Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.54s

  • Fuehrer v. Board of Education

    4 Ohio App. Unrep. 376 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Libis v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    33 Ohio App. 2d 94 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1972

    Justice Frankfurter, United States v. Morgan, 313 U. … Anshe Chesed Congregation, v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Price v. K.A. Brown Oil and Gas, L.L.C.

    2014 Ohio 2298 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 27, 2014

    [Cite as Price v. K.A. Brown Oil and Gas, L.L.C., 2014-Ohio-2298.] … It is a basic rule of corporate law that a contract is not authorized by the corporation unless it is executed or authorized by the board of directors. Kimball v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tisone v. Board of Liquor Control

    1 Ohio App. 2d 126 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1964

    Undoubtedly that young lady is more familiar with board files than any or all board members; but we cannot make the law, only administer it.” … makes reference to the case of Allesandro v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Chirila v. Ohio State Chiropractic Board

    145 Ohio App. 3d 589 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2001

    In Korn v. Ohio State Med. … Brown, J., concurs. Peggy Bryant, P. J., concurs separately.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Board of Commissioners

    8 Ohio App. 30 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1917

    Conrad v. Davies, Auditor, 14 C. C., N. S., 475, 477; Dorgan v. Columbus et al., *36 12 Dec., 121, 128, and Elyria Gas & Water Co. v. City of Elyria, 57 Ohio St., 383. Attention is called to the case of Caldwell v. … A very well-considered case, however, and one regarded as worthy of notice here, is that of Gray v. Gibson et al., 12 N. P., N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kyser v. Board of Elections

    33 Ohio App. 2d 52 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1972

    C. 3503.25 which requires that the Board of Elections cancel the registration of all voters who have not voted at least once in the two next preceding calendar years or transferred his registration within that period.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Braunlin v. Board of Education

    10 Ohio Law. Abs. 247 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1931

    It appears from the record that the grantor of the plaintiff interrupted an ac•tion by the board to dispose of the prop'- ■ erty, which intention to sell the property ,was-thereafter rescinded by the board. … It undoubtedly is the right of the board of education to remove this building when it is finally abandoned, and if the board does not intend agaifi* to use it for sqlfool purposes they should remove it or (dispose of it within

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Hess

    30 Ohio App. 446 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1928

    This case grows out of applications of the board of education of the city school district of the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, to the state *447 tax commission, for exemption from taxation of certain property described in the … The board of education prosecutes error to this court, seeking a reversal of those decisions. The question here is, Is the property involved exempt from taxation under the Constitution and laws of Ohio?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McMenamy v. Board of Education

    35 Ohio App. 194 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1929

    school committee consisting of two members of each of the boards constituting the joint district. … Section 7669 provides that if the boards have sufficient money in the treasury to purchase a site and erect such building, or if there is a suitable building in either district owned by the board of education that c,an be

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benzing v. Board of Education

    41 Ohio App. 468 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932

    V. … An observation by Chief Justice Marshall, in the case of State ex Myers v Industrial Commission, 105 Oh St, 103, at page 111, 136 NE 896 , 898, is apropos wherein he states: “It is a matter of common knowledge that in many

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bertsch v. Board of Elections

    17 Ohio Law. Abs. 405 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1934

    Predicating our conclusion upon the recent pronouncement of the Supreme Court in the. case of Sullivan, v State ex, 125 Oh St 387, the second syllabus of which reads as follows — : “2. … By virtue of §4785-78 GC the determination of the board, in the absence of fraud or corruption, is final and is not subject to judicial review.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holbrook v. Board of Review

    22 Ohio App. 3d 88 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1985

    Appellee appealed and the board of review denied an application to institute further appeal. An appeal was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull County. … This court has recently decided Boggs v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Employment Services (Feb. 4, 1983), Trumbull App. No. 1117, unreported, written by Judge Hofstetter.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Merillat v. Board of County Commissioners

    73 Ohio App. 3d 459 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 3, 1991

    Specht, v. Bd. of Edn. (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 178 , 20 O.O.3d 191 , 420 N.E.2d 1004 . … Kunkle v. Fulton County Board of Commissioners, Case No. 3: 89CV7102, and the second captioned William P. Hickey v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Tubbs Jones v. Brown

    76 Ohio App. 3d 154 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1991

    Gallets also voted to add Brown and Torok to fill the newly created seats on the board. Since this meeting, the size of the board has remained five: Gallets, Kane, Denzine, Brown and Torok. … Ellis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Natoli v. Ohio State Dental Board

    177 Ohio App. 3d 645 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 2008

    Lassiter v. Dept. of Social Serv. (1981), 452 U.S. 18, 24 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 ; Clayman v. State Med. Bd. (1999), 133 Ohio App.3d 122, 127 , 726 N.E.2d 1098 , quoting State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. Indus. … Haj-Hamed v. State Med. Bd., Franklin App. No. 06AP-351, 2007-Ohio-2521 , 2007 WL 1501779 , at ¶53. Thus, we must consider whether the board violated Dr.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • DeBlanco v. Ohio State Medical Board

    78 Ohio App. 3d 194 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1992

    DeBlanco also relies upon Konigsberg v. … However, as the medical board concedes, this court in Bouquett v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Roth v. Public Employees Retirement Board

    44 Ohio App. 2d 155 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1975

    State v. Nelson (1894), 52 Ohio St. 88 ; State v. Gardner (1898), 58 Ohio St. 599 ; State, ex rel. Webber, v. Felton (1908), 77 Ohio St. 554 ; City of Xenia v. Schmidt. (1920), 101 Ohio St. 437 ; List v. … Williams v. Donough (1902), 65 Ohio St. 499 ; Winslow-Spacarb, Inc., v. Evatt (1945), 144 Ohio St. 471 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Contris v. Board of Liquor Control

    105 Ohio App. 287 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1957

    See Van Ingen v. Berger, 82 Ohio St. 255 , 92 N.E. 433 . … the Revised Code and the decision of the Supreme Court in Andrews v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dowler v. Board of Review

    6 Ohio App. 2d 117 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1966

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.