Case law

Jacobs v. Board of County Commrs.

27 Ohio App. 2d 63 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 1971

Co. v. H. A. Stahl Co., 99 Ohio St. 47 , and including Matthews v. State Mortgage and Investment Co., 119 Ohio St. 419 , Sizemore v. Belser, 80 Ohio App. 383 , Foster v. Lee Motors, Inc., 102 Ohio App. 10 and Gest v. … S. v. Huck Mfg. (D. C. Mich, 1964), 227 F. Supp. 791 , affirmed 382 U. S. 197 , 86 S. Ct. 385 . See also, Ellis v. Carter (CA 9), 328 F. 2d 573 , Huber v.

Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Trowbridge

67 Ohio Law. Abs. 351 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1951

The court found the issues in this case to be the same as were presented in the case of Brown-Brockmeyer v. Holmes, 152 Oh St 411. … Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Holmes, supra, 415. Therefore, in the instant case the work was not at an unreasonable distance from the claimant's residence, as her residence was at Dayton, Ohio, when she quit her employment.

Hageman v. Board of Trustees

20 Ohio App. 2d 12 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1969

See Ackerman v. Port of Seattle (1960), 55 Wash. 2d 400 , 348 P. 2d 664 , 77 A. L. R. 2d 1344._ That case quotes the language of Mr. Justice Holmes in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (1922), 260 U. … In United States v. Causby (1946), 328 U. S. 256 , 90 L. Ed. 1206 , 66 S.

Batavia Village Board of Education v. Clermont County Board of Education

19 Ohio App. 18 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1923

funds of the local board to the county board fund. … the local board shall so report to ae county board of education.

Brown v. Kiechler Manufacturing Co.

35 Ohio C.C. Dec. 318 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1917

It was held in the case of Perry v. O’Neil, 78 Ohio St. 200 , 209, [ 85 N. … Drohan v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. 162 Mass., 435, 437 [ 38 N. E. 1116 ]; Manhattan *325 Life Ins. Co. v. Burke, 69 Ohio St. 294 [ 70 N. E. 74 ; 100 Am. St. 666].

Allesandro v. Board of Liquor Control

72 Ohio Law. Abs. 528 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1955

See also Wisler v. Wisler, 12 Abs 351 ; 3 Am. Jur. 40 . The judgment will be reversed and cause remanded to the Common Pleas Court for further proceedings according to law. … DiCillo, Inc., v. Zoning Board, 59 Abs 513 . The bill of exceptions provided for under this Act must be allowed and signed by the trial judge. Sec. 2321.07 R. C.

Lies v. Ohio Veterinary Medical Board

2 Ohio App. 3d 204 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1981

See Universal Camera Corp. v. … See, also, Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1972), 405 U.S. 156 ; Brinkley v.

State v. Brown, 23455 (6-13-2007)

2007 Ohio 2885 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2007

State v. Franks (Oct. 7, 1998), 9th Dist. No. 18767, at *3, citing United States v. Pollard (C.A.D.C.1992), 959 F.2d 1011 , 1021 ; United States v. Caro (C.A.9, 1993), 997 F.2d 657 , 659 ; United States v. … See State v. Brown , 167 Ohio App.3d 239 , 2006-Ohio-3266 , at ¶ 13 .

Bartchy v. State Board of Education

170 Ohio App. 3d 349 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2007

See, also, Smith v. Granville Twp. … Univ. of Cincinnati v.

Sullivan v. Board of Commissioners

111 Ohio App. 281 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1960

This court, in Bey v. Wright Place, Inc., 108 Ohio App., 10 , at page 14, 160 N. … Nagy v. City of Akron, 27 Ohio App., 250 , 161 N. E., 226 ; City of Hamilton v. Ashbrook, 62 Ohio St., 511 , 57 N. E., 239 ; Mason v. Commrs. of Fulton County, 80 Ohio St., 151 , 88 N. E., 401 , 131 Am. St.

Bell v. Board of Trustees

21 Ohio App. 2d 49 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1969

The decision was appealed to the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, consolidated with three similar appeals, and reported in Abbott v. Myers, 20 Ohio App. 2d 65 . … Kendrick, v. Masheter, Dir. of Hwys., 176 Ohio St. 232 .

Fuller-Brown v. Ken She, Ltd.

2022 Ohio 863 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2022

[Cite as Fuller-Brown v. Ken She, Ltd., 2022-Ohio-863.] … Delphine Fuller-Brown v. Ken She, Ltd. L-21-1103 Thomas J.

Wheeler v. Board of Education

30 Ohio App. 2d 136 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1972

C. 3317.14, as adopted effective December 1, 1967, was provided by the Supreme Court of Ohio in King v. Bd. of Edn., 15 Ohio St. 2d 117 . … The duty to set salary schedules is clearly a statutory duty of the board.

Jones v. Board of Education

60 Ohio App. 2d 138 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1978

The cases cited by Jones in support of a contrary res ult— viz., Goldberg v. Kelly, (1970), 397 U. S. 254 , Kinsella v. Board (W.D. N.Y. 1974), 378 F. Supp. 54 , and State v. … Shannon and Keefe, JJ., concur. 1 See Logan Natural Gas & Fuel Co. v. Chillicothe (1901), 65 Ohio St. 186 , and State, ex rel. Cromwell, v.

Hallett v. Stow Board of Education

89 Ohio App. 3d 309 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1993

This includes all matters relating to the condition of the hillside and any failure on the part of the Board or the School to repair the [hole]. … In Vallish v. Copley Bd. of Edn. (Feb. 3, 1993), Summit App.

Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. Hamilton County Board of Zoning Appeals

110 Ohio App. 3d 527 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1996

The Symmes Township Board of Trustees (“the trustees”) appealed the board decision to the court of common pleas pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2506. … In Willoughby Hills v. C.C.

Bales v. Board of County Commissioners

30 Ohio App. 249 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1928

McMahon v. Second Ave. Ry. Co., 75 N. Y., 231, 236 .” … The real issue in the Weiher v.

State ex rel. Brisco v. Brown

2022 Ohio 3445 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2022

Brisco v. Brown, 2022-Ohio-3445.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Bryon L. … LeRoy v.

Roy v. Ohio State Medical Board

80 Ohio App. 3d 675 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1992

See, e.g., Feldstein v. … In Haley v. Med.

Board of Township Trustees v. Gilbert

6 Ohio App. 39 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 1915

Peele, petitioner for the improvement, was at the time the petition was filed and during the pendency of the proceedings, a member of the board of township trustees, and that by reason of his holding his said position he … The record shows that he took no part, as trustee, in the proceedings by the board of trustees in relation to this matter, but that all proceedings were conducted by the other members of the board, who constituted a quorum