Case law

Uniroyal Chemical Co. v. Kron

116 Ohio App. 3d 655 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1996

having jurisdiction over the discharges of the Mentor Wastewater Treatment Works, which is, of course, the Board of County Commissioners of Lake County. … While we accept the notion that the board of commissioners could have, in turn, delegated its enforcement power to an appropriate agent, such as the sanitary engineer, see Bell v. Bd. of Trustees of Lawrence Cty. Gen.

Bishop v. Bishop

188 Ohio App. 3d 98 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2010

Brown, 22 Ohio App. at 326 , 153 N.E. 864 . … the administration of the estate and also because appellant had not filed a claim against Carl, his administrator, or his estate. {¶ 20} Despite the holding in Brown , in Cook v.

State, Ex Rel. Hwy. Dept. v. Indus. Comm.

70 Ohio App. 2d 41 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1980

Said decision was vacated by order of the Dayton Regional Board of Review. … Bd. of Edn., v. Johnston (Franklin Co. Ct. of Appeals No. 77AP-910, June 22, 1978), unreported, affirmed (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 132 .

State v. Powers

98 Ohio App. 365 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1954

There is no question that Judge Houston is a duly qualified Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Brown County, Ohio. … The cases of Stiess et al. v. State, 103 Ohio St., 33 , *371 132 N. E., 85 , present facts very similar to those in this case.

Liston's Painting, Inc. v. Parzych, Unpublished Decision (4-22-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1999

Peyton v. Sun T.V. (1975), 44 Ohio App.2d 10 , 12 [ 73 O.O.2d 8 ]. In Tzangas, Plakas Mannos v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. … BROWN and BRYANT, JJ., concur.

Christensen v. Roumfort

20 Ohio App. 3d 107 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1984

All property, held by such board, and the proceeds of such property, shall be applied to the use and benefit of the proper denomination within this state.” … This same issue was determined in Maryland & Virginia Eldership of the Churches of God v. Church of God atSharpsburg (1970), 396 U.S. 367 .

State v. McCray

103 Ohio App. 3d 109 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1995

See Michelson v. … In United States v.

Baughman v. Baughman

173 N.E.3d 938 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2021

Franklin No. 09AP-1011, 2010-Ohio-4267, ¶ 5 (explaining that party signed non-compete agreement after petition for divorce was filed and that agreement would not conclude until five years after the divorce); Brown v. … Brown, 10th Dist.

Lewis v. Kocis

55 Ohio Law. Abs. 208 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1949

, dark brown”, whom she said was plaintiff and whom she described as being six feet tall, weighing “175, 180” pounds, and wearing a brown hat and “tweedish (over) coat-brown tweed”, and the “other (who) was fair complected … See Stork v. Evert, 47 Oh Ap 256, with reference to advice of counsel being a defense in an action for malicious prosecution; and Harig v.

Hoops v. Jerusalem Township Bd. of Tru., Unpublished Decision (4-10-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1998

Vermilion Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Novotny

2024 Ohio 2946 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2024

Blakemore v. … Frantz at 146, citing Lee v.

Marchel v. Marchel

160 Ohio App. 3d 240 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2005

Griffey v. … We agree that the laws of contract govern a separation agreement of a decree of dissolution, Brown v. Brown (1993), 90 Ohio App.3d 781, 784 , 630 N.E.2d 763 .

Griffis v. Klein, 22285 (5-9-2008)

2008 Ohio 2239 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 9, 2008

E.g., Becker v. Toulin (1956), 165 Ohio St. 549 , paragraph one of the syllabus; Wilson v. Harvey , 164 Ohio App.3d 278 , 2005-Ohio-5722 , 842 N.E.2d 83 , ¶ 18. … Whiteside v. Williams , Madison App. No. 2006-06-021, 2007-Ohio-1100 , ¶ 7 ; Moore v. P. W. Pub.

State v. McGee

2015 Ohio 4908 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2015

Id., citing State v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 84322, 2004-Ohio-6421. … State v. Wooten, 9th Dist. Lorain No. 13CA010510, 2014-Ohio-3980; State v. Brown, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 12 MA 118, 2014-Ohio-4158, ¶ 32; State v. Taylor, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 100315, 2014-Ohio-3134, ¶ 66-67.

Clickenger v. Patterson

22 Ohio Law. Abs. 204 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1936

of County Commissioners and in conformity with the order of the Board dated September 17th, 1930.” … The Supreme Court so held in the case of Morris v Bloomgren, supra; as will appear in the fifth branch of the syllabus. Whether or not the testimony of Mrs.

Fox, Admx. v. McCreary

103 Ohio App. 73 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1957

231, reads: “A person who asserts a right as legal or equitable owner of assets being administered in the estate is not required to present his ‘claim’ to the administrator before bringing an action. ’ ’ See, also, Carter v. … And, in Larimore v.

State ex rel. Morrow Cty. Job & Family Servs. v. Morrow Cty. Court of Common Pleas

2022 Ohio 2549 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 2022

SUNDIE BROWN EXECUTIVE Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. … Mason v.

In re Pitts

2024 Ohio 1618 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2024

Brown at ¶ 16; see also State ex rel. Master v. … State v. Brown, 38 Ohio St.3d 305, 308 (1988).

Tsirikos-Karapanos v. Ford Motor Co.

99 N.E.3d 1203 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2017

LaBonte v. Ford Motor Co., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 74855, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 4795, *18 (Oct. 7, 1999); see also Brown v. Cincyautos, Inc., S.D.Ohio No. 1:08cv372, 2009 U.S. Dist. … Id., citing Brown v. Bredenbeck, Franklin C.P. No. 74CV-09-3493, 1975 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 124 (July 24, 1975).

Harris v. Davis Construction Systems, Inc.

34 Ohio App. 3d 350 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1986

The court in Cohen v. … Suit must be brought against a board of education in its entirety in its corporate name and, excepting a statute to the contrary, not against the in *356 dividual officers of the board. See Halliday v.