Case law

Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. City of Akron

628 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 7, 1986

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … In light of Brown , the cases relied upon by plaintiffs are distinguishable.

Aluminum Goods Mfg. Co. v. Buckeye Aluminum Co.

291 F. 806 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 26, 1923

Boldt Co. v. … Justice Brown in Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully, 144 U. S. 224, 234 , 12 Sup. Ct. 632, 636 ( 36 L.

Marec v. United States Steel Corp.

195 F. Supp. 137 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 16, 1961

Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, 321 U.S. 342 , 64 S.Ct. 582 , 88 L.Ed. 788 ; People v. Vickroy, 266 Ill. 384 , 107 N.E. 638 ; Rolax v. Atlantic Coast Line R. … Co., 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 ; State v. Pate, 47 N.M. 182 , 138 P. 2d 1006 ; State Board of Assessors v. New Jersey Cent. R. Co., 48 N.J.L. 146 , 4 A. 578 ; Attorney General v.

Leiblinger v. Saks Fifth Avenue

612 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 25, 1985

McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 189 , 56 S.Ct. 780, 785 , 80 L.Ed. 1135 (1936); Thomson v. Gaskill, 315 U.S. 442, 446 , 62 S.Ct. 673, 675 , 86 L.Ed. 951 (1942); Nassau Sports v. … Parker v. Brown, 570 F.Supp. 640, 642 (S.D.Ohio 1983).

Schaffrath v. Akron/Summit/Medina Private Industrial Council

674 F. Supp. 1308 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 14, 1987

Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Smith v. Hudson, 600 F.2d 60 (6th Cir.1979); cert. dismissed, 444 U.S. 986 , 100 S.Ct. 495 , 62 L.Ed.2d 415 (1979); Board of Ed. … Vogel v. Torrance Board of Education, 447 F.Supp. 258 (C.D.Cal.1978). The purpose of naming the defendant in the EEOC charge is twofold.

E.E.O.C. v. Spitzer Management, Inc.

866 F. Supp. 2d 851 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 2012

Logan v. Denny’s, 259 F.3d 558, 569 (6th Cir.2001) (quoting and adopting Brown v. Bunge Corp., 207 F.3d 776, 782 (5th Cir. 2000)). … Hamdan also *863 testified that the graffiti remained on the sales board from March of 2007 through the time he quit in September.

Ripepi v. USA Taekwondo, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 29, 2021

See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). … Gallagher v. Cleveland Browns, 74 Ohio St.3d 427, 431, 659 N.E.2d 1232 (1996).

Flowers v. TRW Inc.

680 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 17, 1987

Balmes v. Board of Educ. of Cleveland, 436 F.Supp. 129 (N.D.Ohio 1977). … Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Bd. of Educ., 585 F.2d 192, 195 (6th Cir.1978). Furthermore, as an action for equitable relief, title VII cases are tried to the Court rather than by jury. Dadas v.

McKenzie v. United States, Internal Revenue Service

225 B.R. 377 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 1, 1998

In re Hahn v. United States, 1996 WL 303296 , *3 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1996). … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 136-37 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979).

Warpar Manufacturing Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc.

606 F. Supp. 852 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 21, 1984

The Warpar v. … In General Electric Co., the trial court found such a presumption to apply but Judge Brown referred to the opinion of Judge Robert Krupansky, then a district court judge in the case of City of Cleveland v.

Whitney v. American Shipbuilding Co.

197 F. 777 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 7, 1911

In the case of Youngstown Bank v. Hughes, 106 U. S. 523 , 1 Sup. Ct. 489, 27 L. … See, also, Pratt v. Fitzhugh, 1 Black, 271 , 17 L. Ed. 206 , De Krafft v. Barney, 2 Black, 704 , 17 L. Ed. 350 , and Potts v. Chumasero, 92 U. S. 358, 361 , 23 L. Ed. 499 .

American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. City of Stow

29 F. Supp. 2d 845 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 16, 1998

See Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 , 117 S.Ct. 1997, 2008 , 138 L.Ed.2d 391 (1997); Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. … Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753, 792 , 115 S.Ct. 2440 , 132 L.Ed.2d 650 (1995). The “effect” of the seal must be measured under the “reasonable observer” standard. Allegheny County v.

Ohio Public Interest Campaign v. Fisher Foods, Inc.

546 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 27, 1982

See also In re Montgomery County Real Estate Antitrust Litigation, 83 F.R.D. 305 (D.Md.1979); Arenson v. Board of Trade of Chicago, 372 F.Supp. 1349 (N.D.Ill.1974); Colson v. … See, Butkowsky v. Prince Georges County Board of Realtors, 4 Class Action Reports 242 (D. Md. 1972); James v. Phoenix Real Estate Board, Inc., 714 BNA Antitrust & Trade Reg. Rep. A-6 (D. Ariz. 1976).

Cellura v. United States

245 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 24, 1965

United States v. Graham, 309 F.2d 210, 212 (CA 9, 1962); Bloom v. United States, 272 F.2d 215, 222 (CA 9, 1960); Griswold v. United States, 209 F.Supp. 98, 100 (D.C.S.D.Cal.1962); Wiggins v. … Browne v. United States, 234 F.Supp. 19 (D.C.Minn., 1964). Therefore, if plaintiff had been liable under the statute her liability could be no greater than for the taxes due for the months of January and February, 1960.

Winkelman v. Ohio Department of Education

616 F. Supp. 2d 714 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2008

In Murphy v. … Similarly, the court in Wittenberg v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education, No. 1:05 CV 818, 2006 WL 2568937 , at *5, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63812 , at *17 (M.D.N.C.

Blasingim

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 13, 2025

Shane Grp., 825 F.3d at 306 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1176 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Id. at 306 (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1176).

Jones v. City of Youngstown

980 F. Supp. 908 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 14, 1997

Powell (“Powell”), Officer Robert Patton (“Patton”), Robert Clark (“Clark”), Paul Brown (“Brown”) of the Special Investigation Unit (“SIU”), and 24 unidentified Youngstown police officers in their individual capacity. … In Albright v.

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Guarantee Trust Life Insurance

8 F. Supp. 2d 1008 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 16, 1998

See Varsic v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 607 F.2d 245, 248 (9th Cir.1979); Bostic v. Ohio River Co. … See, Hanley v. Omarc, Inc., 6 F.Supp.2d 770 (N.D.Ill.1998); Tranor v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 388, 391 (E.D.Pa.1996); Verosol B.V. v.

Buckeye S. S. Co. v. Union Towing & Wrecking Co.

68 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 6, 1946

Genesee Chief v. … Co. v. Pittsburgh S. S.

Peppers v. Barry

718 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 2, 1989

DISCUSSION In Weisenberger v. … The court in Northcross v.