Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.42s

  • Sutherland v. trotwood/madison B of E, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2002)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2002

    Ohio Furniture Co. v. Mindala (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 99 , 101 . This holding stems from and reflects "a basic tenet of Ohio jurisprudence that cases should be decided on their merits." Perotti v. … State v. Edwards (1952), 157 U.S. 175 .

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rossman v. Conran

    61 Ohio App. 3d 246 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1988

    See Houston v. Hill (1987), 482 U.S. 451 , 107 S.Ct. 2502 , 96 L.Ed.2d 398 ; Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. … Boos v. Barry (1988), 485 U.S. 312 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 . However, we cannot address appellant’s challenge because we may consider only evidence found in the record, Raine v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Becdir Constr. Co. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

    2022 Ohio 4762 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2022

    Co. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2022-Ohio-4762.] … Feist v. Plesz, 9th Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Evans Investment Co. v. Limbach

    51 Ohio App. 3d 104 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1988

    Appellant relies upon the cases of Ralston Steel Car Co. v. Ralston (1925), 112 Ohio St. 306 , 147 N.E. 513 , and Carney v. Cleveland City School Dist. Pub. … Appellant’s assignment of error is overruled, and the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Strausbaugh and Bowman, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Loel

    2014 Ohio 3045 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2014

    State v. Crosby, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-348, 2012-Ohio-6202; State v. Brown, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-292, 2012-Ohio-5903; State v. Diallo, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-388, 2013-Ohio-1248, ¶ 17; Bayless at ¶ 20. … At that point, the formerly accused is, at most, in the same position as any other subject of a criminal investigation.' " Brown at ¶ 18, quoting United States v. MacDonald, 456 U.S. 1, 8-9 (1982).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Edward Rose of Ohio, Inc. v. McLaughlin

    22 Ohio App. 2d 190 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1970

    Mika, v. Lemon (1959), 170 Ohio St. 1 ; Hocking Power Co. v. Harrison (1925), 20 Ohio App. 135 ; Garzia v. Murray (Common Pleas 1940), 33 Ohio Law Abs. 85 ; Ohio Power Co. v. … Mika, v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Schul v. Ely, Unpublished Decision (2-2-2001)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2001

    Carter v. Schotten (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 89 , 92 fn. 2, or federal court under its pendent jurisdiction, Huntington Mtge. Co. v. Shanker (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 144 , 154 . … Brown v. Dayton (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 245 , 247 . In this regard, the concept of privity has never been clearly defined.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Homan v. Franklin Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

    2018 Ohio 3717 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2018

    Chapter 2506 governs appeals from decisions by agencies of political subdivisions, such as township zoning boards.” Genovese v. Beckham, 9th Dist. … Gerzeny v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Cooper

    2020 Ohio 1495 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 2020

    Under R.C. 2967.03, the decision of the parole board is discretionary. State ex rel. Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 141 Ohio St.3d 375, 2014-Ohio- 4270, 24 N.E.3d 1132, ¶ 19. … parole board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Howard

    2014 Ohio 655 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2014

    See State v. Brown, 2d Dist. … State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Case Western Res. Univ. v. Ohio Bur. Emp., Unpublished Decision (1-17-2002)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002

    The decision of the unemployment board of review may only be reversed by a reviewing court if the decision is unlawful, unreasonable or against the manifest weight of the evidence. Irvine v. Unemp. Comp. … Irvine v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review (1985), 19 Ohio St.3d 15 , 18 , 19 Ohio B. 12, 482 N.E.2d 587 ; Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Roach (1947), 148 Ohio St. 511 , 36 Ohio Op. 167 , 76 N.E.2d 79 . Koval v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Struckman

    2020 Ohio 1232 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2020

    See State v. Finnell, 1st Dist. Hamilton Nos. C-140547 and C- 140548, 2015-Ohio-4842, ¶ 41-45; State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-120327, 2013-Ohio-2720, ¶ 43; English, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. … .); State v. Brown, 4th Dist. Hocking No. 93CA20, 1994 WL 312905, *3 (June 29, 1994).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Cromwell v. Montgomery County Treasurer

    80 Ohio App. 357 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 7, 1947

    State, ex rel, Enos v Stone, 92 Oh St 63. In State, ex rel, Horner, 16 N. P. (N. … In the case of Talbott v State, ex rel, supra, the fees in question were collected before the adoption of the Code of 1910, and, consequently, the salary law, as it was passed in 1906, applied.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Bonner

    118 Ohio App. 3d 815 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1997

    Marianna Brown Bettman, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I can accept the fact that in certain circumstances a toy gun could be a deadly weapon, as statutorily defined in R.C. 2923.11(A), but this is not such a case. … See, generally, State v. Luckey (App. 1974), 69 O.O.2d 111 , 322 N.E.2d 354 (interpreting earlier statute, but indicating result would be the same under present one); State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Automotive Supermarkets, Inc. v. City of Willoughby

    27 Ohio App. 3d 238 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1986

    Appellee then appealed the board’s decision to the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2506.01 ei. seq. … (Footnote omitted.) 10 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d (1979) 373, Buildings, Zoning and Land Controls, Section 169, citing, inter alia, Henle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Powell

    2018 Ohio 4693 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2018

    Brown testified that Powell had said that he (Powell) and Kurtz had an argument about Powell’s catching her cheating and that Powell “shook her up.” … Copher and Brown saw Powell with his cell phone, but not with another cell phone.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Smith-Huff v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    2015 Ohio 5238 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2015

    Additionally, the endcap was gray in color while the flooring was brown. … BROWN, P.J. and SADLER, J., concur. _________________

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Public Empl. Retire. Bd., Unpublished Decision (12-13-2005)

    2005 Ohio 6612 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 2005

    According to relators, Smith v. State Teachers Retirement Board, Franklin App. No. 01AP-1281, 2002-Ohio-4391 (" Smith II "), demonstrates the fallacies of this assumption. … Brown, P.J., and Bryant, J., concur. EXHIBIT A State ex rel.

    Cited 6 timesUnpublished
  • Jane Doe 1 v. Licate

    2019 Ohio 412 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2019

    Hubbell v. … Id. at ¶17. {¶42} This court subsequently applied Lambert in determining whether a treasurer and superintendent of a school board had been sued in both their individual and official capacities. Kravetz v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re L.K.H-R.

    2026 Ohio 1906 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2026

    State v. … .); Brown, 2025-Ohio-1391, at ¶ 25 (2d Dist.).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.