Case law

Louisville City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Groffre Invests.

2022 Ohio 3492 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2022

R.C. 5717.05 requires more than a mere review of the decision of the Board of Revision. Black v. Bd. of Revision of Cuyahoga Cty., 16 Ohio St.3d 11, 14, 475 N.E.2d 1264 (1985). … Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Matthews v. Walker

34 Ohio App. 2d 128 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1973

In the case of Cox v. … Wishnek v. Gulla (1953), 67 Ohio Law Abs. 49 ; Richardson v. Doe (1964), 176 Ohio St. 370 .

State v. McDowell, 2-07-26 (3-24-2008)

2008 Ohio 1339 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2008

State v. Kirk , 3d Dist. No. 14-06-28, 2007-Ohio-1228 , ¶ 56 , citing Wheat v. U.S. (1988), 486 U.S. 153 , State v. Jones , 91 Ohio St.3d 335 , 343-44 , 2001-Ohio-57 . … Id., citing State v. Blakenship (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 534 , 558 , citing Morris v. Slappy (1983), 461 U.S. 1 , 13 ; State v. Crew , 8th Dist.

State v. Pearson, 2008ca00046 (12-15-2008)

2008 Ohio 6672 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2008

See State v. Fanning (1982) 1 Ohio St.3d 19 , 437 N.E.2d 583 ; State v. Klein (1991), 73 Ohio App.3d 486 , 597 N.E.2d 1141 ; State v. Guysinger (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 592 , 621 N.E.2d 726 . … State v. Curry (1994), 95 Ohio App.3d 93 , 96 , 641 N.E.2d 1172 ; State v.

State ex rel. Ballard v. McKelvey

89 Ohio Law. Abs. 415 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1961

Preston, Director of Highways, v. Shaver, Recorder, 172 Ohio St., 111 , and the well rendered opinion of Judge Belt upon the trial of the matter. … Brown, P. J., Donahue and Griffith, JJ., concur.

Lenhart v. Toledo Urology Associates, Inc.

48 Ohio App. 2d 249 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1975

Brown, P. J. … Group Health Assn. v. Moor (D.C.Cir. 1938), *250 24 F. Supp. 445 ; Complete Service Bureau v. San Diego County Med. Soc. (1954), 43 Cal. 2d 201 , 272 P. 2d 497 ; State Electro-Medical Institute v.

IBM Corp. v. Franklin Cty., Unpublished Decision (11-30-2006)

2006 Ohio 6258 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 2006

Co. v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1972), 32 Ohio St.2d 28 . 2. … As such, the Ohio Supreme Court has held that "'full compliance with R.C. 5715.19 and 5715.13 is necessary before a county board of revision is empowered to act on the merits of a claim.'" Id., quoting Stanjim Co. v.

Konesky v. Wood County Agricultural Society

164 Ohio App. 3d 839 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 2005

Gallagher v. Cleveland Browns Football Co. (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 427, 432 , 659 N.E.2d 1232 . … .) {¶ 21} In Brown v.

State v. Wendel, Unpublished Decision (12-23-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1999

See, e.g. , State v. Filler (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 731 ; State v. Coppock (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 405 ; State v. Brown (Apr. 16, 1999), Pickaway App. No. 98CA27, unreported, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 1983 . … Brown , supra ; and the Second District Court of Appeals in State v. Coppock , supra ; State v. Ruble (June 26, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16726, unreported, 1998 WL 425503 ; and State v.

Althof v. State, Unpublished Decision (1-31-2006)

2006 Ohio 502 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2006

In Cos, Inc. v. … In Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Twp.

Kiser v. Wilberforce University

33 Ohio Law. Abs. 438 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1941

Valentine for board and room of plaintiff, board at the halls of the University entered at intervals, and other gifts and donations. … Seeds, Grain & Hay Co. v Conger, 83 Oh St 169. Toledo Edison Co. v Roberts, 50 Oh Ap 74. Bettman et v Sporkin et, 6 Oh Ap 23.

State v. Thierbach

92 Ohio App. 3d 365 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1993

See, generally, State v. Penn (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 720 , 576 N.E.2d 790 (primacy); State v. Brown (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 349, 352 , 588 N.E.2d 113, 115 (interstitial); State v. … Brown, supra, 63 Ohio St.3d at 352 , 588 N.E.2d at 115 (possible interpretation of New York v. Belton [1981], 453 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 ).

State v. Ferguson, 06-Ca-11 (5-11-2007)

2007 Ohio 2352 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 11, 2007

LEXIS 3271, 34 . {¶ 16} Significantly, the remedy in Mickens-Thomas v. … See State v.

State v. Florence

2014 Ohio 2337 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2014

State v. Lunsford, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2010-10- 021, 2011-Ohio-6529, ¶ 24-25. … State v. Fields, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2009-05-018, 2009-Ohio-6921, ¶ 11.

State v. Cooper

66 Ohio App. 3d 551 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1990

See, State v. Brown (Nov. 29, 1988), Montgomery App. No. 11217, unreported; State v. Aaron (May 21, 1985), Franklin App. No. 83AP-1202; State v. Chambers (Sept. 28, 1982), Montgomery App. No. 7360, unreported. … In United States v.

Rodway, Recr. v. Botterel

56 Ohio App. 497 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1937

The payments of the balance of installments wore to be mads when the board of managers declared that the finances were sufficient to warrant the construction . of the club house. … Martin v Penna. Ry. Co., 37 F. (2d) 892. The word “guarantee” in the contract is to be .interpreted according to the common, ordinary, and usual meaning.

Small's Sand and Gravel v. Howard Twp., Unpublished Decision (5-17-2006)

2006 Ohio 2451 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 2006

Partnership v. City of Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals, (Jul 21, 2005), 8 Dist. … Kisil v.

Clifton Springs Distilling Co. v. State

12 Ohio App. 226 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1919

In the case of Roseberry v. … In the case of State of Ohio v.

Jones v. Dayton Bd. of Edn.

7 Ohio App. Unrep. 56 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1990

Hoover v. Sumlin, supra, Peterson v. Teodosio (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 161 , 297 N.E. 2d 113 . … Felder v. Casey (1988), 487 U.S. 131 , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed. 2d 123 . Martinez v. El Paso County (1987 D. Colo.) 673 F. Supp. 1030 . Watson v. McGee (1981 D.C. Ohio) 527 F. Supp. 234 .

Lovejoy v. MacEk

122 Ohio App. 3d 558 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1997

See Brown v. Lavery (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 745 , 622 N.E.2d 1179 ; accord Turek v. Hogan (June 28, 1993), Butler App. No. CA92-09178, unreported, 1993 WL 229395 . … In Brown , the Ninth District Court of Appeals was faced with a case very similar to the instant one. The defendant in Brown also left Ohio to attend college out of state.