Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,048 results
1.67s
307 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 1969
Estep v. United States, supra; see Parrott v. United States, 370 F.2d 388, 392 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, Lawrence v. … See Paszel v. Laird, 2 SSLR 3119 (E.D.N.Y. 1969); Lane v. Allen, supra.
Cited 10 timesPublished41 F.2d 81 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 1930
The same thought is expressed by the same court in White v. Brown Shoe Company (C. C. A. 5) 30 F.(2d) 674 (1929). Other authorities to the same effect are: Burlingham v. Crouse, 228 U. S. 459 , 33 S. Ct. 564 , 57 L. … Board of Trade v. Weston, 243 F. 332 , 156 C. C. A. 112 .”
Cited 5 timesPublishedM. H. v. Olmsted Falls City School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 22, 2021
Id. at 970-71; see also Crozier v. Westside Cmty. Sch. … Bass v. Leatherwood, 788 F.3d 228, 230 (6th Cir. 2015); see also Grappell v. Carvalho, 847 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPatrick v. Cleveland Scene Publishing
582 F. Supp. 2d 939 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 20, 2008
Brown v. Lawson, 169 Ohio App.3d 430 , 863 N.E.2d 215, 219 (Ohio Ct.App.2006). … Marcone v. Penthouse Int’l, 754 F.2d 1072 , 1081 n. 4 (3rd Cir.1985); see also Cobb v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLausin Ex Rel. Lausin v. Bishko
727 F. Supp. 2d 610 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 15, 2010
See Graham v. … See Morrison v. Board of Trustees of Green Township, 529 F.Supp.2d 807, 823 (S.D.Ohio 2007).
Cited 18 timesPublishedGenco v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Workers, Local 1005
721 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 27, 1988
Dunleavy v. … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989 (6th Cir.1989) (applying Ohio’s two-year bodily injury statute of limitations to § 1983 suits).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCaroline's Kids Pet Rescue v. Lake Humane Society
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 10, 2022
The Browns were unable to reach an agreement to avoid prosecution and payment of restitution in the amount of $9,000.00 to Lake Humane for the costs of rehabilitation and boarding of the cats. … Inc. v. NW. Bell Tel. Co., 492 U.S. 229, 237–39 (1989). This requirement is known as the “relationship plus continuity” test. See Brown v. Cassens Transp. Co., 546 F.3d 347, 355 (6th Cir. 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHoren v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF TOLEDO
655 F. Supp. 2d 794 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 8, 2009
After the parents' case was removed to this Court, it became denominated Horen v. Board of Education et al., 3:07CV3779 (N.D.Ohio). I dismissed the parents’ appeal on jurisdictional grounds. Horen v. … TPS filed this case, Board of Education of the Toledo City School District v. Horen , 3:07CV3631 (N.D.Ohio), directly in this Court as an appeal from a state administrative decision favoring the parents' child.
Cited 2 timesPublishedYounker v. Board of Education of the Lorain City School District
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 5, 2020
As such, “[i]n legal actions involving the schools, it is the board of education which must be sued.” Wortham v. Akron Pub. Sch., No. 5:08CV233, 2008 WL 762530, at *2 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2008) (quoting Carney v. … V. Conclusion For the reasons set forth above, the Board’s Motion for More Definite Statement (Doc.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDetroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
267 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 12, 1967
In Williams v. … The Board’s services have therefore properly been invoked, and its jurisdiction to mediate should be protected. The case of Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line R. R. v. Brotherhood of R. R.
Cited 7 timesPublishedReich v. Hall Holding Co., Inc.
990 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 1998
Reich v. … Rather, by relying on language in Kuper v.
Cited 61 timesPublishedCrookham v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
489 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 25, 1978
V 1975). … V 1975) (emphasis added). Conrail maintains that section 777 mandates that all Title V disputes must be submitted to the National Railroad Adjustment Board.
Cited 5 timesPublishedGoodsite v. Board of Education of the Norwalk City School District
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 2020
.”); Tucker v. … Wexler v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPatterson v. Heartland Industrial Partners, LLP
225 F.R.D. 204 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 14, 2004
There, an administrative law judge (ALJ) for the National Labor Relations Board revoked subpoenas the company had issued for union documents in an unfair labor practice dispute. Id. at 1495-96 . … Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 78 F.3d 219, 227 (6th Cir.1996) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1177 (6th Cir.1983)).
Cited 2 timesPublished8 F. Supp. 2d 1001 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 29, 1998
In Madison-Hughes v. … No circuit court, before Goncalves v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedJordan v. Summit County, Ohio and Summit County Board of Commissioners
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 2020
BURKE v. ) SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and SUMMIT COUNTY BOARD AND ORDER … Gallmore v. York, 2018 WL 1737120, * 8 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 4, 2018); Phelps v. Tuscarawas County, Ohio/Tuscarawas County Board of Commissioners, 2018 WL 2234917, * 8, n. 11 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown77 F. Supp. 2d 853 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 7, 1999
See Fox, 176 F.3d at 348 (citing Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)). … See Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, Will County, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).
Cited 5 timesPublishedElliott Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
434 F. Supp. 2d 483 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 10, 2006
Co. of New York v. Allied Mut. Ins. … In Total Waste Management Corp. v.
Cited 14 timesPublished148 F. Supp. 2d 894 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 2000
In Harlow v. … Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1388 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).
Cited 2 timesPublished235 F. Supp. 2d 772 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 22, 2002
“No right,” the Supreme Court observed in Reynolds v. … Doe v. Rowe, 156 F.Supp.2d 35, 48 (D.Me.2001) (denial of the right to vote is a denial of a fundamental liberty); Raetzel v.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna