Case law

State v. Butler

2011 Ohio 6366 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2011

[Cite as State v. Butler, 2011-Ohio-6366.] … State v. Butler, 7th Dist. No. 09 JE 1, 2010-Ohio-2537.

In re Contempt of Mallory-Nichols

227 N.E.3d 565 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 2023

State v. Local Union 5760, United Steelworkers of Am., 172 Ohio St. 75, 82, 173 N.E.2d 331 (1961), overruled on other grounds, Brown v. Executive 200, Inc., 64 Ohio St.2d 250, 416 N.E.2d 610 (1980), citing O’Brien v. … Brown, 64 Ohio St.2d at 252, 416 N.E.2d 610; Bright, 2020-Ohio-5180, 162 N.E.3d 153 at ¶ 23, citing Internatl. Union, 512 U.S. at 826, 114 S.Ct. 2552, 129 L.Ed.2d 642.

Tarjanyi v. Ohio Dept. of Ins.

257 N.E.3d 430 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2024

law.’ ” Spitznagel v. … The trial court must give deference to the board’s resolution of factual conflicts unless they are clearly unsupportable. Clem D’s Auto Sales at ¶ 19, citing Jackson v.

State v. Fluharty

2012 Ohio 4258 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2012

The next day, January 30, 2010, he moved into the Brown Avenue apartment. … State v.

In Matter of Robinson, 1-08-24 (10-14-2008)

2008 Ohio 5311 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 2008

In re Murray (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 155 , 157 , 556 N.E.2d 1169 , citing Stanley v. Illinois (1972), 405 U.S. 645 , 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 ; Meyer v. … See State v. Bradley (1989), 42 Ohio St. 3d 136 , 141-142 , 538 N.E.2d 373 , quoting State v.

In Re Stichtenoth

67 Ohio App. 2d 108 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1980

Columbus v. Fisher (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 25 ; Dayton v. Rogers (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 162 ; State v. Murrell (Hamilton Co. Ct. of Appeals No. C-77032, August 9, 1978), unreported; State v. … Stephens (1978), 57 Ohio App. 2d 229 ; State v. Claybrook (1978), 57 Ohio App. 2d 131 . See, also, Brown v. Texas (1979), 443 U.S. 47 .

Williams Creek Homeowners Assn. v. Zweifel, 07ap-689 (4-24-2008)

2008 Ohio 2434 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2008

Koos v. Cent. Ohio Cellular, Inc. (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 579 , 588 , citing Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 711 . … BROWN and KLATT, JJ., concur. *Page 1

Kipp v. Bd. of Zoning App of Stonelick Twp, Unpublished Decision (11-8-2004)

2004 Ohio 5903 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 2004

Henley v. Youngstown Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 90 Ohio St.3d 142 , 147 , 2000-Ohio-493 . … Smith v. Granville Twp.

City of Cincinnati Ex Rel. Kuntz v. City of Cincinnati

79 Ohio App. 3d 86 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1992

Hanley v. … Caspar v.

Pignatelli v. Bath Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2016 Ohio 5691 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2016

resolution.” {¶21} In Smith v. … Genovese v. Beckham, 9th Dist. Summit No. 22814, 2006-Ohio-1174, ¶ 12. R.C. 519.14 “does not vest township boards with power to grant conditional zoning certificates independent of the zoning resolution.

State v. Cottrell

2023 Ohio 3932 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 2023

State v. Boles, 12th Dist. Brown No. … State v. Hart, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2011-03-008, 2012-Ohio-1896, ¶ 45, quoting Martin at ¶ 32.

City of Westerville v. Kuehnert

50 Ohio App. 3d 77 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1988

In Garcia v. … Chevalier v. Brown (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 61 , 17 OBR 64, 477 N.E. 2d 623 .

In re Dissolve the Mansfield Railway, Light & Power Co.

21 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 95 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1914

the interest of the Southwestern Company, giving to the Southwestern a majority of the board of directors and the preferred stockholders a minority representation on the board. … of directors in the ease of Kleybolte & Co. et al v.

Harding v. Talbott, Exr.

57 Ohio App. 21 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1936

This court in the case of Anderson v Houpt, 43 Oh Ap page 538, ( 13 Abs 16 ) held: “No contract to pay for services as between parties occupying family relationship will be implied even though performer' is a stranger and … Answer: She paid up to the time of her death; she paid us $15 for the board, for her board only, but there was an understanding before she died, we were to be paid extra— ATTY. OLDS: — Finish your answer.

Copeland v. Pinter

2019 Ohio 409 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2019

board's decision to the common pleas court.’ … Nutter v. Concord Tp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 11th Dist.

State v. Washington

2023 Ohio 4484 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2023

State v. Brown, 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 2002-T-0077, 2003-Ohio-7183, ¶ 52, citing Thompkins at 390, and State v. … State v. Brown, 11th Dist. No. 2016-A- 18 Case No. 2023-L-029 0021, 2017-Ohio-9259, 103 N.E.3d 32, ¶ 46, quoting State v. Bickerstaff, 11th Dist.

Pratt v. Kirby Co.

19 Ohio App. 3d 188 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1984

Claimant appealed this decision to the Board of Review, Bureau of Employment Services. A referee of the Board of Review conducted a hearing, and, subsequently, affirmed the administrator’s decision. … The Supreme Court has held that “[wjhether work is ‘suitable work’ * * *, will ordinarily be a question of fact for determination by the trier of the facts. * * *” Pennington v.

Ryland v. Tracy

96 Ohio App. 3d 392 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1994

Appellees challenged the use of this method for tax years 1988 and 1989, and the Board of Tax Appeals held in Ryland v. … Wing v.

Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Combined Health District

191 Ohio App. 3d 405 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 2010

Co. v. … The taxpayers lack standing vis-á-vis CHD and the board {¶ 24} The rule for common-law taxpayer standing was established in State ex rel Masterson v.

State ex rel. Hile v. Zangerle

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 150 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1928

At that time the board of county commissioners was without power or authority to consider his claim or make any adjustment of it at the expense of the county. … Commissioners v. Roush Bros. 50 OS. 103 .