Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.42s
Sutherland v. trotwood/madison B of E, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2002
Ohio Furniture Co. v. Mindala (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 99 , 101 . This holding stems from and reflects "a basic tenet of Ohio jurisprudence that cases should be decided on their merits." Perotti v. … State v. Edwards (1952), 157 U.S. 175 .
Cited 0 timesUnpublished61 Ohio App. 3d 246 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1988
See Houston v. Hill (1987), 482 U.S. 451 , 107 S.Ct. 2502 , 96 L.Ed.2d 398 ; Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. … Boos v. Barry (1988), 485 U.S. 312 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 . However, we cannot address appellant’s challenge because we may consider only evidence found in the record, Raine v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBecdir Constr. Co. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
2022 Ohio 4762 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2022
Co. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2022-Ohio-4762.] … Feist v. Plesz, 9th Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEvans Investment Co. v. Limbach
51 Ohio App. 3d 104 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1988
Appellant relies upon the cases of Ralston Steel Car Co. v. Ralston (1925), 112 Ohio St. 306 , 147 N.E. 513 , and Carney v. Cleveland City School Dist. Pub. … Appellant’s assignment of error is overruled, and the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Strausbaugh and Bowman, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublished2014 Ohio 3045 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2014
State v. Crosby, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-348, 2012-Ohio-6202; State v. Brown, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-292, 2012-Ohio-5903; State v. Diallo, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-388, 2013-Ohio-1248, ¶ 17; Bayless at ¶ 20. … At that point, the formerly accused is, at most, in the same position as any other subject of a criminal investigation.' " Brown at ¶ 18, quoting United States v. MacDonald, 456 U.S. 1, 8-9 (1982).
Cited 5 timesPublishedEdward Rose of Ohio, Inc. v. McLaughlin
22 Ohio App. 2d 190 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1970
Mika, v. Lemon (1959), 170 Ohio St. 1 ; Hocking Power Co. v. Harrison (1925), 20 Ohio App. 135 ; Garzia v. Murray (Common Pleas 1940), 33 Ohio Law Abs. 85 ; Ohio Power Co. v. … Mika, v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSchul v. Ely, Unpublished Decision (2-2-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2001
Carter v. Schotten (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 89 , 92 fn. 2, or federal court under its pendent jurisdiction, Huntington Mtge. Co. v. Shanker (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 144 , 154 . … Brown v. Dayton (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 245 , 247 . In this regard, the concept of privity has never been clearly defined.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHoman v. Franklin Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals
2018 Ohio 3717 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2018
Chapter 2506 governs appeals from decisions by agencies of political subdivisions, such as township zoning boards.” Genovese v. Beckham, 9th Dist. … Gerzeny v.
Cited 1 timesPublished2020 Ohio 1495 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 2020
Under R.C. 2967.03, the decision of the parole board is discretionary. State ex rel. Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 141 Ohio St.3d 375, 2014-Ohio- 4270, 24 N.E.3d 1132, ¶ 19. … parole board.
Cited 0 timesPublished2014 Ohio 655 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2014
See State v. Brown, 2d Dist. … State v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCase Western Res. Univ. v. Ohio Bur. Emp., Unpublished Decision (1-17-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002
The decision of the unemployment board of review may only be reversed by a reviewing court if the decision is unlawful, unreasonable or against the manifest weight of the evidence. Irvine v. Unemp. Comp. … Irvine v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review (1985), 19 Ohio St.3d 15 , 18 , 19 Ohio B. 12, 482 N.E.2d 587 ; Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Roach (1947), 148 Ohio St. 511 , 36 Ohio Op. 167 , 76 N.E.2d 79 . Koval v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2020 Ohio 1232 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2020
See State v. Finnell, 1st Dist. Hamilton Nos. C-140547 and C- 140548, 2015-Ohio-4842, ¶ 41-45; State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-120327, 2013-Ohio-2720, ¶ 43; English, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. … .); State v. Brown, 4th Dist. Hocking No. 93CA20, 1994 WL 312905, *3 (June 29, 1994).
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Cromwell v. Montgomery County Treasurer
80 Ohio App. 357 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 7, 1947
State, ex rel, Enos v Stone, 92 Oh St 63. In State, ex rel, Horner, 16 N. P. (N. … In the case of Talbott v State, ex rel, supra, the fees in question were collected before the adoption of the Code of 1910, and, consequently, the salary law, as it was passed in 1906, applied.
Cited 9 timesPublished118 Ohio App. 3d 815 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1997
Marianna Brown Bettman, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I can accept the fact that in certain circumstances a toy gun could be a deadly weapon, as statutorily defined in R.C. 2923.11(A), but this is not such a case. … See, generally, State v. Luckey (App. 1974), 69 O.O.2d 111 , 322 N.E.2d 354 (interpreting earlier statute, but indicating result would be the same under present one); State v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAutomotive Supermarkets, Inc. v. City of Willoughby
27 Ohio App. 3d 238 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1986
Appellee then appealed the board’s decision to the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2506.01 ei. seq. … (Footnote omitted.) 10 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d (1979) 373, Buildings, Zoning and Land Controls, Section 169, citing, inter alia, Henle v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2018 Ohio 4693 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2018
Brown testified that Powell had said that he (Powell) and Kurtz had an argument about Powell’s catching her cheating and that Powell “shook her up.” … Copher and Brown saw Powell with his cell phone, but not with another cell phone.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSmith-Huff v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
2015 Ohio 5238 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2015
Additionally, the endcap was gray in color while the flooring was brown. … BROWN, P.J. and SADLER, J., concur. _________________
Cited 3 timesPublishedDavis v. Public Empl. Retire. Bd., Unpublished Decision (12-13-2005)
2005 Ohio 6612 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 2005
According to relators, Smith v. State Teachers Retirement Board, Franklin App. No. 01AP-1281, 2002-Ohio-4391 (" Smith II "), demonstrates the fallacies of this assumption. … Brown, P.J., and Bryant, J., concur. EXHIBIT A State ex rel.
Cited 6 timesUnpublished2019 Ohio 412 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2019
Hubbell v. … Id. at ¶17. {¶42} This court subsequently applied Lambert in determining whether a treasurer and superintendent of a school board had been sued in both their individual and official capacities. Kravetz v.
Cited 7 timesPublished2026 Ohio 1906 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2026
State v. … .); Brown, 2025-Ohio-1391, at ¶ 25 (2d Dist.).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna