Case law

State v. Kendrick

52 Ohio Law. Abs. 383 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1948

See State v Lindway: “3. … (Fifth paragraph of the syllabus of Nicholas v City of Cleveland, 125 Oh St, 474, and Browning v City of Cleveland, 126 Oh St, 285, Overruled.) ” It appears further that the defendant objected to the use of this evidence

State v. Killingsworth

2020 Ohio 724 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 2020

-7- Case No. 1-19-27, 1-19-28 Ohio-5733, ¶ 15, citing State v. Brown, 3d Dist. … See State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton Nos. C-080320 and C-080321, 2009-Ohio-1889, ¶ 26; State v. Rodgers, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 06AP-808, 2007- Ohio-1501, ¶ 20.

State v. Carr

173 Ohio App. 3d 436 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2007

The officers stopped the boat and boarded it without permission, ostensibly to make a safety inspection. Upon boarding the boat, the officers noticed a moderate odor of alcohol. … In State v.

State ex rel. Matthews v. Zangerle

15 Ohio Law. Abs. 661 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1933

Snyder v Board of Park Commrs. of Cleveland Metropolitan Park Dist., 125 Oh St 336. State ex Bryant v Akron Metropolitan Park Dist., and State ex Wadsworth v Zangerle et, 120 Oh St 464, affirmed in 281 U. S. 74 . … Shook et v Mahoning Valley Sanitary Dist., 120 Oh St 449. McNab v Board of Park Commrs., etc., 108 Oh St 497. The petition of the plaintiff is dismissed, at the costs of the relator, and exceptions may be noted.

State v. Scott

8 Ohio App. 3d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1983

Appellant explained that he purchased the unit from Captain Brown of the Washington Court House Police Department for $100. … According to appellant, an electronics expert manufactured the unit and Brown connected it to appellant’s television set.

Cousino v. State, L-06-1368 (5-1-2007)

2007 Ohio 2142 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 2007

Agency v. … Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 421 ; State ex rel. Alford v.

Doyle v. Fairfield Machine Co., Inc.

120 Ohio App. 3d 192 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 1997

Yeazel v. Brown (Feb. 23, 1996), Montgomery App. No. 15347, unreported, 1996 WL 76231 . … See, also, Jacobs, 60 Ohio St.3d 111 , 573 N.E.2d 609 (information provided to licensing boards pursuant to R.C. 2305.25 health care boards qualifiedly privileged); Hahn, 43 Ohio St.2d 237 , 72 O.O.2d 134 , 331 N.E.2d 713

Summers v. Slivinsky

141 Ohio App. 3d 82 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2001

Welco Industries, Inc. v. … In Neelon v. Conte (Nov. 13, 1997), Cuyahoga App.

Covatch v. Cent. Ohio Sheltie Rescue, Inc.

2016 Ohio 1241 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2016

No. 2014CVF 24571) v. … BROWN and SADLER, JJ., concur.

State v. Ward

2011 Ohio 254 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 2011

See State v. Roberts, 180 Ohio App.3d 666, 2009-Ohio-298, ¶13, citing Cabrales, 118 Ohio St.3d 54, at ¶14. If such a finding is made, the defendant can be convicted of the offenses. State v. Brown, 3d Dist. … State v. Gomez, 3d Dist. No. 16-04-10, 2005-Ohio-1606, ¶20, citing State v. Brown (1995), 107 Ohio App.3d 194, 200.

State v. Webb, 07ca43 (3-3-2008)

2008 Ohio 901 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 2008

State v. … Blakemore v.

Hodkinson v. Ohio State Racing Comm'n

96 N.E.3d 1178 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2017

Ohio Boys Town, Inc. v. Brown, 69 Ohio St.2d 1, 4 (1982). C. … BROWN and DORRIAN, JJ., concur.

State v. White

155 Ohio App. 3d 215 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 2003

.” {¶ 3} R.C. 2967.11, which outlines the Parole Board’s authority to extend a stated prison term for certain violations of prison rules, was held unconstitutional by the Ohio Supreme Court as a violation of the doctrine … Bray v. Russell (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 132 , 729 N.E.2d 359 , syllabus.

Hollins v. Anderson

2012 Ohio 1261 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2012

[Cite as Hollins v. Anderson, 2012-Ohio-1261.] … No. 11CA010001 Appellants v.

Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Health v. Harper

2017 Ohio 6882 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2017

Bd. of Health v. Harper, 2017-Ohio-6882.] … Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280, 292-293, 1996 Ohio 107, 662 N.E.2d 264 (1996). Specifically, the moving party must support the motion by pointing to some evidence in the record of the type listed in Civ.R. 56(C).

Dillon v. McNeel

68 Ohio App. 3d 219 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1990

The court, citing as authority the case of Schiff v. … It is the duty of the Assessment Equalization Board “to determine whether the complaining property owner’s land will benefit from the improvement and, if so, to what extent. * * * ” 5 Tolson v.

Alqaryuti v. Hampton Place

2025 Ohio 1120 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2025

The Hampton Place Board conducted a hearing with Ms. Alqaryuti and S.H. regarding the incident. … Schierbaum v. Ohio Dept. of Edn., 2024-Ohio-1196, ¶ 18 (9th Dist.), citing State v.

6957 Ridge Rd., L.L.C. v. Parma Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2013 Ohio 4028 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2013

Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219, 450 N.E.2d 1140 (1983). {¶12} A board of zoning appeals maintains wide latitude in deciding whether to grant or deny a variance. Culkar v. … v.

Denis Copy Co. v. Limbach

76 Ohio App. 3d 768 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1992

PPG Industries, Inc. v. Kosydar (1981), 65 Ohio St.2d 80 , 19 O.O.3d 268 , 417 N.E.2d 1385 . The court of appeals is bound by the record that was before the BTA and may not substitute its judgment for that of the board. … Assn., supra; Pato Foods, Inc. v. Lindley (1982), 7 Ohio App.3d 22 , 7 OBR 24, 453 N.E.2d 1274 , paragraph three of the syllabus; see, also, Alcan Aluminum Corp. v.

State, Ex Rel. Dawn v. Kyle

75 Ohio App. 30 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 8, 1944

Police Department of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, relator was discharged on or about October 5, 1942, under circumstances which did not preclude his receiving the pension provided by Section 45 of the Rules adopted by the Board … Juhlman v Commrs., et al., 122 Oh St, 355.