Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,048 results
1.38s
McKnight v. NM Paterson & Sons, Limited
181 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 23, 1960
ship where the injuries are caused by a breaking block brought on board by the stevedoring company.” 205 F.2d at page 478. … In Rogers v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 27, 2021
Judicial Board. … Brown Univ., 166 F. Supp. 3d 177, 196 (D. R.I. 2016) (dismissing negligence claim, because it was based on the same duty as contract claim).
Cited 0 timesUnknown337 F. Supp. 1405 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 5, 1971
Bible v. Board of Elections, 22 O.S.2d 57 , 258 N.E.2d 227 (1970). Protection of party membership uniformly applied to all parties cannot be characterized as “invidious discrimination” as defined in Williams . … Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 , 72 S.Ct. 654 , 96 L.Ed. 894 (1952).
Cited 23 timesPublished15 F.R.D. 465 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 20, 1954
In Gudger v. … Similar rulings were made in Brown v. Bedell, 234 App.Div. 90 , 254 N.Y.S. 215 , and Parodis v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc., 178 Misc. 191 , 33 N.Y.S.2d 553 .
Cited 12 timesPublished381 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 22, 1974
Levey v. Smith, supra, 103 F.2d at 648 (emphasis supplied). See also, Hight v. United States, 256 F.2d 795 (2nd Cir. 1958); St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Burnet, 59 F.2d 922, 927 (8th Cir. 1932); Markle et al. v. … Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedEmbassy Realty Investments, Inc. v. City of Cleveland
976 F. Supp. 2d 931 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 4, 2013
The notice was served upon the church, with the administrative right to appeal the notice to the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) and/or the Cleveland Board of Building Standards and Building Appeals (“local BBS/BA”). … The notice, which was issued to Barnes, informed Barnes of his administrative right to appeal to the City’s appeals boards. Barnes never appealed this violation notice to either administrative appeals board. B.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHorizon Coal Corp. v. United States
876 F. Supp. 1512 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 1993
Power v. … Edge-wood Contracting Co., 416 F.2d 1081 (5th Cir.1969) (findings of the National Labor Relations Board given res judicata effect on- the issue of liability); Bernos Coal Co. v.
Reversed on other grounds by Horizon Coal Corporation v. United States of America, Jerry Kohl D/B/A Kohl Industries, Third-Party, 43 F.3d 234 (1994)Cited 1 timesPublishedEvans v. Nicholson Transit Co.
58 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 20, 1944
In SoconyVacuum Oil Co. v. … See Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co., 3 Cir., 122 F.2d 98 . The motion of the respondent to dismiss the libel is accordingly denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished191 F.R.D. 125 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 30, 1999
Bacik v. Peek, 888 F.Supp. 1405, 1412 (N.D.Ohio 1993). … Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished8 F.2d 59 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 27, 1923
On April 28,1920, the United States Shipping Board entered into a charter sales agreement with Charles C. A. Pfltsch, trading as the International Bureau of Supplies. … Osaka Shosen Kaisha v. Pacific Export Lumber Co., 260 U. S. 490 , 43 S. Ct. 172 , 1923 A. M. C. 55; Piedmont Coal Co. v. Seaboard,Fisheries Co., 254 U. S. 1 , 41 S. Ct. 1 , 67 L.
Cited 4 timesPublishedP.R. v. Woodmore Local School District
481 F. Supp. 2d 860 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 8, 2007
Board of Educ. of Murphysboro Community Unit School Dist. No. 186 v. … (citing Hudson v.
Cited 1 timesPublished564 F. Supp. 2d 759 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 9, 2008
Kottmyer v. Maas, 436 F.3d 684, 689 (6th Cir.2006) (quoting Ziegler v. IBP Hog Mkt., Inc., 249 F.3d 509, 512 (6th Cir.2001)). III. Discussion A. … See, e.g., Mowatt v. Brown, 902 F.2d 34 (6th Cir.1990); Tate v. Brown, 902 F.2d 35 (6th Cir.1990); Howard v. Heffron, 884 F.2d 1392 (6th Cir. 1989).
Cited 2 timesPublishedHodory v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services
408 F. Supp. 1016 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 5, 1976
Board of Registration Commissioners, 466 F.2d 879, 884 (6th Cir. 1972). … Barnes v. Board of Review, Case No. 3948 (1972).
Cited 5 timesPublishedLocal 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.
890 F. Supp. 2d 827 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 20, 2012
On May 17, 2010, Local 377 filed with the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) an unfair labor practice charge against Shelly & Sands alleging that Shelly & Sands “made threats to and otherwise discriminated against … Local 377 withdrew the unfair labor practice charge *831 with the Board’s approval on June 25, 2010. (Id., ¶ 11 and Ex. 7.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedPACEMAKER PLASTICS CO., INC. v. AFM Corp.
163 F. Supp. 2d 795 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 14, 2001
Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir.1996); Board of Trustees of Painesville Tp. v. City of Painesville, 200 F.3d 396, 398 (6th Cir.1999). … Arent v.
Cited 1 timesPublished384 F. Supp. 1196 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 9, 1974
The Court has carefully studied the opinion of Judge Johnson in Wyatt v. … There shall be at least three (3) evaluation teams composed of at least three (3) persons, of whom one must be a Board Certified psychiatrist, or at least Board Eligible.
Cited 37 timesPublished578 F. Supp. 361 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 27, 1984
The court in United States v. … The court in United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCorrell v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
266 F. Supp. 2d 711 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 2, 2003
See, e.g., Duty v. … See, e.g., Ellis v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKendel v. Local 17-A United Food & Commercial Workers
835 F. Supp. 2d 421 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 5, 2011
.”); EEOC v. … Key v. DSW, Inc., 454 F.Supp.2d 684, 689 (S.D.Ohio 2006); see also Giordano v. Wachovia Sec., 2006 WL 2177036 , 2006 U.S. Dist. Lexis 52266 (D.N.J.2006); Forbes v. Wells Fargo, 420 F.Supp.2d 1018 (D.Minn.2006); Guin v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrush Wellman, Inc. v. Department of Labor
500 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 8, 1980
National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 136 , 95 *522 S.Ct. 1504, 1509, 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975), quoting from S.Rep.No. 813, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess., 3 (1965). … Environmental Protection Agency v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 87 , 93 S.Ct. 827, 836 , 35 L.Ed.2d 119 (1973); National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., supra, 421 U.S. at 151 , 95 S.Ct. at 1516 .
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna