Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

0.56s

  • Detty v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation, Unpublished Decision (7-6-2000)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2000

    Chapter 4117 is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the State Employment Relations Board. Gunn v. Euclid City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1988), 51 Ohio App.3d 41 , 43 . … BOWMAN, P.J., and BROWN, J., concur.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Builder's Kitchens of Stark County, Inc. v. Sibel

    189 Ohio App. 3d 41 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2010

    George v. Fannin (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 703, 709 , 588 N.E.2d 195 , citing Konicki v. … Varavvas v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Laituri v. Nero

    138 Ohio App. 3d 348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2000

    Appellant alleged that the three defendants comprised the City Treasury Investment Board (“board”). … In Laituri v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Bush v. Spurlock

    3 Ohio App. Unrep. 19 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 9, 1990

    Monahan v. Richley, supra. As the employer, the Board has the burden of proving that the employee either found or could have found other employment. State, ex rel. Martin, v. Bexley City School Dist. … Crockett, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Huntington Natl. Bank Mtge. Loan Dept. v. Peppel

    2014 Ohio 3084 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 2014

    Wells Fargo Bank v. Smith, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2012-04-006, 2013-Ohio-855, ¶ 17, citing Third Fed. S. & L. Assn. of Cleveland v. Farno, 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2012- 04-028, 2012-Ohio-5245, ¶ 10. … Fuson v. Fisher, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA97-05-013, 1998 WL 65690, *3 (Feb. 17, 1998), quoting Green v. B.F. Goodrich Co., 85 Ohio App.3d 223, 228 (9th Dist.1993).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barack v. Belmont Savs. Bank

    2023 Ohio 1679 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 16, 2023

    Corp. v. … See Fortner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Jones

    187 Ohio App. 3d 478 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2010

    Id. at ¶ 24. {¶ 38} However, unlike in Brown, there is no evidence that Sergeant Gazarek’s questioning in this case “expanded] the investigative scope of the detention.” Id. at ¶ 20. … In Brown, the court was “convinced that by impermissibly questioning both the driver and appellant, the length of the stop was prolonged.” Brown at ¶ 23.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Wyde

    90 Ohio App. 3d 471 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1993

    Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding. … State v. Singer (1977), 50 *475 Ohio St.2d 103, 4 O.O.3d 237 , 362 N.E.2d 1216 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Gray

    20 Ohio App. 3d 318 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1984

    See State v. DeFranco (Oct. 6, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 46504, unreported; State v. Morris (1982), 8 Ohio App. 3d 12,15-16 ; State v. Brown (March 11, 1982), Cuyahoga App. No. 43747, unreported.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Marietta Coal Co.

    35 Ohio App. 2d 230 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 22, 1973

    The action in the court of common pleas was an appeal from an order of the reclamation board of review. The court of common pleas affirmed that order. … See Zeisloft v. Board (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 180 . In that case the notice of appeal was filed 28 days after the entry of judgment, but while a motion for new trial was pending.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nacelle Land Management Corp. v. Ohio Department of Natural Resources

    65 Ohio App. 3d 481 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1989

    Sand & Gravel Co. v. … Edmisten, v. Jackson (July 1, 1976), Franklin App. No. 75AP-557, unreported, and State, ex rel. Nicholson, v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McGinn v. Columbus Railway & Light Co.

    4 Ohio App. 398 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1913

    In the case of Drown v. … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Marca Edn. v. Serb, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2004)

    2004 Ohio 2647 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 2004

    Brown and Watson, JJ., concur. APPENDIX A IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. … Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 95 Ohio St.3d 533 , 2002-Ohio-2839 ; Lorain City Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Whitehall v. Olander

    2014 Ohio 4066 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2014

    Hosp. v. … Huffer v. Brown, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-1086, 2013-Ohio-4384, ¶ 10. {¶ 47} For the foregoing reasons, we overrule the third assignment of error. IV.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Davie, 2007-T-0069 (12-21-2007)

    2007 Ohio 6940 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2007

    State v. Brown , 166 Ohio App.3d 252 , 2006-Ohio-1796 , at ¶ 8 , citing State v. Green (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 352 , 359 . … Brown at ¶ 8 . {¶ 23} The issue of whether the trial court afforded Mr. Davie the right to allocution should have been raised in Mr. Davie's direct appeal.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Austin

    131 Ohio App. 3d 329 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 1998

    Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge. … State v. Brown. 1 To be deemed nonprejudicial, error of constitutional dimension must be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Harlan

    105 Ohio App. 3d 756 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1995

    In State v. … In State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Du v. Nottingham Gate Estates HOA, Inc.

    2024 Ohio 6090 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2024

    See Emrick v. … Cerio v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Jones

    2013 Ohio 4638 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 2013

    Liming at ¶ 11; Brown v. Executive 200, Inc., 64 Ohio St.2d 250, 253 (1980). {¶26} The distinction between civil and criminal contempt is typically based on the sanction’s purpose. State ex rel. Corn v. … Brown, 64 Ohio St.2d at 253. Therefore, the trial court was proceeding on a civil contempt for which clear and convincing evidence was required. Brown, 64 Ohio St.2d at 250.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kayser v. Estabrook & Co.

    45 Ohio App. 2d 38 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1974

    Nixon, and Wilfred Brown of the New York office of the defendants; the deposition of Edward and Laura Kayser, taken on cross-examination; and the deposition of John V. … Brown, P. J., Potter and Wiley, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.