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (considering § 1983 excessive force claim).

Cooper v. City of North Olmsted

576 F. Supp. 592 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 29, 1983

; and (3) an application for reconsideration, dismissed by the board on November 5, 1980. … Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corporation, supra, extended Allen v. McCurry to employment discrimination cases.

Fahrenwald v. Cope

38 F.2d 251 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 9, 1930

Amended section 4915 (35 USCA § 63), under which the plaintiffs bring this suit, contemplates a prior decision by the newly created Board of Appeals, adverse to the complainant. So also R. … Moore v. N. Y. Cotton Exchange, 270 U. S. 593 , 46 S. Ct. 367 , 70 L. Ed. 750 , 45 A. L. R. 1370; Cleveland Eng. Co. v. Galion D. M. Truck Co. (D. C.) 243 F. 405 ; Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Champion Ignition Co. (D.

Granada Investments, Inc. v. DWG Corp.

823 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 26, 1993

Liggett Co. v. … In Hoiles v.

Rainey

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 2026

State of Ohio v. Rainey, Erie County C. P. No. 2022 CR 0058. … McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993).

Chang v. University of Toledo

480 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 28, 2007

Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 801 (6th Cir.1996) (holding that the employee’s subjective belief as to why she was terminated fails to satisfy the summary judgment standard). Browning v. … Like the plaintiff in Browning , Dr.

Brinkley v. Houk

866 F. Supp. 2d 747 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 5, 2011

Browne then allowed Brinkley to call his mother on Browne’s cell phone. … While at the station, Brinkley also “[s]aid he was going to kill [Browne]” .and “could do [Browne] like he had done other people.” State v. Brinkley, 105 Ohio St.3d 231, 231-235 , 824 N.E.2d 959 (2005).

DHSC, LLC v. California Nurses Ass'n

189 F. Supp. 3d 701 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 31, 2016

, will be determined by an arbitrator or by the Board. … Louis v. Schnuck Baking Co.

Dixon v. Hunt

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 15, 2021

Norris, Matt Gillum, Todd Friend, and “RIB Board.” … Williams v. Luttrell, 99 F. App’x 705, 707 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing, among authority, Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 64–65 (1986)); Saro v. Brown, 11 F.

Toledo Traction, Light & Power Co. v. Smith

205 F. 643 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 16, 1913

Judge Hammond, in Cæsar v. Capell (C. … Some instances are: Carter v. Fortney (C. C.) 170 Fed. 463 ; Carroll v. C. & O. Coal Agency Co., 124 Fed. 305 , 61 C. C. A. 49 ; Hubbard v. Railway, 200 Fed. 505 , 118 C. C. A. 608 ; Mercantile Co. v. Texas Railway Co.

Durabilt Steel Locker Co. v. Berger Mfg. Co.

21 F.2d 139 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 1, 1927

The reasoning of District Judge Brown accords with my own and is adopted, and will be adhered to until there is an authoritative construction to the contrary. … I agree with District Judge Brown that this exact point was not presented in American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co., and, like him, I am unable to concur in the reasoning of the opinion in the Wire Wheel Corp’n Case.

Miller v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

727 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 9, 1989

Miller v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co., 834 F.2d 556, 560 (6th Cir.1987). … Accordingly, this action is terminated and these matters should properly be raised before the Public Law Board. IT IS SO ORDERED.

In re Brown

85 Ohio Law. Abs. 463 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 1960

Rodejlciet v. Andrews, 74 Ohio St., 104 , followed and approved in Public Finance Co. v. Rowe, 123 Ohio St., 206 . … May v. Henderson, 268 U. S., 111 - 45 S. Ct. 5 A. B. R. (N. S.), 739. * The case of May v.