Case law

Steed

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 24, 2026

Bassett v. … Boulder v.

Jones v. City of Youngstown

980 F. Supp. 908 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 14, 1997

Powell (“Powell”), Officer Robert Patton (“Patton”), Robert Clark (“Clark”), Paul Brown (“Brown”) of the Special Investigation Unit (“SIU”), and 24 unidentified Youngstown police officers in their individual capacity. … In Albright v.

Peppers v. Barry

718 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 2, 1989

DISCUSSION In Weisenberger v. … The court in Northcross v.

Food & Service Trades Council v. Retail Associates, Inc.

115 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 21, 1953

National Labor Relations Board, 1944, 321 U.S. 332, 334 , 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 ; Yazoo & M. V. R. Co. v. Webb, 5 Cir., 1933, 64 F.2d 902 ; Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Moore, 5 Cir., 1940, 112 F.2d 959 . … Case Co. v.

Meurer Steel Barrel Co. v. Draper Mfg. Co.

260 F. 410 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 14, 1919

Justice Brown in Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co., 177 U. S. 485 ,- 488, 20 Sup. Ct. 708, 44 L. Ed. 856 . … See, also, Macbeth v. Gillinder (C. C.) 54 Fed. 169 ; Beach v. Hobbs (C. C.) 82 Fed. 916 ; Penfield v. Potts (C. C. A. 6) 126 Fed. 475 , 61 C. C. A. 371 ; Doelger v. German-American Filter Co., 204 Fed. 274 , 122 C. C.

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Guarantee Trust Life Insurance

8 F. Supp. 2d 1008 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 16, 1998

See Varsic v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 607 F.2d 245, 248 (9th Cir.1979); Bostic v. Ohio River Co. … See, Hanley v. Omarc, Inc., 6 F.Supp.2d 770 (N.D.Ill.1998); Tranor v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 388, 391 (E.D.Pa.1996); Verosol B.V. v.

In re Devonian Mineral Spring Co.

272 F. 527 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 24, 1920

St. § 9616) and General Order 6 (89 Fed. v, 32 C. C. A. ix ). … Nelson Supply Co. v. Leary, 39 Am. Bankr. Rep. 755, 49 Utah, 493 , 164 Pac. 1047 ; Griffin v. Lenhart, 45 Am. Bankr. Rep. 221, 266 Fed. 671 (4 C. C. A.).

Kalemba v. Turk

353 F. Supp. 1101 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 18, 1973

P. v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 432, 433 , 83 S.Ct. 328 , 9 L.Ed.2d 405 (1963). … While defendants cite Beauharnais v.

West Side Women's Services, Inc. v. City of Cleveland

450 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 1978

See, e. g., Planned Parenthood of Minnesota, Inc. v. … Board of Selectmen of Southborough, 367 N.E.2d 606 (Mass.Sup.Jud.Ct.1977)(abortion clinics declared prohibited use for entire town); Kennan v.

Taylor v. Canton, Ohio Police Dept.

544 F. Supp. 783 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 11, 1982

See Stengel v. Belcher, 522 F.2d 438 (6th Cir. 1975), and Layne v. … While Monell v.

City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric, Illuminating Co.

538 F. Supp. 1320 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 31, 1980

In Hanover Shoe v. … This was clearly stated by the AMP-Ohio board in their resolution authorizing the PASNY application. The board resolved: II.

United States v. Skeddle

989 F. Supp. 917 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 2, 1997

Coup. v. Republic of the Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414 , 1424 (3d Cir.1991)). … See Chinnici v. Central DuPage Hosp.

Trane U.S. Inc. v. Meehan

250 F.R.D. 319 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 29, 2008

Compare Liberty Folder v. … Computrex, Inc. v. Brown, 2005 WL 1866081 , *3 (E.D.Ky.2005); see also Baker v.

United States v. LTV Steel Co., Inc.

118 F. Supp. 2d 827 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 20, 2000

LTV did appeal this violation to the City’s Board of Building Standards and Appeals. … In United States v.

McGlumphy v. Fraternal Order of Police

633 F. Supp. 1074 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 16, 1986

See Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 224 , 97 S.Ct. 1782, 1793-94 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1976). … V.

Maynard v. Kear

474 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 19, 1979

Therefore, plaintiffs have failed to state a claim against King, Taylor, and Brown, and summary judgment is appropriate. … See Brown v. Fogel, 387 F.2d 692 (4th Cir. 1967). The limits on the means of recapture are also well recognized, but have not been so explicitly stated as the right of recapture itself. Taylor v.

Steiner v. Henderson

194 F. Supp. 2d 688 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 28, 2002

Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … See, e.g., Ang v.

Rokicki v. United States

164 F. Supp. 610 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 1958

We concur in the conclusion of the Court arrived at in the case of La Jolla Casa de Manana v. Riddell, D.C., 106 F. Supp. 132 , decided June 27, 1952, and affirmed in 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 925 . … . *614 We agree also with the decision in the case of Godwin v. Brown, 8 Cir., 1957, 249 F.2d 356 , which appears to be in point. We agree also with the reasoning in the case of Hover v.

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Republic Technologies International, LLC

287 F. Supp. 2d 815 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 2003

PBGC’s Operations The Secretaries of the Treasury, Commerce, and Labor comprise PBGC’s board of directors (the “Board”). … United Steel Workers of Am. v.

Nottingham-Spirk Design Associates, Inc. v. Halo Innovations, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 19, 2022

Malone v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., 965 F.3d 499, 501 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … v.