Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.33s

  • Kerg v. Atlantic Tool & Die Co.

    176 Ohio App. 3d 437 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 2008

    . {¶ 57} The majority relies on Page v. … Burgos, however, testified that the safety boards were never used to retrieve parts, and no one had ever told him to use the safety boards. Moreover, his trainer did not always use safety boards.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burke v. Burke

    2014 Ohio 1402 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2014

    Brown v. Executive 200, Inc., 64 Ohio St.2d 250, 253, 416 N.E.2d 610 (1980). … Brown at 253.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Battle

    2016 Ohio 2917 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 11, 2016

    State v. … Bray v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Fritz v. Gray

    20 Ohio App. 26 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1925

    Genl., v. … Atty., v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Widman

    184 Ohio App. 3d 705 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2009

    Kramer v. Angel’s Path, L.L.C., 174 Ohio App.3d 359, 2007-Ohio-7099, 882 N.E.2d 46, ¶ 17, citing Brown, 87 Ohio App.3d at 712-713. … Brown, 87 Ohio App.3d at 713, 715; Allen Freight Lines, Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp. (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 274, 276, 595 N.E.2d 855.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • McVey v. City of Cincinnati

    109 Ohio App. 3d 159 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1995

    Stores Co. v. McBride (1931), 124 Ohio St. 264 , 178 N.E. 12 ; Welch v. Rollman & Sons Co. (1942), 70 Ohio App. 515 , 25 O.O. 310 , 44 N.E.2d 726 . … See Winwood v. Dayton (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 282 , 525 N.E.2d 808 ; Bolding v. Dublin Local School Dist., supra.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Eichner v. Celtic Life Insurance

    73 Ohio App. 3d 281 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1991

    In Brown v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (C.A.6, 1989), 876 F.2d 546, at 551 , the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals adopted the criteria formerly announced in Donovan v. … Moreover, the court in Donovan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cook v. Sears

    9 Ohio App. 2d 197 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1967

    Carl Gerber, President of the Board of Education of Harpster-Little Sandusky Village School District, Wyandot County, Ohio 5. Carl V. … In the case of Spence, Admx., v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. McGee

    2011 Ohio 1456 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2011

    She seems to contend that such an explicit finding was necessary in order to sentence her to a jail term. {¶13} Appellant relies on Brown v. … Olmsted Tp. v. Riolo (1988), 49 Ohio App.3d 114, 117, citing Smedley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McClintick v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Rev., Unpublished Decision (9-28-2007)

    2007 Ohio 5110 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2007

    Circuit Courts, Ltd., v . Carne (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 306 , 308 . … See, also, Luther Hills Ltd. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revisions (May 5, 2000), 6th Dist. No.

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Sharpe v. Sharpe

    85 Ohio App. 3d 638 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1993

    In Pennsylvania v. … Renfro v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hobbs v. Pickaway-Ross Career & Technology Ctr. Bd. of Edn.

    2022 Ohio 921 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2022

    HOBB’S EMPLOYMENT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD OF REVIEW {¶9} “R.C. 3319.081 governs the termination of non-teaching employees of a local school board.” Durham v. Pike Cty. … Highland No. 12CA19, 2013-Ohio-2112, ¶ 11, citing Benincasa v. Stark County Board of MRDD, 5th Dist. Stark No. 2003CA00350, 2004-Ohio-4941, ¶ 19, citing Doll v. Stark County Board of MRDD, 5th Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Grimes & Hauer, Inc. v. Pollock

    102 Ohio App. 535 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 1954

    Ct., 161 , wherein it held that the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive jurisdiction in certain cases involving interstate commerce. … Capital Service, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board, 347 U. S., 501 , 98 L. Ed., 887 , 74 S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Jolly, 22811 (12-12-2008)

    2008 Ohio 6547 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2008

    Mapp v. … State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bliss Realty, Inc. v. Darash

    64 Ohio Law. Abs. 339 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1952

    In the case of Lewis Auditor v. Taylor, 18 O. C. C. 443, this principle of law was clearly determined. … The Supreme Court in the case of Miller v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Image Group of Toledo, Inc. v. Holland-Springfield Twp. Joint Economic Dev. Zone

    93 N.E.3d 343 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2017

    Bd. of Commrs. v. … See Brinkman v. Miami Univ., 12th Dist. Butler No.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tiger Corp. v. Call

    8 Ohio App. 3d 158 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1982

    Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co. (1937), 132 Ohio St. 271 [ 8 O.O. 41 ]. … Rail Road Co. v. Commissioners (1852), 1 Ohio St. 77 , at 88.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Myers

    2014 Ohio 3658 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2014

    State v. Barnes, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2010-06-009, 2011-Ohio-5226, ¶ 81, quoting State v. Walker, 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2006-04-085, 2007-Ohio-911, ¶ 26. … State v. Lunsford, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2010-10-021, 2011-Ohio-6529, ¶ 17. In turn, we simply cannot say the trial court erred and clearly lost its way by finding Myers guilty of domestic violence.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Monford

    190 Ohio App. 3d 35 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2010

    See also State v. Brown (Aug. 17, 1994), 1st Dist. No. C-930217, 1994 WL 442119 ; State v. Dunham (May 25, 1983), 1st Dist. No. C-820391, 1983 WL 8858 ; Reese v. … Brown, 10th Dist. No. 02AP-11, 2002-Ohio-5345 , 2002 WL 31194302 , ¶ 10, quoting State v. Long (Feb. 6, 1997), 10th Dist.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • In re D.S.S.

    2020 Ohio 5386 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 2020

    State v. Frazier, 4th Dist. Meigs No. 16CA15, 2017-Ohio-7221, ¶15, quoting Brown v. Executive 200, Inc., 64 Ohio St.2d 250, 252 (1980), quoting State v. Kilbane, 61 Ohio St.2d 201 (1980). … Brown, supra. Moreover, “in cases of criminal, indirect contempt, it must be shown that the alleged contemnor intended to defy the court.” Midland Steel Prods. Co. v. U.A.W.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.