Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,048 results
1.24s
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 27, 2023
She contends I should analyze the motion for summary judgment as though the Board of Commissioners was a named defendant and, if I deny the motion, “substitute Erie County through its board of commissioners as the Defendant … Those circumstances are not present in this case, where the Erie County Board of Commissioners was never named as a defendant.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBell v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
306 F. Supp. 2d 718 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 23, 2004
In opposition to these affidavits, Conrail points out that the National Transportation Safety Board, which investigated the accident, found that none of the four crews that handled the train (including Cross and Verterano … Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 512 , 104 S.Ct. 1949 , 80 L.Ed.2d 502 (1984).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2022
Carr presents no evidence that either Brown or Richie was aware of the O’Neal complaint. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknown304 B.R. 318 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 28, 2003
See, e.g., Barbosa v. Soloman, 235 F.3d 31 (1st Cir.2000); In re Witkowski 16 F.3d 739, 746 (7th Cir.1994); In re Brown, 219 B.R. 191 (6th Cir. BAP 1998).
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States v. City of Euclid
523 F. Supp. 2d 641 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 29, 2007
See Hines v. … In Abrams v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn Re Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. Hip Prosthesis & Knee Prosthesis Products Liability Litigation
335 F. Supp. 2d 830 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 2004
Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472, 1479-80 (6th Cir.1989) (citing Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Willoughby, 863 F.2d 1029, 1034 (D.C.Cir.1988)). … Brown Flight Rental One Corp., 24 F.3d 1190, 1195 (10th Cir.1994) (quoting Bowersock v. Barker, 186 Olda. 48, 96 P.2d 18, 19 (1939)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 29, 2026
See Younger v. … Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 462 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 US. 397, 404, 1178. Ct. 1382, 137 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1997)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownEllis v. Cleveland Municipal School District
309 F. Supp. 2d 1019 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 2004
Brouillet v. Cowles Pub. Co., 114 Wash.2d 788 , 791 P.2d 526, 533 (1990); Board of Educ. of Colonial School Dist. v. Colonial Educ. Ass’n, 1996 WL 104231 , at *5-6 (Del.Ch.1996). … Jensen v. Reeves, 45 F.Supp.2d 1265, 1276 (D.Utah 1999) (citing Gundlach v. Reinstein, 924 F.Supp. 684 (E.D.Pa.1996)).
Disagreed with in part by Rhea v. District Board of Trustees, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4073 (2013)Cited 34 timesPublishedA.S. v. Black River Local School District
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 18, 2024
v. Ameritrust Co. N.A., 848 F.2d 674, 682 (6th Cir. 1988). Dismissal of a party under Rule 21 is committed to the sound discretion of the district court. Hiller v. HSBC Fin. Corp., 589 F. … App’x 320, 321 (6th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (citing Sutherland v. Michigan Dept of Treasury, 344 F.3d 6038, 612 (6th Cir. 2003)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 24, 2022
Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). The reviewing court may not “reweigh the evidence, re-evaluate the credibility of witnesses, or substitute [its] judgment for that of the [fact-finder].” Brown v. … See, Gates Mills v. Yomtovian, 8th Dist. No. 88942, 2007-Ohio-6303, ¶ 23. In my mind, this rationale renders my attack on kidnapping an attack across the board.
Cited 0 timesUnknown64 F. Supp. 3d 1033 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 31, 2014
The final appeal level is the Public Review Board (“PRB”), an independent board of labor law experts. ECF No. 22-8 at 87. … Dan Brown’s letter also mentions incidents from 2007 when production stopped because of a shortage of manpower.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCommittee to Save Cleveland's Huletts v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
163 F. Supp. 2d 776 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 2001
See Sierra Club v. … Generally, “a suit is moot only when it can be shown that a court cannot even ‘theoretically grant’ relief,” Vieux Carre Property Owners v. Brown, 948 F.2d 1436 (5th Cir.1991).
Cited 2 timesPublishedMcConocha v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mut. of Ohio
930 F. Supp. 1182 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 14, 1996
Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., 915 F.2d 201, 206 (6th Cir.1990). Consequently, such motions must be filed within ten days after the judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e); Parker v. … See Blon v.
Cited 90 timesPublished638 F. Supp. 2d 840 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 2009
Williams v. Belknap, 154 F.Supp.2d 1069, 1071 (E.D.Mich.2001) (citing 60 Ivy Street Corp. v. Alexander, 822 F.2d 1432, 1435 (6th Cir.1987)). … See Hicks v. Bryan Med.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhite v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 6, 2025
Also in February 2021, County of Summit Board of DD Service & Support Coordinator Beth Loeffler informed Mr. … White met with Scott Brown, his Support Administrator at the County Board of DD, and his mother for his annual ISP review. (Tr. 635.) Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknown450 F. Supp. 274 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 4, 1977
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati v. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 396 F.Supp. 203 (S.D.Ohio 1975). … Nizer, 505 F.2d 232 (2d Cir. 1974); Urbain v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Co., 217 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1954); Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Donovan Wire and Iron Company, supra. V.
Cited 8 timesPublished434 F. Supp. 95 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 1976
See, McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 671-76 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Damico v. California, 389 U.S. 416, 417 , 88 S.Ct. 526 , 19 L.Ed.2d 647 (1967); King v. … See, Examining Board v. Flores DeOtero, 426 U.S. 572 , 96 S.Ct. 2264, 2281 , 49 L.Ed.2d 65 (1976); In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717, 721-22 , 93 S.Ct. 2851 , 37 L.Ed.2d 910 (1973); Washington v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 28, 2026
I reject Paragraphs 11, 17, and 19 because they contain provisions I conclude to be at odds with the Local Rules of the Northern District of Ohio, my Standing Order regarding discovery disputes, and Shane Group, Inc. v. … Shane Grp., Inc., 825 F.3d at 305 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown162 F. Supp. 2d 755 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 2001
On April 20, 2001, the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the immigration judge’s decision per curiam. On July 11, 2001, the Board denied Roman’s timely motion to reopen. … For example, in Mojica v.
Cited 14 timesPublished398 B.R. 583 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 16, 2008
Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm, 501 F.3d 775, 779 (6th Cir.2007) (citing Grutter v. Bollinger, 188 F.3d 394, 397-98 (6th Cir.1999)). … See Stein v. Brown, 18 Ohio St.3d 305, 308 , 480 N.E.2d 1121 (1985).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna