Case law

Sorgen v. State

36 Ohio App. 281 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1930

D. 1929, * * * one Ben Sorgen did unlawfully practice medicine * * * before he the said Ben Sorgen had obtained a certificate from the State Medical Board of Ohio to practice medicine or surgery or any of its branches in … The case of Andrews v. State, 23 C. D., 564, 15 C. C. (N.

Pignatelli v. Bath Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2016 Ohio 5691 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2016

resolution.” {¶21} In Smith v. … Genovese v. Beckham, 9th Dist. Summit No. 22814, 2006-Ohio-1174, ¶ 12. R.C. 519.14 “does not vest township boards with power to grant conditional zoning certificates independent of the zoning resolution.

State v. LaFollette

2019 Ohio 3854 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2019

State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St. 3d 380, 387, 1997-Ohio-52, 678 N.E.2d 541, quoting State v. … State v.

State v. Brazo

2021 Ohio 4006 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2021

State v. … of the board's authority to so impose a prison term.

In Re Appeal of Sheaffer

116 Ohio App. 3d 98 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1996

Kiko Agency, Inc. v. … An administrative licensing board has the authority in a disciplinary action to rely upon its own expertise in deciding whether a real estate broker has failed to conform to a minimum standard of practice. Vradenburg v.

Mooney v. Hauck

1 Ohio App. 432 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1913

The case of Morris v. Woodburn, 57 Ohio St., 330 , seems to cover the principle of the case at bar. … Chicago v. Robbins, 2 Black, 418 ; Same v. Same, *435 4 Wall., 657 ; Rochester v. Campbell, 123 N. Y., 405 .” Mr. Otis H. Fisk and Mr. Sanford Brown, for plaintiff in error. Messrs.

Cuyahoga Community College v. District 925, Service Employees International Union

42 Ohio App. 3d 166 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1988

Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Mahoning Cty. TMR Edn. Assn. (1986), 22 Ohio St. 3d 80 , 22 OBR 95, 488 N.E. 2d 872 . … The issue before the court in TMR was whether the arbitrator had exceeded his authority when he ordered the board of mental retardation (“the board”) to grant the grievant her earlier denied request to be transferred to another

Twinsburg v. Milano

110 N.E.3d 781 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2018

State v. Brown, 9th Dist. Summit No. 24831, 2010-Ohio-2328, ¶ 8, quoting State v. Xie, 62 Ohio St.3d 521, 526 (1992). … Brown at ¶ 9, quoting Smith at 264. {¶8} “A trial court’s obligations in accepting a plea depend upon the level of offense to which the defendant is pleading.” State v. Smith, 9th Dist.

State v. Davie, 2007-T-0069 (12-21-2007)

2007 Ohio 6940 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2007

State v. Brown , 166 Ohio App.3d 252 , 2006-Ohio-1796 , at ¶ 8 , citing State v. Green (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 352 , 359 . … Brown at ¶ 8 . {¶ 23} The issue of whether the trial court afforded Mr. Davie the right to allocution should have been raised in Mr. Davie's direct appeal.

Seltzer v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services

38 Ohio App. 3d 121 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1987

On or about April 16, 1985, the State Personnel Board of Review affirmed the order of removal. Appellant appealed the board’s order to the common pleas court. On March 11, 1986, the court affirmed the board’s order. … In Mullane v.

State v. Henson

2021 Ohio 38 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2021

State v. Jezioro, 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2016-10-088, 2017-Ohio-2587, ¶ 6, citing State v. Wisby, 12th Dist. Clermont No. CA2012-06-049, 2013- Ohio-1307, ¶ 29-33; and State v. Lunsford, 12th Dist. Brown No. … State v. Florence, 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2013-08-148, 2014- Ohio-2337, ¶ 26; see State v. Reynolds, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2000-11-035, 2001 Ohio App.

Love v. Hamilton Cty. Job. & Family Servs.

2025 Ohio 2498 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2025

board of a regional transportation improvement project may . . . … The closest, Maddox v. Bd. of Dirs. Children Servs. Bd., 2014-Ohio-2312, ¶ 12 (2d Dist.), permitted a suit against a county children services board of directors in its own name under Ohio’s Open Meetings Act.

Harrison v. Oh Vet. Med. Licensing Bd., Unpublished Decision (12-19-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2000

Motors Corp. v. … BROWN and KENNEDY, JJ., concur. 1 The relevant provisions of R.C. 4741.22 provide that the Board may, inter alia , reprimand, suspend, or revoke the license of a veterinarian who: (A) In the conduct of the person's practice

McDougald v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2021 Ohio 2004 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2021

No. 2019-1049JD) v. … Id., citing Brown v. Levin, 10th Dist. No. 11AP- 349, 2012-Ohio-5768, ¶ 14. {¶ 8} Appellant's sole assignment of error asserts the Court of Claims erred by failing to address his amended complaint.

State v. Tanksley

2016 Ohio 2963 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 13, 2016

State v. Terry, 2d Dist. … Both are necessary in order to authorize the parole board to exercise the authority that R.C. 2967.28 confers on that agency.” Id. at ¶ 15, citing State v.

In re K.S.

2014 Ohio 1347 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2014

DIANE V. … See Bates-Brown v. Brown, 11th Dist.

Marik v. Kb Compost Svcs., Unpublished Decision (3-19-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2003

Board of Zoning Appeals (Dec. 26, 1985), 9th Dist. No. 1424, at 6 (Baird, J., dissenting); Columbus v. Patterson (Dec. 9, 1982), 10th Dist. … CONCURS. 1 This case arose when Sheffield filed a declaratory judgment action against Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc ("BFI") in the trial court. Sheffield v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Ohio, Inc.

State v. Urvan

4 Ohio App. 3d 151 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1982

This conclusion comports both with fairness and the double jeopardy mandate of Brown v. Ohio, supra. … Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387 (1970),” Brown v.

State v. Trowbridge

2013 Ohio 1749 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 2013

See State v. … See State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Nos. C- 100309 and C-100310, 2011-Ohio-1029, ¶ 13, citing Kalish at ¶ 14 and 17. {¶57} Here the aggregate sentence imposed was not contrary to law.

Tarjanyi v. Ohio Dept. of Ins.

257 N.E.3d 430 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2024

law.’ ” Spitznagel v. … The trial court must give deference to the board’s resolution of factual conflicts unless they are clearly unsupportable. Clem D’s Auto Sales at ¶ 19, citing Jackson v.