Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.49s

  • Gabel v. Miami East School Board

    169 Ohio App. 3d 609 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2006

    OTR v. … . {¶ 43} In Lucas v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Emmert v. Board of Education

    7 Ohio App. 2d 116 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1966

    City Boards of Education. … Clerk of the Hardin County Board of Education.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Norris v. Board of Education

    12 Ohio Law. Abs. 639 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 11, 1932

    Sec 4757 GC provides: “No member of the board shall have, directly or indirectly, any pecuniary interest in any contract of the board or be employed in any manner for compensation by the board of which he is a member except … In the case of State ex v Board of Education, 42 Oh St 374, it is held: “1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hersberger v. Ohio Aviation Board

    58 Ohio Law. Abs. 432 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1950

    Each of these, however, was a factual question which could be resolved only by the Ohio Aviation Board. Farrand v. State Medical Board, 151 Oh St 222. We therefore find no merit in this first assignment. … In State of Ohio v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. Board of Education

    30 Ohio Law. Abs. 408 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1939

    The record discloses' that the board upon receiving the regulations and standards notified the bus drivers and later most of them met with the board. … Cusack v McGrain et, 136 Oh St 27. It is also true that in instances regulations issued pursuant to a statute may by force of that statute be made a part of a contract.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Creath v. Board of Comm'rs

    11 Ohio Law. Abs. 38 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1930

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matthews v. Board of Review

    70 Ohio Law. Abs. 488 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1953

    In Hinkle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Haas v. Board of Education

    1 Ohio Law. Abs. 702 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1923

    The Board of Education then issued bonds for this purpose in the amount of $75,000 and sold them to the Industrial Commission. … The Board of Education did not abuse its discretion in determining the character of the improvements to be made and the amount of bonds to be issued. 99 OS. 369 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tichenor v. Board of Review

    104 Ohio App. 441 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1957

    The question of disqualification then came on for decision by the Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, and, pursuant to a hearing, this Board ruled contrary to the decision of the administrator. … Thereupon the question came on for hearing in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, which court affirmed the decision of the Board of Review.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wiler v. Board of Review

    81 Ohio App. 439 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1947

    That application was disallowed by the board of review. … The board of review sets forth the following assignments of error: 1. The court erred in reversing the decision of the *443 referee of the board of review. 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harshman v. Board of Commissioners

    8 Ohio App. 37 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1917

    . *38 It appears that, in the year 1913, upon petition of certain landowners, the board of county commissioners of Greene county ordered the improvement of Beaver Creek by straightening, widening, deepening and changing the … The principle announced in the case of Commissioners of Greene County v. Harbine, 74 Ohio St., 318 , justifies us in applying a strict construction of Section 6443, General Code, as applied to living streams.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Seitz v. Ohio State Medical Board

    24 Ohio App. 154 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1926

    In State Board of Medical Examiners v. Friedman, 150 Tenn., 152 , 263 S. … In Indiana Board of Pharmacy v. Haag, 184 Ind., 333 , 111 N. E., 178 , it was determined that the habitual *161 and unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors is gross immorality.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Durning v. Board of Elections

    85 Ohio Law. Abs. 321 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1960

    Upon consideration of these four claims of failure on the part of the petitioners to the Board of Elections, one of the defendants in these cases, we find and hold that the first claim that the petition filed with the Board … This is not a matter of the discretion of the Board of Elections in the exercise of its administrative duties, but is a question of whether or not that board followed the provisions of the statute, or if it failed to follow

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Lynch

    5 Ohio Law. Abs. 547 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1926

    Lynch filed an answer denying the right of recovery by the Board, and a cross-petition seeking to recover an additional sum. … Warner of Cleveland, for Board of Education; Messrs. Guthery, Guthery, Binyon & Williams, of Cleveland, for Lynch.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fetterman v. Board of Ed.

    3 Ohio Law. Abs. 370 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1923

    This case was instituted in the Common Pleas by Hyman Fetterman against the Board of Education of the Cleveland Heights School District. … Upn hearing, a permanent injunctin was issued and the Board was restrained from publishing the survey.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sander v. Board of Review

    92 Ohio App. 534 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1951

    mailing date November 15 1950, and, as indicated, signed by board members Ralph W. … Such description of the finding appealed from is held sufficient in Moore v. Foreacher, Recr., 156 Ohio St., 255 , 102 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Emblamers

    46 Ohio Law. Abs. 556 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1946

    See Gannon v Gallagher, 145 Oh St 170; State, ex rel v Court, 144 Oh St 461. … Homan v The Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors of Ohio, 135 Oh St 321, which case was decided on May 3, 1939, and prior to the enactment of §154-73 GO.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Education

    3 Ohio Law. Abs. 524 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1925

    Bd. of Education v. State, 35 OS. 555 . 2. Although foregoing case related to a rural district it would apply equally to the ease at bar. 3. … The discretion of a Board of Education, while broad, does not permit a segregation purely on the ground of race or color. 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Giovanetti v. Ohio State Dental Board

    66 Ohio App. 3d 381 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1990

    Shady Acres Nursing Home, Inc. v. Board (1976), 50 Ohio App.2d 391 , 4 O.O.3d 393 , 364 N.E.2d 44 . The Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County adopted the same approach in Ohio State Medical Bd. v. … Neff v. Westerville (Mar. 4, 1986), Franklin App. Nos. 85AP-289, 85AP-512 and 85AP-605, unreported, 1986 WL 2928 . See, also, Quick v. Wolfe (Aug. 20, 1981), Franklin App. No. 81AP-561, unreported, 1981 WL 3422 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Griner v. Minster Board of Education

    128 Ohio App. 3d 425 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1998

    Massaro [v. Vernitron Corp. (D.Mass.1983), 559 F.Supp. 1068 ], at 1073 (citing Mack v. Cape Elizabeth School Board [C.A.1, 1977], 533 [sic, 553] F.2d 720, 722). … Wing v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.