Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.58s

  • McDonald v. Canton Med. Edn. Found., Inc.

    2013 Ohio 3659 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 2013

    McDonald is not able to sit for the Internal Medicine Boards to become a board certified physician in internal medicine. … Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280, 292, 662 N.E.2d 264 (1996).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jennings v. Xenia Twp. B.Z.A., Unpublished Decision (1-4-2007)

    2007 Ohio 28 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 2007

    {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on an administrative appeal by Christy Jennings and Craig Simonson from the trial court's December 29, 2005, decision and entry upholding the Xenia Township Board of Zoning Appeals' determination

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Armatas v. Haws

    110 N.E.3d 759 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2018

    Hickman v. … See also State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Altman

    2022 Ohio 2380 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2022

    State v. Glover, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2015-01-002, 2015-Ohio-3707, ¶ 37. {¶16} The inconsistencies Altman emphasizes in an attempt to discredit White's testimony were addressed at trial. … State v. Lunsford, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2010- 10-021, 2011-Ohio-6529, ¶ 17.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sprague v. Simon

    144 Ohio App. 3d 437 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 14, 2001

    Mootispaw v. Eckstein (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 383, 385 , 667 N.E.2d 1197, 1198 . The Supreme Court stated in Dresher v. … Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 , 622 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 . The Brown court stated that “we review the judgment independently and without deference to the trial court’s determination.”

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Village of Kirtland Hills v. Sulc, 2007-L-026 (8-17-2007)

    2007 Ohio 4224 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 2007

    See State v. Miller (1997), 117 Ohio App. 3d 750 , 761 ; State v. … Id. at 427. {¶ 23} Moreover, appellant's reliance on State v. Brown , 166 Ohio App. 3d 638 , 2006-Ohio-1172 , where we found the Second Appellate District Court's holding in State v. Beagle , 2d Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Harding

    198 N.E.3d 941 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 2022

    State v. Boles, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2016-07-014, 2017-Ohio-786, ¶ 19. Accordingly, "a trial court may dismiss a postconviction relief petition on the basis of the doctrine of res judicata." … State v. Thomas, 6th Dist. Wood No. WD-09-025, 2010-Ohio-394, ¶ 22. Res judicata bars a petitioner from "re-packaging" evidence or issues that either were or could have been raised. State v. Brown, 12th Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. White

    155 Ohio App. 3d 215 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 2003

    .” {¶ 3} R.C. 2967.11, which outlines the Parole Board’s authority to extend a stated prison term for certain violations of prison rules, was held unconstitutional by the Ohio Supreme Court as a violation of the doctrine … Bray v. Russell (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 132 , 729 N.E.2d 359 , syllabus.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Groves v. Dayton Public Schools

    132 Ohio App. 3d 566 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1999

    Fahnbulleh v. Strahan (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 666, 667 , 653 N.E.2d 1186, 1187 , citing Phung v. Waste Mgt., Inc. (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 100 , 23 OBR 260, 491 N.E.2d 1114 , overruled on other grounds by Kulch v. … See Baker & Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Lucci, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)

    2006 Ohio 4666 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2006

    Keenan v. Calabrese (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 176 , 177-178 ; see, also, State ex rel. Brown v. Logan, 11th Dist. No. 2004-T-0088, 2004-Ohio-6951 , at ¶ 4 . … Donlin v. Hubbard Twp., 11th Dist.

    Cited 9 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Hooks

    2016 Ohio 3138 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 24, 2016

    State v. … See also In re Sealing of the Record of Brown, 10th Dist.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Health v. Harper

    2017 Ohio 6882 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2017

    Bd. of Health v. Harper, 2017-Ohio-6882.] … Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280, 292-293, 1996 Ohio 107, 662 N.E.2d 264 (1996). Specifically, the moving party must support the motion by pointing to some evidence in the record of the type listed in Civ.R. 56(C).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Schroeder

    2016 Ohio 849 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2016

    [Cite as State v. Schroeder, 2016-Ohio-849.] … CR0200701938 v. James E.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Cleveland Heights v. Gulko

    24 Ohio App. 2d 17 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1970

    Ed. 2d 536 ; Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc., v. McGinley (1961), 366 U. S. 582 , 6 L. Ed. 2d 551 ; and Braunfeld v. Brown (1961), 366 U. S. 599 , 6 L. Ed. 2d 563 ; although we find the dissents more persuasive. … We are similarly foreclosed from a new consideration of the Ohio constitutional question by State v. Kidd (1958), 167 Ohio St. 521 ; cf. State v. Footlick (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 206, 208 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Nally

    2015 Ohio 497 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 2015

    .); Save the Lake v. … Kimble Clay & Limestone v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sivey v. Boh, Unpublished Decision (9-12-2005)

    2005 Ohio 4838 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 2005

    In Henley v. … See also Ohio Bench Signs Unlimited v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Toyota Motor v. Spitzer Motors of Elyria, Unpublished Decision (6-27-2002)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2002

    Hartzog v. Ohio State Univ. (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 214 , 216 . … BROWN and KLATT, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hoops v. Jerusalem Township Bd., Tru., Unpublished Decision (4-10-1998)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1998

    Bank v. Saratoga Apts. (1989), 61 Ohio App.3d 127 , 129 . … See Barber v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Kendrick

    52 Ohio Law. Abs. 383 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1948

    See State v Lindway: “3. … (Fifth paragraph of the syllabus of Nicholas v City of Cleveland, 125 Oh St, 474, and Browning v City of Cleveland, 126 Oh St, 285, Overruled.) ” It appears further that the defendant objected to the use of this evidence

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hall v. Fenner

    18 Ohio Law. Abs. 701 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1935

    In the case of State ex v Board of Education, 115 Oh St page 55 the syllabus is as follows: “The action of mandamus does not constitute 'a chancery case within the purview of Article 4; §6 of the Ohio Constitution.” v In … In the case of State ex Davis v Board of Commissioners of Butler County, 9 Oh Ap Reports, at page 299 the syllabus is as follows: “An action in mandamus is a statutory proceeding and not a chancery case, and its appeal does

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.