Case law

League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Blackwell

432 F. Supp. 2d 734 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 10, 2006

Ernst v. Rising, 427 F.3d 351, 358 (6th Cir.2005) (citing Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 21 , 10 S.Ct. 504 , 33 L.Ed. 842 (1890)). … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir.1989). However, if a violation is continuing, the statute of limitations poses no bar. Bell v. Ohio State Univ., 351 F.3d 240, 247 (6th Cir.2003).

McConocha v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mut. of Ohio

930 F. Supp. 1182 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 14, 1996

Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., 915 F.2d 201, 206 (6th Cir.1990). Consequently, such motions must be filed within ten days after the judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e); Parker v. … See Blon v.

Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.

29 F. Supp. 2d 801 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 23, 1998

Cenco Inc. v. … See also Nagel v.

McNea v. Garey

434 F. Supp. 95 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 1976

See, McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 671-76 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Damico v. California, 389 U.S. 416, 417 , 88 S.Ct. 526 , 19 L.Ed.2d 647 (1967); King v. … See, Examining Board v. Flores DeOtero, 426 U.S. 572 , 96 S.Ct. 2264, 2281 , 49 L.Ed.2d 65 (1976); In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717, 721-22 , 93 S.Ct. 2851 , 37 L.Ed.2d 910 (1973); Washington v.

Wong Sun v. Fluckey

283 F. 989 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 6, 1922

Cas. 82 , No. 7,597a; Carter v. McClaughry (C. C.) 105 Fed. 614 ; In re Kopel (D. C.) 148 Fed. 505 ; Chin Fong v. White, 258 Fed. 849 , 169 C. C. A. 569 . … See Bailey on Habeas Corpus, § 59; Brown on Jurisdiction of Courts, § 111; Mercein v. People, 25 Wend. 65, 94, 100 , 35 Am. Dec. 653 , 49 L. R. A. 831; Weir v. Marley, 99 Mo. 484 , 12 S. W. 798 ; Miskimmins v.

Committee to Save Cleveland's Huletts v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

163 F. Supp. 2d 776 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 2001

See Sierra Club v. … Generally, “a suit is moot only when it can be shown that a court cannot even ‘theoretically grant’ relief,” Vieux Carre Property Owners v. Brown, 948 F.2d 1436 (5th Cir.1991).

Condappa

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 8, 2026

Specifically, the Board of Immigration Appeals mandatory detention rule established in Matter of A-W-, 25 I. & N. … .”); Nreka v.

Braun v. Northern Ohio Bank

430 F. Supp. 367 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 17, 1977

In Ernst & Ernst v. … Citing Simmons v.

Franke v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 24, 2021

The Board (as we shall refer to any adjustment board under the RLA) has exclusive jurisdiction over minor disputes.”). Such adjustment boards include Public Law Boards like the one at issue here. … “Fraud in this context is understood to mean fraud by a member of the Board, not fraud by a party.” Green v. Grand Trunk W. R. Inc., 155 F. App’x 173, 176 (6th Cir. 2005); see also Fine v.

Roman v. Ashcroft

162 F. Supp. 2d 755 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 2001

On April 20, 2001, the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the immigration judge’s decision per curiam. On July 11, 2001, the Board denied Roman’s timely motion to reopen. … For example, in Mojica v.

Bishop v. Pecsok

431 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 18, 1976

See, e. g., Jones v. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 , 88 S.Ct. 2186 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1189 (1968); Hollins v. Kraas, 369 F.Supp. 1355 (D.C.Ill.1973). Race cannot be the sole reason for rejecting a prospective tenant; see, Bush v. … The defendant claims that he rejected the plaintiffs’ application for housing on the basis of objective standards employed across-the-board to all applicants without regard to race. This defense is without merit.

Williams v. Green

270 F. Supp. 977 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 13, 1967

In many respects the situation of petitioner here resembles that presented in Meadows v. … In that case, after petitioner was convicted, sentenced, and delivered to the penitentiary, the Parole Board revoked his parole by an order reciting the conviction as the only ground for revocation.

Diamabrush LLC v. Malish Corporation

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 15, 2022

BRENNAN ) v. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER … Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)).

Andrade v. Crawford & Co.

792 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 5, 1992

This holding was based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Martin v. … Following the “manifest injustice” exception enunciated in Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974), as limited by United States v.

Clay v. Weidner

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 16, 2020

See Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 990-91 (6th Cir. 1989). “[F]ederal law governs the question of when that limitations period begins to run.” Sevier v. … Although “a court cannot ‘create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleadings,” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

Damron v. Harris

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 28, 2020

See also Andrews v. … (quoting Malik v. McGinnis, 293 F.3d 559, 562-63 (2d Cir. 2002); see also Ashley v.

Triomphe Investors v. City of Northwood

835 F. Supp. 1036 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 29, 1993

Owen v. … See Celotex v.

Perry v. PERRY FARMS, INC.

638 F. Supp. 2d 840 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 2009

Williams v. Belknap, 154 F.Supp.2d 1069, 1071 (E.D.Mich.2001) (citing 60 Ivy Street Corp. v. Alexander, 822 F.2d 1432, 1435 (6th Cir.1987)). … See Hicks v. Bryan Med.

Viars v. General Motors Corp.

649 F. Supp. 814 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 29, 1986

In Blankenship v. … See, e.g., Ball v. Victor K. Browning & Co., 21 Ohio App.3d 175 , 21 O.B.R. 186 , 487 N.E.2d 326 (Ashtabula Cty. App.1984); Viock v.

Pattie v. Coach, Inc.

29 F. Supp. 3d 1051 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 2, 2014

And in Stem v. … Cleveland Browns Football Club, Inc., the advertisement was an offer directed specifically to the plaintiff by name for the renewal of his season tickets and which also included a specific price term for the seats. 95-L-196