Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Van-American Insurance v. Schiappa

    132 Ohio App. 3d 325 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 1999

    Appellants cite Ranney-Brown Distributors, Inc. v. E.T. Barwick Industries, Inc. (S.D.Ohio 1977), 75 F.R.D. 3 , and Goode v. … Industries, Inc. v. Vafla Corp.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Martin

    2013 Ohio 87 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2013

    [Cite as State v. Martin, 2013-Ohio-87.] … Brown, seeing that the message was signed “Earl[,]” called the number back on S.B.’s phone, and Mr. Martin answered. According to Ms. Brown, Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Hwy. Dept. v. Indus. Comm.

    70 Ohio App. 2d 41 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1980

    Said decision was vacated by order of the Dayton Regional Board of Review. … Bd. of Edn., v. Johnston (Franklin Co. Ct. of Appeals No. 77AP-910, June 22, 1978), unreported, affirmed (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 132 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Liston's Painting, Inc. v. Parzych, Unpublished Decision (4-22-1999)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1999

    Peyton v. Sun T.V. (1975), 44 Ohio App.2d 10 , 12 [ 73 O.O.2d 8 ]. In Tzangas, Plakas Mannos v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. … BROWN and BRYANT, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State ex rel. Intl. Union of Operating Engineers, Local 20 v. State Employment Relations Bd.

    2023 Ohio 1253 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2023

    No. 21CV-3508) v. … Local 92 v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. McCray

    103 Ohio App. 3d 109 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1995

    See Michelson v. … In United States v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. Miller

    161 Ohio App. 3d 145 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 20, 2005

    Brown by the prosecutor’s office provided Defendant the opportunity to view or copy the videotape. … State v. Bolden, Montgomery App. No. 19943, 2004-Ohio-2315 , 2004 WL 1043317 , at ¶ 51; State v. Franklin, Montgomery App. No. 19041, 2002-Ohio-2370 , 2002 WL 1000415 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Russell v. Dept of P. H. H. A. D.

    142 Ohio App. 3d 430 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2001

    On December 21, 1999, Russel appealed the City's order to the Akron Housing Appeals Board ("the Board"). The Board denied the appeal on January 18, 2000. … Smith v. Granville Twp. Bd. of Trustees (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 608 , 613 , quoting Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30 , 34 . In making this determination, we apply an abuse of discretion standard. Nauth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beyer v. Beyer

    64 Ohio App. 2d 280 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 3, 1979

    Singer v. Singer, unreported, Eighth Appellate District, No. 31904, decided May 3, 1973. 7 Finally, plaintiff argues in his answer brief that his social security should not be taken into consideration. … See Brown v. Brown, unreported, Eighth Appellate District, No. 31219, decided July 7, 1972, at page 4. The rationale is simply that the purpose of social security benefits is support.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Baughman v. Baughman

    173 N.E.3d 938 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2021

    Franklin No. 09AP-1011, 2010-Ohio-4267, ¶ 5 (explaining that party signed non-compete agreement after petition for divorce was filed and that agreement would not conclude until five years after the divorce); Brown v. … Brown, 10th Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Snow

    2015 Ohio 358 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2015

    State v. Brown, 115 Ohio St.3d 55, 2007-Ohio-4837, ¶ 53. The “[f]ailure to file a suppression motion does not constitute per se ineffective assistance of counsel.” (Internal quotations and citations omitted.) … Brown at ¶ 65. “In addition, deficient performance cannot be demonstrated where the record fails to disclose the circumstances surrounding the alleged Fourth Amendment violation.” State v. Kendall, 9th Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fox, Admx. v. McCreary

    103 Ohio App. 73 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1957

    231, reads: “A person who asserts a right as legal or equitable owner of assets being administered in the estate is not required to present his ‘claim’ to the administrator before bringing an action. ’ ’ See, also, Carter v. … And, in Larimore v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bianco v. Youngstown

    2020 Ohio 3584 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2020

    Angels for Animals, Inc. v. Beaver Township Board of Zoning Appeals, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 04 MA 80, 2004-Ohio-7209, 2004 WL 3090174, ¶ 15. Savon Ents. v. Boardman Twp. Tr., 7th Dist. … . {¶29} The party challenging the board's determination carries the burden of proof in rebutting the presumption of the correctness of the board's decision. Essroc Materials, Inc. v. Poland Twp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Davis Construction Systems, Inc.

    34 Ohio App. 3d 350 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1986

    The court in Cohen v. … Suit must be brought against a board of education in its entirety in its corporate name and, excepting a statute to the contrary, not against the in *356 dividual officers of the board. See Halliday v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ackley v. Niles City Park Commission

    68 Ohio App. 247 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1939

    See, McCloud v. City of Columbus, 54 Ohio St., 439 , 44 N. E., 95 ; City of Lancaster v. Miller, 58 Ohio St., 558 , 51 N. E., 52 ; Buchanan Bridge Co. v. Campbell, 60 Ohio St., 406 , 54 N. … E., 372 ; Village of Carthage v. Diekmeier, 79 Ohio St., 323 , 87 N. E., 178 ; Frisbie Co. v. City of East Cleveland, 98 Ohio St., 266 , 120 N. E., 309 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ogle v. Ogle

    128 N.E.3d 775 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 2018

    (Tr. at 179.) {¶ 71} In her objections to the magistrate's decision, appellant argued the magistrate erred in failing to conduct the test set forth in Brown v. … Gonzalez-Estrada v. Glancy, 8th Dist. No. 104570, 2017-Ohio-538, ¶ 10, citing Brown at ¶ 11.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baycliffs Corp. v. Village of Marblehead

    138 Ohio App. 3d 719 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2000

    Board were unreasonable or unlawful.” … Middletown v. McGee (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 284, 286 , 530 N.E.2d 902, 904 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Marchel v. Marchel

    160 Ohio App. 3d 240 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2005

    Griffey v. … We agree that the laws of contract govern a separation agreement of a decree of dissolution, Brown v. Brown (1993), 90 Ohio App.3d 781, 784 , 630 N.E.2d 763 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • American Bankers Insurance v. Leist

    117 Ohio App. 20 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1962

    See Wells v. Brown, 22 Ohio Law Abs., 472 ; Van Hee v. Jackson, 70 Ohio Law Abs., 509 . … J., and Brown, J., concur.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dayton v. Rhodus

    2012 Ohio 1776 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 2012

    [Cite as Dayton v. Rhodus, 2012-Ohio-1776.] … Id., citing Kisil v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.