Case law

State v. Copeland

2012 Ohio 4665 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2012

See State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Nos. C-100309 and C-100310, 2011-Ohio-1029, ¶ 9-10; see also State v. Hall, 1st Dist. No. C- 100097, 2011-Ohio-2527, ¶ 9-11; State v. Jones, 1st Dist. Nos. … See Brown at ¶ 12; Hall at ¶ 12; Jones at ¶ 14.

Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. v. City of Hamilton

117 N.E.3d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2018

of Township Trustees of Fairfield Township ("the Board"). … DiFranco v.

B. Ravens v. S.-i.E.E.B., Unpublished Decision (8-15-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2000

As discussed in our opinion in Hillside Dairy Company v. Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation Board (Aug. 3, 2000) Franklin App. … Russell v. Harrison Twp. (1991), 75 Ohio App.3d 643 , 648 ; Crowley v. Ohio Rehab. Serv. Comm. (1998), 126 Ohio App.3d 783 , 793-794 .

Cornett v. Iue Local 801

131 Ohio App. 3d 776 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1999

Workers v. Smith (1992), 76 Ohio App.Bd 652, 661, 602 N.E.2d 782, 787-788 . … Citing Wooddell v. Internatl. Bhd. of Elec.

Nagel v. Hogue, Ca2007-06-011 (6-23-2008)

2008 Ohio 3073 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2008

*Page 11 {¶ 53} In Pater v. … See Keller v. Keller , Jackson App.

Wilson v. Horton, Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004)

2004 Ohio 6841 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2004

Doan, P.J., and Gorman, J., concur. 1 Civ.R. 50(A)(4). 2 Goodyear Tire Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 512 , 514 , 769 N.E.2d 835 . 3 Roberts v. … Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc. (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242 , 272 N.E.2d 97 . 4 Id. at paragraph one of the syllabus. 5 Id. at 485. 6 Id. 7 See Liotta v. Rainey (Nov. 22, 2000), 8th Dist. No. 77396; McDermott v.

Greenberg v. Toledo Pub. Schools

210 N.E.3d 148 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 2023

CI0202003668 v. … Hampel v.

Poole v. Maloney

9 Ohio App. 3d 198 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 1983

Osborn, v. Jackson *199 (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41 [ 75 O.O.2d 132 ]; State, ex rel. Kendrick, v. Masheter (1964), 176 Ohio St. 232 [ 27 O.O.2d 128 ]. … Schomaeker v. First Natl. Bank (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 304, 312 [ 20 O.O.3d 285 ]. Ordinarily, an administrative officer is not a person whose interests are directly affected by an administrative decision. See Com v.

In re D.S.S.

2020 Ohio 5388 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 2020

Brown v. … State v. Frazier, 4th Dist. Meigs No. 16CA15, 2017-Ohio-7221, ¶15, quoting Brown, supra, at 252, quoting State v. Kilbane, 61 Ohio St.2d 201 (1980). This includes the right to due process. Id.; Segovia v.

Zavakos v. Zavakos Enterprises, Inc.

63 Ohio App. 3d 100 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 1989

Buckhorn, Inc. v. Ropak Corp. (D.Ohio 1987), 656 F.Supp. 209 . … Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219 , 5 OBR 481, 482, 450 N.E.2d 1140, 1142 ; State v. Jenkins (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 164 , 15 OBR 311, 473 N.E.2d 264 .

Nat. Amusements v. Union Township B.Z.A., Unpublished Decision (10-13-2003)

2003 Ohio 5434 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2003

Roper v. Richfield Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1962), 173 Ohio St. 168 , syllabus. {¶ 10} This holding was reaffirmed by the court in City of Willoughby Hills v. C.C. … Id. at 26 (emphasis added), citing Roper at syllabus; see, also, Alihassan v. Alliance Board of Zoning Appeals (Dec. 18, 2000), Stark App.

Sugarcreek Township v. City of Centerville

184 Ohio App. 3d 480 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2009

Smith v. … Shealy v.

Rooney Properties, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

2019 Ohio 4781 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2019

‘“A party seeking an increase or decrease in valuation bears the burden of proof before a board of revision.”’ Schwartz at ¶ 21, quoting Snavely v. Erie Cty. … Jakobovitch v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 152 Ohio St.3d 187, 2017-Ohio-8818, 94 N.E.3d 519, ¶ 12, citing Colonial Village v. Washington Cty.

Gardner v. Das

246 N.E.3d 693 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2024

LEXIS 4047 (Aug. 17, 1993) were jointly filed by the parties in a statutory proceeding before a state review board, but were mischaracterized as a settlement agreement in the board’s order. … This court found that the board properly proceeded on the stipulations and the language “ ‘pursuant to the terms of the agreement as filed with the board,’ does not procedurally detract from the action being upon stipulations

Kerg v. Atlantic Tool & Die Co.

176 Ohio App. 3d 437 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 2008

. {¶ 57} The majority relies on Page v. … Burgos, however, testified that the safety boards were never used to retrieve parts, and no one had ever told him to use the safety boards. Moreover, his trainer did not always use safety boards.

Bellecourt v. City of Cleveland

152 Ohio App. 3d 687 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 2003

Bd. of Commrs. v. Brown (1997), 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 . … Brown, 520 U.S. at 409 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 .

State v. Stover

2016 Ohio 1361 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2016

The two officers opened the lottery ticket and observed two tan/brown rocks. … State v.

Ass'n v. Welker

35 Ohio Law. Abs. 566 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1941

She testifies that such matters came before the board of directors at a regular meeting and that in the particular case “I imagine it would have been submitted to the board”. … Shannon v Universal Mortgage & Discount Co., 116 Oh St 609. See Andrews v Campbell, 36 Oh St 361.

Cox v. Oliver

2016 Ohio 4575 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2016

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education. 6. … Broadnax v.

Sherlock v. Shelly Company, 06ap-1303 (9-4-2007)

2007 Ohio 4522 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2007

Koos v. Cent. Ohio Cellular, Inc. (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 579 , 588 , citing Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 711 . … BROWN and McGRATH, JJ., concur. *Page 1