Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

2.56s

  • Brown v. Bowen

    739 F. Supp. 1129 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 29, 1990

    Kimbrough v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 801 F.2d 794, 797 (6th Cir.1986). … Landsaw v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 803 F.2d 211 (6th Cir. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

    614 F. Supp. 289 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 19, 1985

    Accardi v. Penn R. Co., 369 F.2d 805 (2nd Cir.1966). In Schaller v. … Board of Education of Elmwood Local School, 449 F.Supp. 30 (N.D.Ohio 1978), District Judge Don Young assessed interest from the median date of the period in which the violations occurred.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hoe v. Brown

    446 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 1976

    . §§ 2281 and 2284, issued its Order granting plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction pending the United States Supreme Court’s disposition of Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. … Danforth, 392 F.Supp. 1362 (E.D.Mo. 1975), and Baird v. Bellotti, 393 F.Supp. 847 (D.Mass.1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

    605 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 16, 1985

    For example, in Coffy v. … With respect to plaintiff Brown, the Court concludes that the MDA payments were benefits in the nature of a reward for length of service.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Georgeoff

    562 F. Supp. 1300 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 3, 1983

    Before the Court are the motions to dismiss of Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio (BFIO) and Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania (BFIP) (collectively, BFI). … Brown); id. at S 14,967 (daily ed. Nov. 24, 1980) (remarks of Sen. Stafford). This observation does not weaken Ohio and Justice’s argument.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

    422 F. Supp. 1251 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 18, 1976

    Brown proceeding pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 1a, and the remaining plaintiffs proceeding pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 744 (g). III. … I.C.C. v. Memphis Union Station Co., 360 F.2d 44 (6th Cir. 1966); New Orleans Terminal Co. v. Spencer, 366 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1966).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.

    88 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 10, 1950

    Brown, the bankrupt. Both instruments were recorded but were filed under the name of Food Center Super Market. … The case of Green v. Garrington, 16 Oh St 459, cited by petitioner is not controlling.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • J.L. Spoons, Inc. v. Brown

    40 F. Supp. 2d 902 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 12, 1999

    Although ODPS and Brown do not argue that Railroad Comm’n v. … V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Herman's Furniture, Inc.

    772 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 16, 1990

    Anderson v. … In Bowman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Maxim Healthcare Services

    171 F. Supp. 3d 696 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 22, 2016

    Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) (emphasis in original); accord Leadbetter v. Gilley, 385 F.3d 683, 689-90 (6th Cir.2004); Weaver v. … Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 Fed.Appx. 368, 372 (6th Cir.2013), citing Hicks v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Medical College of Ohio

    79 F. Supp. 2d 840 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 28, 1999

    Brown requested, and received, the six-month leave of absence in order to search for a new job while he was, technically, still employed. … On October 26, 1999, MCO instituted a formal investigation of Brown’s alleged professional improprieties. That investigation remains pending.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown Fence & Wire Co.

    9 F. Supp. 1008 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 18, 1935

    In the case of Westmoreland v. McLaughlin (D. C.) 8 F. … the court concedes that, if the stock had been issued by the new corporation to the old corporation as consideration for the transfer of assets, the case would have been controlled by Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Empire Brass Mfg. Co.

    33 F.2d 548 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 16, 1926

    Brown’s patent was litigated in this court in equity ease 1365, Brown v. Sterling Brass Co., and its validity was sustained by my associate, Hon. John M. KElits. … The question of infringement is different from what it was in Brown v. Sterling. Brass Co. The device there held to infringe was a Chinese copy.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wohl v. Cleveland Board of Education

    741 F. Supp. 688 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 15, 1990

    After receiving his right to sue letter, dated March 31, 1988, Wohl instituted a pro se Complaint on June 29, 1988 against Defendant Cleveland Board of Education (“The Board”) in Case No. 88-2151. … Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 , 109 S.Ct. 573, 582 , 102 L.Ed.2d 594, 605-06 (1989) (Courts should borrow the general or residual state statute of limitations); Browning v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bickerstaff v. Cuyahoga County

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 21, 2020

    Comm'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403–04, 117 S.Ct. 1382, 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citation omitted). … Co. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362, 369, 60 S.Ct. 968, 84 L.Ed. 1254 (1940))). Lipman v. Budish, --- F.3d -----, 2020 WL 5269826 at * 16 (6th Cir. Sept. 4, 2020).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sorin v. BOARD OF ED., ETC.

    464 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 7, 1978

    Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h); Burks v. Texas Co., 211 F.2d 443 (5th Cir. 1954); Albacten v. Corbett, 156 F.Supp. 863, 864 (S.D.Cal.1957); McLaughlin v. Curtis Publishing Co., 5 F.R.D. 87 (S.D.N.Y. 1943). B. … Invasion of privacy was defined in Housh v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Tucker v. Cleveland Board of Education

    465 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 22, 1979

    Bohlander v. Independent School District No. 1, Tulsa County, 420 F.2d 693 (10th Cir. 1969); Unified Teachers v. Governing Board of Los Angeles City Unified School District, Case No. CV-76-1762-RF (C.D.Cal. … See Grenchik v. Mande!, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Youngstown Board of Education

    454 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 12, 1978

    LEGAL PRINCIPLES More than two decades ago, the Supreme Court declared in Brown v. … NAACP v. Lansing Board of Education, 559 F.2d 1042 , 1049 (6th Cir. 1977). In Keyes v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • La Fleur v. Cleveland Board of Education

    326 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 12, 1971

    In Morey v. … Speaking of this right, the Supreme Court stated in Brown, et al. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Coles v. Cleveland Board of Education

    950 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 17, 1996

    In Lee v. … In Marsh v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.