Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.75s
6 Ohio App. 2d 94 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1964
Wayman, the owner; of a house and lot in Akron, Ohio, located directly across a city street from a parking lot belonging to, and maintained by, the Board of Education of the Akron City School District. … If this action sought a money judgment for damages, We would have no difficulty in affirming the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas on the authority of Board, of Education of Cinc innati v. Volk, 72 Ohio St. 469 .
Cited 0 timesPublished7 Ohio Law. Abs. 309 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1929
The statute provides for such allowance in certain cases brought by a taxpayer against county commissioners and municipalities, but there is no such statute covering a similar action brought against a board of education.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Zangerle
15 Ohio Law. Abs. 377 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1933
Cited 0 timesPublishedFarrand v. State Medical Board
55 Ohio Law. Abs. 282 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1949
The remaining errors assigned all relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the ruling of the State Medical Board. … On this question we find the evidence submitted to the Board was competent and relevant to the issues and was sufficient to warrant the conclusions therein announced.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Ohio Law. Abs. 701 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1923
Held: Nothing in the Code authorizes the parent of a pupil to provide school facilities for his children and charge it to the local board, of education. … Walters, for Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Ohio Law. Abs. 753 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1923
Board ordered $30,000 worth of bonds issued. Court of Appeals, in affirming the judgment, held: 1. … Hoskot, for Board of Education.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 Ohio Law. Abs. 652 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1934
Cited 0 timesPublished8 Ohio Law. Abs. 414 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1930
Whether or not it is sufficient is a mixed question of law and fact and its determination is exclusively within the jurisdiction of the county board of education. … And in this respect lies the difference between the instant case and State ex rel Stipe v. Carr, et al, Summit County. The demurrer to the petition is sustained. Mauck and Blosser, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedReid v. Architectural Board of Review
119 Ohio App. 67 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1963
The Supreme Court of Ohio in paragraph six of the syllabus in the case of Benjamin v. City of Columbus, 167 Ohio St., 103 , 146 N. … Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. Wieland, 269 Wis., 262 , 69 N. W. (2d), 217 ; Froelich v. City of Cleveland, 99 Ohio St., 376 , 124 N. E., 212 ; City of Cincinnati v. Correll, 141 Ohio St., 535 , 49 N.
Cited 10 timesPublished6 Ohio App. Unrep. 293 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1990
I would affirm the board and reverse the trial court which I feel may not have applied the correct standard of review.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPhillips v. Board of Education
21 Ohio App. 194 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1924
Niemes v. Niemes, 97 Ohio St., 145 , 119 N. E., 503 ; Wilson v. Mitchell, 101 Pa., 495 . … Farrer v. State, 2 Ohio St., 54 ; Holman v. Riddle, 8 Ohio St., 384 ; Hulet v. Barnett, 10 Ohio, 459; Kent v. State, 42 Ohio St., 426 ; Goins v. State, 46 Ohio St., 457 , 21 N. E., 476 ; Corrigan v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState v. Brown, 07ap-255 (9-25-2007)
2007 Ohio 5016 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2007
See, generally, State v. Newton , Franklin App. No. 01AP-1443, 2002-Ohio-5008 , at ¶ 3. … See, e.g., City of Pepper Pike v. Doe (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 374, 377 (citing Roe *Page 3 v. Wade [1973], 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 ; Griswold v. Connecticut [1965], 381 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished82 Ohio Law. Abs. 571 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1959
See Commissioners of Hamilton County v. Mighels, 7 Oh St 110, which was *573 decided by the Supreme Court of Ohio in 1857 and which overruled a previous case (Commissioners of Brown County v. … Mighels, supra, page 124, closed with the following comments concerning the overruling of the case of Commissioners of Brown County v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOhio State Medical Board v. Zwick
59 Ohio App. 2d 133 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1978
See Brown v. United States (1958), 356 U. S. 148 ; see generally, *139 annotation, Testifying in civil proceeding as waiver of privilege against self-incrimination, 72 A. L. R. 2d 830. … Mayers, v. Gray (1926), 114 Ohio St. 270 , substantial compliance with those rules will better facilitate a proper hearing. Bucyrus v. State Dept. of Health (1929), 120 Ohio St, 426, 430.
Cited 9 timesPublished5 Ohio Law. Abs. 463 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1927
Board of Education v. Boehm, 102 OS. 292 . Attorneys — H. L. Peeke and Messrs. Krue-ger & Rosino for Board of Ed., Henry Hart and J. F. Hertlein for Windau, et; all of Sandusky. … , was filed with the County Board of Education.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 Ohio Law. Abs. 326 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1930
It was stated by counsel representing the School Board that there was not one syllable of testimony in this cause indicating the Board had been moved to take this action for political or religious reasons. … It was also urged by counsel for the School Board that the action taken by the Board does not and would not operate as a discharge of the above named persons, and that suggests itself as a proper observation, especially in
Cited 0 timesPublishedFarrand v. State Medical Board
51 Ohio Law. Abs. 159 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1947
Prom the action of the State Medical Board in revoking the said licenses the appellant perfected an appeal to the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County which affirmed the decision of the State Medical Board. … See Youngstown Municipal Railway v City of Youngstown 147 Oh St 221.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCashdollar v. Board of Education
12 Ohio App. 298 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1920
The Board of Education relies upon an exception created by law. … The board would not, therefore, in our judgment, be relieved from payment of said compensation by said order of the Board of Health suspending schools for an indefinite period.
Cited 0 timesPublished28 Ohio Law. Abs. 616 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1938
State ex v Board of Agri., 95 Oh St, 276. State ex v Witter, 110 Oh St 216. … Vansuch v State ex, 112 Oh St 688. State ex v Witter, 114 Oh St 122.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStrawser v. Board of Education
12 Ohio Law. Abs. 101 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1931
Therefore, we must assume that had he been given an opportunity to appear before the board, as he contends was his right, he could not have changed certain facts upon which the board claims to have acted. … Smith’s responsibility are that some four *102 years ago, and within the personal knowledge of at least two members of the board, Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna