Case law

State v. Williams

2 Ohio App. Unrep. 655 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1990

The scenario present in Brown, where the charges filed against a defendant are presented in two separate indictments, was distinguished by the court from the factual setting of State v. … Although not addressed by the majority, appellant directs this court's attention to State v.

Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. Cincinnati

157 N.E.3d 941 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2020

Co. v. Cincinnati, 81 Ohio St.3d 599, 605, 693 N.E.2d 212 (1998), quoting Zielonka v. … See Hauser v.

Simmons v. Extendicare Health Servs., Inc.

2016 Ohio 4831 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 2016

See Scott, 2016-Ohio-495 at ¶ 18. {¶22} Extendicare cites to Brown v. Extendicare, Inc., 2015-Ohio-3059, 39 N.E.3d 896 (2nd Dist.) as support for its claim that Mrs. … In Scott, the appellant rehabilitation facility relied upon Brown to argue the daughter had apparent authority to enter into an arbitration agreement.

Edje v. Holmes

2024 Ohio 1663 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 2024

See Roetting v. Roetting, 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2014-06-128, 2015-Ohio-2461, ¶ 21; see also Brown v. Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. … In support, Holmes cites “Brown v.

Jacobs v. Marion Civil Service Comm.

27 Ohio App. 3d 194 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1985

On December 13, 1982, the Marion *195 City Board of Education terminated Jacobs’ employment. … In Armstrong v. Marion Civil Service Comm. (Apr. 1, 1981), Marion App.

Local 67, Intl. Assoc. v. City, Columbus, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2000

Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Mahoning Cty. TMR Edn. Assn. (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 80 , 84 , quoting Campbell v. Automatic Die Products Co. (1954), 162 Ohio St. 321 , 329 . … BROWN, J., concurs. TYACK, J., dissents.

Mellion v. Akron City School Dist., Unpublished Decision (1-24-2007)

2007 Ohio 242 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 2007

Lorence v. Goeller , 9th Dist. No. 04CA008556, 2005-Ohio-2678 , at ¶ 47 , citing Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Owca (Nov. 17, 1999), 9th Dist. No. 2897-M. … Bush v. Spurlock (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 77 , 80 .

Cleveland v. Washington

2013 Ohio 367 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2013

Hartt v. … State v.

Rushworth v. Hinckley Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2021 Ohio 2230 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2021

State v. Consilio, 9th Dist. … In Chapman v. Hous. Appeals Bd. we stated: The period of time within which an appeal from an administrative board must be perfected is thirty days after the entry of the final order.

Jenkins v. Public Employees Retirement System

87 Ohio Law. Abs. 42 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1961

McLean, v. Retirement Board, etc., 16 Ohio St., 327 ; State, ex rel. Pincombe, v. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement System et al., 172 Ohio St., 217 , for analogous reasoning in part. … The board shall formulate and adopt the necessary rules and regulations governing all designations of beneficiaries.”

Homeless Charity v. Akron

2019 Ohio 5330 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2019

[Cite as Homeless Charity v. Akron, 2019-Ohio-5330.] … State v. Consilio, 9th Dist.

C C Realty v. North Olmsted Bd., 88162 (5-10-2007)

2007 Ohio 2224 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 10, 2007

The minutes were not approved by the board until October 6, 2005. At that same time the "Board's Findings and Order" were also reviewed and adopted. … Martin v. Cleveland (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 155 , 157 ; Harlemert v. City of Oakwood (June 27, 2003), 2 nd Dist. No. 17983. 17 Singh v. Holfinger (Jan. 29, 1991), 10 th Dist. No. 90AP-639. 18 Swafford v.

Carter v. Akron Hous. Appeals Bd., Unpublished Decision (2-1-2006)

2006 Ohio 392 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2006

Pons v. Ohio State Med. … The Ohio Supreme Court has held that it is within a board's discretion whether or not to grant a continuance. Coats v. Limbach (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 114 , 116 .

State ex rel. Bellville v. Washington Twp.

2025 Ohio 410 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2025

Black v. … Grendell v.

Swartzbaugh v. Bethel Twp. B.O. Trustees, Unpublished Decision (11-14-2003)

2003 Ohio 6081 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2003

Swartzbaugh contends that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee Bethel Township Board of Trustees (the Board), because he demonstrated the existence of a genuine issue of material fact with … regard to whether the Board is entitled to judgment.

MacKnight v. Lake County Department of Human Services

107 Ohio App. 3d 181 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1995

Assn. v. Cuyahoga Falls City School Dish Bd. of Edn. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 193 , 574 N.E.2d 442 . … Appellant argues that the instant case is more directly on point with Bashford v. Portsmouth (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 195 , 556 N.E.2d 477 .

Poole v. Maloney

9 Ohio App. 3d 198 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 1983

Osborn, v. Jackson *199 (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41 [ 75 O.O.2d 132 ]; State, ex rel. Kendrick, v. Masheter (1964), 176 Ohio St. 232 [ 27 O.O.2d 128 ]. … Schomaeker v. First Natl. Bank (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 304, 312 [ 20 O.O.3d 285 ]. Ordinarily, an administrative officer is not a person whose interests are directly affected by an administrative decision. See Com v.

State v. Sparks

66 Ohio App. 3d 348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1990

I concur in the majority judgment and opinion on the basis of the recent decision in State v. Smith (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 60 , 537 N.E.2d 198 . … However, I believe the more persuasive reasoning in the Smith decision to be that of Justice Brown in his dissenting opinion, which sets forth and adopts the reasoning of the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County.

Schuerman v. Eastwood Local School Dist.

2016 Ohio 846 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2016

WD-15-044 Appellants Trial Court No. 2015CV0234 v. Board of Education, Eastwood Local School District, et al. … Ohio Pyro, Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Central Ohio Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union

33 Ohio App. 3d 168 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1987

Fenske, v. … Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11 , 52 O.O. 2d 32, 260 N.E. 2d 835 ; State, ex rel. Stefanick, v. Municipal Court (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 102 , 50 O. O. 2d 265, 255 N.E. 2d 634 .