Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.12s
256 N.E.3d 797 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 2024
AAAA Ents., Inc. v. … Id., citing Weiss v. Porterfield, 27 Ohio St.2d 117 (1971); Lenart v. Lindley, 61 Ohio St.2d 110, (1980); Spithogianis v.
Cited 2 timesPublished82 Ohio App. 3d 47 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1992
Hamersville *49 v. Reque (Jan. 27, 1992), Brown App. No. CA91-01-003, unreported, 1992 WL 12780 . In the cause at bar, appellant failed to file her notice of appeal within ten days after the mayor rendered judgment.
Cited 1 timesPublished114 Ohio App. 3d 144 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1996
The Dayton City Board of Education accepted and paid for American States’ uninsured motorist policy. … Co. v.
Cited 23 timesPublished69 Ohio App. 193 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1942
In Shipp v Brown, 20 N. P. … Ferguson v Long, 341 Mo. 182 , 107 S. W. (2d) 7 at 10 ; Hoyt v Stark, 66 Pac. 223 , 134 Cal. 178 ; and In Re Carniaglia’s Guardianship, 134 Cal. App. 106 , 24 Pac. (2d) 944 .
Cited 10 timesPublished2011 Ohio 2160 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 4, 2011
[Cite as State v. Alhajjeh, 2011-Ohio-2160.] … Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 ; State v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Stanek v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
4 Ohio App. 3d 63 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1982
Relator’s election was denied by the district hearing officer and that denial was affirmed by the Regional Board of Review. The commission declined relator’s appeal from the regional board. … Comm. v. Royer (1930), 122 Ohio St. 271, 273 ; State, ex rel. Waller, v. Indus. Comm. (Franklin App. 1943), 38 Ohio Law Abs. 515, 520 , affirmed 142 Ohio St. 193 [ 27 O.O. 166 ].
Cited 5 timesPublished37 Ohio App. 574 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1930
City of Youngstown v. Moore, 30 Oh St. 133. … Masters v. Freeman, supra. See also — Taylor v. Brown, 92 Oh St 287. Bartges v. O’Neil, 13 Oh St 72.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRink v. Dept. of Rehab. and Corr.
2018 Ohio 3633 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2018
See also Lewis; Johnson v. Dept. of Corr., 10th Dist. No. 81-106 (Apr. 23, 1981); Lillie v. S. Ohio Corr. Facility, 10th Dist. No. 80AP-162 (Apr. 17, 1980); Hampton v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist. … BROWN, P.J., and BRUNNER, J., concur. ________________
Cited 1 timesPublished61 Ohio Law. Abs. 557 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1951
This was clearly pointed out by this Court in the case of State v. … See also State v. Mueller, 41 Oh Ap 102; and State v. Method, 68 Oh Ap 66. We find further that the Court did not err in its general and special charges to the jury.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGoebel v. Colonial Lane Improvement Assn.
2025 Ohio 863 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2025
The jury heard testimony from the Goebels, neighbors, Association board members, a landscaper, and an engineer. … Chance v. BP Chems., Inc., 77 Ohio St.3d 17, 23 (1996). In other words, there must be (1) an unauthorized intentional act, and (2) entry on land in another’s possession. Brown v. Scioto Cty.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith v. Upper Sandusky Bd. of Ed.
2 Ohio App. Unrep. 146 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1990
Frances v. … Re-employment by the Board at a later date would not entitle appellant to a continuing contract under the terms of R.C. 3319.11. Appellee cites State, ex rel. Hura v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDinucci v. Lis, 88751 (8-9-2007)
2007 Ohio 4056 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2007
Brown v. County Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . Lemmo v. House of Larose Cleveland, Inc. , Cuyahoga App. No. 82182, 2003-Ohio-4346 . … Epling v. Pacific Intermountain Exp. Co. (1977), 55 Ohio App.2d 59 , 62 , 379 N.E.2d 239 . Brown v. Crestmont Cadillac , Cuyahoga App.
Cited 2 timesPublished90 Ohio Law. Abs. 99 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1962
Brown, P. J. Under the undisputed facts of this case the claim was not served upon the administrator within four months as required by Section 2117.06, Revised Code. … Redifer Bus Co. v. Lumme, Admr., 171 Ohio St., 471 . There is no abuse of discretion and no other assignment of error well made. Judgment affirmed. Donahue and Griffith, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGammell v. Trustees, Unpublished Decision (3-8-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1999
Welco Industries v. Applied Cos. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 344 , 346 . … See Pressley v. Industrial Commission , (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141 . The board of trustees had no clear legal duty to reinstate appellant's appointment.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHuntington National Bank v. Burch
157 Ohio App. 3d 71 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 2004
Bank v. Brown (Jan. 21, 1994), Montgomery App. … Bank v. Brown (Jan. 21, 1994), Montgomery App. No. 13976, 1994 WL 12475 , at * 3.
Cited 9 timesPublished131 Ohio App. 3d 399 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1999
Children Services Board.” … In State v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState v. Slocum, 2007-A-0081 (8-15-2008)
2008 Ohio 4157 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2008
State v. Barnett , 11th Dist. No. 2006-P-0117, 2007-Ohio-4954 , ¶ 18 , citing State v. Brown , 166 Ohio App.3d 638 , 2006 Ohio 1172 * * *." … Brown , supra, at ¶ 25 ; State v. Mook , 11th Dist.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGranger Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Klubnik, Unpublished Decision (1-6-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1999
The board appealed to this Court, and this Court reversed the judgment of the common pleas court, holding that it had improperly substituted its judgment for that of the board. See Klubnik v. Granger Twp. … Grava v. Parkman Twp. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 379 ,381.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2016 Ohio 5607 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2016
State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009–Ohio– 6434, 920 N.E. 2d 958, ¶ 11, 22. {¶13} In State v. … See State v. Murphy, 5th Dist. Muskingum No.
Cited 1 timesPublished55 Ohio App. 2d 99 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1977
MacDonald (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 66 ; State v. Lee (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 208 ; and State v. Singer (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 103 . In the MacDonald case Justice Paul Brown cited with approval the earlier cases of State v. … In his opinion concurred in by the other members of the Court, Justice Brown said: “The present speedy-trial statutes are the kind of state action which Barker v. Wingo, supra [ 407 U. S. 514 ], contemplated.
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna