Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.86s

  • State ex rel Brown v. Indus. Comm.

    2014 Ohio 3044 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2014

    [Cite as State ex rel Brown v. Indus. Comm., 2014-Ohio-3044.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. … Brown, : Relator, : v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Juergens

    2 Ohio Law. Abs. 58 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1923

    Epitomized Opinion Defendants were employed as clerks of the Board of Education of West Park at salaries of $600 and $1,000 a year respectively. … By State v. Fronzier, 77 OS. 7 , money paid on an unauthorized contract cannot be recovered back without putting the defendant in statu quo unless the statute' plainly authorizes it.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Industrial Commission

    28 Ohio Law. Abs. 513 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1939

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Otto C. Epp Memorial Hospital

    41 Ohio App. 3d 198 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1987

    Plaintiff-appellant Charlene Brown obtained a favorable verdict on her claim that she was wrongfully terminated from employment by defendant-appellee Otto C. … Brown v. Otto C. Epp Memorial Hosp. (1984), 19 Ohio App. 3d 25 , 19 OBR 90, 482 N.E. 2d *199 988. The case was then tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $20,500.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Nieman v. Board of Education

    22 Ohio App. 457 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1925

    The board of education of the ElmoreHarris school district of Ottawa county, Ohio, brought an action in the probate court against Henry W. … The board of education thereupon filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and the same was overruled.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Angerman v. State Medical Board

    70 Ohio App. 3d 346 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1990

    Delph, v. Barr (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 77 , 541 N.E.2d 59 , does not require a different result. … See Henry’s Cafe, Inc. v. Bd. of Liquor Control (1959), 170 Ohio St. 233 , 10 O.O.2d 177 , 163 N.E.2d 678 ; and Pioneer Chevrolet-Cadillac, Inc. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hilton v. Board of Education

    51 Ohio App. 336 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1935

    Included in this power is the power of the legislature to provide as a limitation on the power conferred on a board' of education that the rate of wages to be fixed by the board shall not be less than the prevailing scale … The fourth contention of the plaintiff relates to the claimed failure of the board to comply with the provisions of §17-4, GC, requiring “Rate of v/ages so fixed shall be printed on the bidding blanks.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Industrial Commission

    3 Ohio App. 3d 273 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1981

    The Regional Board of Review, upon appeal, found that relator was temporarily and totally disabled. … Whiteside and BROWN, JJ., concur. Brown, J., retired, of the Court of Common Pleas of Coshocton County, was assigned to active duty under authority of Section 6(C), Article IV, Constitution.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Twinsburg City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations Board

    172 Ohio App. 3d 535 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2007

    State Employment Relations Board (“SERB”). … Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (Aug. 15, 1991), 2d Dist. No. 12517, 1991 WL 355161 , at *4. {¶ 15} SERB has adopted the National Labor Relations Board’s definition of “ultimate impasse” in its proceedings.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sprague v. Board of Review

    70 Ohio Law. Abs. 387 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1953

    In the case of Henderson v. Wertheimer, 12 Oh. … French v. Millard, 2 Oh St, 45; Quock Ting v. United States, 140 U. S., 417 ; Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co., 172 U. S. 401, 408 ; In re Baumhauer, 179 Fed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Hollingsworth

    56 Ohio App. 95 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1936

    The deed contains the following recitals: —“do hereby grant, bargain, sell and. convey to the said Board of Education and to its successors and assigns forever the following described lands” (then follows a description of … Church, 120 Oh St, 309; Schwing v McClure et, Trustees, 120 Oh St, 335; Licking County Agricultural Society v County Commissioners, 48 Oh Ap 528, ( 17 Abs 235 ); Schurch et v Harriman et, 47 Oh Ap, 383, (15 *82 Abs 581).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Brown Cnty. Coroner

    95 N.E.3d 568 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2017

    [Cite as Curtis v. Brown Cty. Coroner, 2017-Ohio-7018.] … Blair v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perry Township Board of Trustees v. Franklin County Board of Zoning Appeals

    10 Ohio App. 3d 103 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1983

    See Corn v. Board of Liquor Control (1953), 160 Ohio St. 9 [ 50 O.O. 479 ]. … In its decision reversing the board of zoning appeals, and finding that the board of trustees was a proper party, the court of common pleas relied upon the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roper v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Leach v. Board of Review

    3 Ohio App. 2d 314 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1963

    Claimant, Parker,' and the administrator appealed the decision of the Board of Review to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. 6. April 24, 1963. … Appellant further questions the propriety of the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas holding the decision of the referee and the Board of Review as “unlawful.” Appellant relies on Vest v.

    Disapproved on other grounds by Pennington v. Dudley, 10 Ohio St. 2d 90 (1967)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harrigan v. Board of Commissioners

    13 Ohio App. 408 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1919

    Code, that would not have prevented the accident, because of the excessive speed of the automobile; third, that as the State Highway Department has control and the duty to r.epair and .maintain the road the defendant, the board … Section 7563, General Code, in part reads as follows: “The board of county commissioners shall erect or cause to be erected and maintained where hot already done, one or more guard rails on each end of a county bridge, viaduct

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hobbs v. Board of Review

    68 Ohio Law. Abs. 369 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1953

    Does the burden of proof as established in the case of Shannon v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, 155 Oh St 53, apply to the facts as set .forth in the instant case?” … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ohio Dept. of Agriculture v. Brown

    2020 Ohio 3316 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2020

    [Cite as Ohio Dept. of Agriculture v. Brown, 2020-Ohio-3316.] … See Evans v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Medical Board v. Quilter

    20 Ohio Law. Abs. 329 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1935

    by the Supreme Court of Ohio in the case of Rutledge v State Medical Board, 108 Oh St, p. 544. … And in the case of Nesmith v State Medical Beard of Ohio, 107 Oh St at p. 627, the Supreme Court upon the authority of the Rutledge case, supraj for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, ordered that the case be

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kunkel v. Board of Commissioners

    177 Ohio App. 3d 718 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2008

    Bd. of Trustees v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Cty. … for in the statute.’ ” Smith v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Poffenberger v. Board of Revision

    54 Ohio App. 2d 89 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1977

    Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 161 , and cases cited therein. In Griffith v. Clermont County Bd. of Revision, unreported, First Appellate District, No. CA 546, decided April 14, 1975, and Sidio v. … Board of Revision (1966), 5 Ohio St. 2d 214 , governed. We consider that principle applicable to the facts before us.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.