Case law

Pataskala v. Fop, Unpublished Decision (9-28-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1999

Lorain City Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 257 , paragraph two of the syllabus. ("Courts must afford due deference to the State Employment Relations Board's interpretation of R.C. … BOWMAN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Leon v. State Bd. of Psychology

8 Ohio App. Unrep. 356 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1990

University of Cincinnati v. *358 Conrad (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 108 ; Berezoski v. Ohio State Medical Bd. (1988), 48 Ohio App. 3d 231 ; Mofu v. State Medical Bd. (1984), 21 Ohio App. 3d 182 ; Snyder v. … The judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded for reinstatement of the board's order. Judgment accordingly. JOHN V. CORRIGAN, P.J., and SWEENEY, J., concur.

State v. West

2020 Ohio 3434 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2020

Wise v. … See, e.g., State v. Brown, 2d Dist. No. 25285, 2013-Ohio-1579, ¶ 29-33 (citing Tumey and Fulminante and holding that the trial court's "interrogation" of the defendant was structural error).

Rice v. Campbell

71 Ohio App. 477 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1942

Genl., v. Huwe, 103 Ohio St. 546 , 134 N.E. 456 . … National Bronze Aluminum Foundry Co., 135 Ohio St. 191 , 20 N.E.2d 232 ; Schaefer v. First National Bank, 134 Ohio St. 511 , 18 N.E.2d 263 ; State, ex rel. Masters, v.

In Re Estate of Evans

71 Ohio App. 127 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1941

Miss Smith denied that the diamonds were wrapped in the brown paper. There is a controversy as to whether the word appearing before the name of Mrs. Jones on the brown paper was “gift” or “left”. … The case of Bolles v Trust Company, 132 Oh St 21, is cited on this point.

Union Stock Yards Co. v. City of Hillsboro

191 Ohio App. 3d 564 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2010

See, e.g., Brown v. … See Wright v.

Green Local Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Manolakis

2019 Ohio 3250 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2019

OF TAX APPEALS SUMMIT COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO REVISION CASE No. 2017-1706 Appellee v. … Bd. of Edn. v. Stark Cty.

State v. Arnold

44 Ohio Law. Abs. 45 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1945

The essential facts in this case are, that on July 5, 1944, at about 4 o’clock a. m. the Brown Derby, a cafe, was entered by two masked men. … In these confessions they fully stated the details of the planned robbery, how it was carried out, their part in its commission, stated that Moon did the killing, that McKinney was the second man in the Brown Derby cafe,

On Point v. City of Cleveland, Unpublished Decision (11-2-2006)

2006 Ohio 5728 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 2006

Moreover, the trial court must presume that the board's determination is valid unless the party opposing the determination can demonstrate that the determination is invalid. Rotellini v. … . {¶ 9} In Henley v.

State v. Smith

2022 Ohio 1291 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 2022

See State v. Smith, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. … See State v.

City of Middletown v. Campbell

69 Ohio App. 3d 411 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1990

Appellant claims that she could not be convicted of violating this statute because Christina did not attend a program offered by a community board of mental health or a county board of mental retardation and developmental … The phrase “attending programs offered by community boards of mental health and county boards of mental retardation and development disabilities” modifies the word “person,” not the word “child.”

Doyle v. State, Unpublished Decision (9-5-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 2002

Wilson v. Calabrese (Jan. 18, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70077; State ex rel. Smith v. McMonagle (July 17, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70899. 3 Brown v. Rogers (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 339 , 650 N.E.2d 422 ; Cornell v. … Zanders v. Ohio Parole Board (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 421 , 696 N.E.2d 594 ; State ex rel. Alford v. Winters (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 285 , 685 N.E.2d 1242 ; In Re: Woods (Apr. 26, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 79467; Clark v.

Richard Halegua Fantastic Things, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Commercial Insurance

88 Ohio App. 3d 391 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1993

*394 Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge, concurring. I agree with the majority that summary judgment was properly entered for Crum & Forster in this case. … But even if that were not found to be a proper basis on which to deny coverage, and even if Halegua had an insurable interest in the property based upon the economic interest analysis set forth in Phillips v.

State v. Hale

2023 Ohio 1057 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2023

State v. Roseberry, 5th Dist. Licking No. 2009-CA-78, 2010-Ohio-1112, ¶ 21, citing State v. Jackson (Apr. 25, 2006), Pickaway App. No. 05CA12 (April 25, 2006), citing State v. Brown, Montgomery App. … Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 52, 61 L.Ed.2d 357, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2641 (1979). See, also, State v.

State ex rel. Dunlap v. Violet Twp. Bd. of Trustees

2013 Ohio 2295 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 30, 2013

Zimmerman v. … Long v.

State v. Cowen

167 Ohio App. 3d 233 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2006

See State v. Campbell (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 320, 326 , 738 N.E.2d 1178 . {¶ 13} The state cites our decision in State v. McBride (Jan. 26, 2001), Montgomery App. … State v. Brown, 166 Ohio App.3d 252 , 2006-Ohio-1796 , 850 N.E.2d 116, ¶ 13 . Here, the trial court’s failure to provide Cowen or his counsel with the opportunity to address the court is reversible error.

Eastman v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.

67 Ohio App. 3d 318 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1990

Upon appeal to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review ("Board of Review"), a hearing was held before a referee on March 16, 1988. … Similarly, in Talberg v. Commissioner (Minn.

Akron v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

2013 Ohio 1213 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2013

Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. … See also SERB v.

In re A.K.

2012 Ohio 1767 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 2012

Brown testified that upon completing a physical examination of E.C., she noticed mild irritation of E.C.’s genital area. … State v.

Gateways to Better Living, Inc. v. Creasy

16 Ohio App. 3d 259 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 1984

See Akers v. Montgomery Cty. Welfare Dept. (Dec. 29, 1983), Franklin App. No. 83AP-561, unreported. … For, while the director argues that plaintiff must use personnel who are licensed by the nursing board, that board, the pharmacy board and the Department of Health all deny having any authority to approve a training program