Case law

Reed v. Rhodes

500 F. Supp. 404 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 23, 1980

Policies and Procedures of the State Defendants in Desegregation Matters in the years following Brown v. Board of Education. The decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. … This Court cannot conclude that the State of Ohio operated a state-wide racially dual system of public schooling at the time of Brown v. Board of Education, supra.

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 17, 2020

Garner v. Heckler, 745 F.2d 383, 387- 88 (6th Cir. 1984) (citing Myers v. Richardson, 471 F.2d 1265 (6th Cir. 1972)). … See, e.g., Moon v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1175, 1181 (6th Cir. 1990); Abbott v. Sullivan, 905 F.2d 918, 923 (6th Cir. 1990); Kafantaris v. Berryhill, No. 1:17CV568, 2018 WL 1157762, at *23 (N.D.

New York Central Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

140 F. Supp. 273 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 1, 1956

Joint Horning, Brown, *275 Gilbert and Kennedy. By direction of National Mediation Board.” … This Board is therefore unable to docket application of organizations and is closing its file C-2386. By order of the National Mediation Board. Joint Horning, Brown, Gilbert, Kennedy, MacSwan.”

In re Silver

208 F. 797 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 2, 1912

Brown v. National Bank, 44 Ohio St. 269 , 274, 6 N. E. 648 . In Shirras v. Caig, 7 Cranch, 34, 51 ( 3 L. … Pomeroy, § 1235; Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 , 17 Sup. Ct. 453, 41 L.

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 27, 2019

Ellars v. Comm’r of Soc. … .”); Hall v.

Craggett v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School District

2 Ohio Misc. 7 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 2, 1964

Ed. 2d 216 (1964), but rather is a case within the purview of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483 , 74 S. Ct. 686 , 98 L. Ed. 873 (1954). … The meaning of the Brown decision was explained in a subsequent decision when the Court said that Brown “decided that enforced racial segregation in the public schools of a State is a denial of the equal protection of the

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 17, 2019

. §§ 416.912, 416.913(d)); Kafantaris v. 3 Brown was represented by counsel, thus Lashley v. Sec’y of HHS, cited by claimant, is inapposite. See R. 12, PageID #: 805, citing Lashley v. … . § 416.912); D’Amato v. Astrue, 538 F. Supp. 2d 730, 736 (D. Del. 2008); Schwartz v. Halter, 134 F. Supp. 2d 640, 656 (E.D. Pa. 2001) (citing Hess v.

Stout v. Byrider

50 F. Supp. 2d 733 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 9, 1999

Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. … See Ferro Corp. v.

Brown

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 18, 2026

Franchise Tax Bd. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Tr., 463 U.S. 1, 27–28 (1983). … Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp., 501 F.3d 555, 560 (6th Cir. 2007).

Commonwealth S. S. Co. v. American Shipbuilding Co.

197 F. 797 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 24, 1912

Yeiser v. United States Board & Paper Co. (C. C. A. 6) 107 Fed. 340 , 46 C. C. A. 567 , 52 L. R. A. 724; Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee Land Co. (C. C. ) 116 Fed. 743 ; Erlanger v. … The court then refers to Yeiser v. United States Board & Paper Co., 107 Fed. 340 , 46 C. C. A. 567 , 52 L. R.

Rettig v. Kent City School District

539 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 1981

See Battle v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269 (3d Cir. 1980); Rowley v. Board of Education, 483 F.Supp. 528 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff’d, 632 F.2d 945 (2d Cir. 1980); Pinkerton v. … Louis Brown, Dr. Ann Donnellan and Ms.

In re Nat'l Prescription Opiate Litig.

325 F. Supp. 3d 833 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 26, 2018

In re Knoxville News-Sentinel Co., Inc. , 723 F.2d 470 , 474-75 (1983) ; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC , 710 F.2d 1165 , 1178 (1983). The Sixth Circuit acknowledged, however, that this right is not absolute. … Brown & Williamson , 710 F.2d at 1179 , Knoxville News-Sentinel , 723 F.2d at 474 .

Fellabaum v. Swift & Co.

54 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 11, 1944

See Jax Beer Co. v. Redfern, 5 Cir., 124 F.2d 172 ; Rauhoff v. Henry Gramling & Co., D.C., 42 F.Supp. 754 ; Walling v. Goldblatt Bros., op. cit.; Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co., op. cit.; Jewel Tea Co. v. … See Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co., op. cit.; Higgins v. Carr Bros., 317 U.S. 572 , 63 S.Ct. 337 , 87 L.Ed. 468 ; Walling v. Goldblatt Bros., op. cit.; Allesandro v. C. F. Smith Co., 6 Cir., 136 F.2d 75 ; Walling v.

Rainey v. Perkins Township Board of Trustees

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2023

ORDER Perkins Township Board of Trustees, et al., Defendants. … Equity Trust Co. v. Martin, No. 1:22- cv-1004, 2022 WL 4281372, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 19, 2022) (citing Yang Zhang v.

Adams v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.

28 F.2d 225 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 10, 1928

One principle is well expressed in Brown Hoisting & Conveying Mach. Co. v. King Bridge Co. (6 C. C. … Schrader Son v. Dill Mfg. Co. (6 C. C. A.) 262 F. 504 ; Vandenburgh v. Truscon Steel Co. (6 C. C. A.) 277 F. 345 ; Hug v. Lakewood Engineering Co. (D. C.) 291 F. 892 ; Elite Mfg. Co. v. Ashland Mfg. Co. (6 C. C.

McClean v. Bradley

282 F. 1011 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 1, 1922

And so the fact that a controlling number of the board were here the purchasers does not necessarily destroy the validity of this sale. See, also, McKittrick v. Arkansas Central R. Co., 152 U. S. 473 , 14 Sup. … Lathrop v. Bampton, 31 Cal. 17 , 89 Am. Dec. 141 ; Orcutt v. Gould, 117 Cal. 315 , 49 Pac. 188 ; McGrath v. Carroll, 110 Cal. 79 , 42 Pac. 466 .

Walker v. City of Lakewood

742 F. Supp. 429 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 2, 1990

Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 , 109 S.Ct. 573 , 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989) (Appropriate state statute of limitations in § 1983 actions is residual or general personal injury statute); Browning v. … Second, even if the Court could borrow, for § 1986 actions, Ohio’s tolling rules for state statute of limitations—Board of Regents v.

Board of Trustees for Regina Public School Dist. No. 4 of Saskatchewan v. Spitzer

255 F. 136 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 9, 1919

In Harris v. … A. 1915A, 990; Weil et al. v. Newbern, 126 Tenn. 223 , 148 S. W. 680 , Ann. Cas. 1913E, 25, and notes thereto in L. R. A. 1915A, 1023; Frank v. Board of Education of Jersey City, 90 N. J. Law, 273, 100 Atl. 211 , L. R.

Cuyahoga County Ass'n for Retarded Children & Adults v. Essex

411 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 5, 1976

While the Supreme Court has spoken of education as “perhaps the most important function of state and local governments”, Brown v. … Goss v. Lopez, supra; Brown v. Board of Education, supra.

Mahaley v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority

355 F. Supp. 1257 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 22, 1973

Crow v. Brown, supra; Kennedy Park Homes Association v. City of Lackawanna, supra. The case of Crow v. Brown, 332 F.Supp. 382 (N.D.Ga.1971), aff’d. 457 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1972) is applicable. … This argument is also beguiling but not compelling for Bolling was the application of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) to the District of Columbia, and Hurd v.