Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

2.49s

  • Youngstown Steel Door Co. v. Kosydar

    33 Ohio App. 2d 277 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1973

    This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. … Oxford English Dictionary, v. 7, pt. 1, 7, and v. 1, pt. 1, 157.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • City Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Pluchel

    37 Ohio App. 423 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 1931

    These bonds, in the several instances, were shown to have been taken from the boxes . by one Browning, formerly cashier of the bank, and then deceased. … The facts in these cases were somewhat different, be- . cause jn many, instances Browning was permitted to have the customer’s key, alsb.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Accorinti

    2013 Ohio 4429 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 2013

    State v. Brown, 186 Ohio App.3d 437, 2010-Ohio-324, ¶ 7 (12th Dist.). … State v. Luong, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2011-06-110, 2012-Ohio-4520, ¶ 39.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Mulligan v. Campden Lakes Assn. Inc.

    2012 Ohio 3121 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2012

    Temple v. … Children's Medical Center v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Carter

    2025 Ohio 1217 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2025

    State v. Miranda, 2012-Ohio-3971, ¶ 17 (10th Dist.). See State v. Brown, 2022-Ohio-4689, ¶ 18 (3d Dist.) (In general, “the Ohio Rules of Evidence do not strictly apply to sentencing proceedings.”). … State v. Brown, 2015-Ohio-365, ¶ 18 (12th Dist.), quoting State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Clements v. Babb

    81 Ohio App. 277 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1947

    officials and boards may properly be joined as parties to the proceeding.” *640 Likewise, in State, ex rel. v Board of Elections, 3 Oh Ap 190, the Court held that where a board of elections refused to act by reason of a direction … Clements v Karl R. Babb, etc., et al., No. 4011, in this Court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Salida Invest. Group v. Lake Cty. Util. Dept.

    2015 Ohio 5066 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2015

    Group v. Lake Cty. Util. Dept., 2015-Ohio-5066.] … One month later, the board upheld the additional tap-in/capacity fees. {¶6} Appellant appealed the board’s ruling to the common pleas court.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. v. Delphi Automotive Sys., Inc.

    2017 Ohio 809 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2017

    No. 13CV-13451) v. … McConnell v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Servs., 10th Dist. No. 95APE03-262 (Oct. 5, 1995), citing Loctite Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gonzalez v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    68 Ohio App. 2d 243 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 27, 1980

    Gonzalez appealed to the State Personnel Board of Review contending that the transfer violated R. … Brennan (D.C.D.C. 1974), 8 Employment Practices Decisions, paragraph No. 9634 (which implements the decision issued in NAACP v. Brennan [D.C.D.C. 1973], 360 F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • George v. Wm. C. Johnson Candy Co.

    18 Ohio App. 114 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 1923

    (See George v. Wm. C. Johnson Candy Co., 16 Ohio App., 487 .) … The defense to both causes of action was that said articles were a part of gaming or gambling devices known as “punch board assortments,” the sale and use of which is prohibited by and contrary to the laws of Ohio, and against

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McBride v. Butler

    2018 Ohio 1251 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2018

    Brown v. Cty. … Parker v. Patrick, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2011-12-027, 2012-Ohio-3312, ¶ 15.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Paolucci

    110 N.E.3d 548 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2018

    State v. Leak, 145 Ohio St.3d 165, 2016-Ohio-154, 47 N.E.3d 821, ¶ 12; State v. Orosz, 11th Dist. … In State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. White, 21795 (10-19-2007)

    2007 Ohio 5671 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 2007

    State v. Brown (1994), 97 Ohio App.3d 293 , 301 , 646 N.E.2d 838 . As previously noted, the evidence indicates that after Thomas entered the apartment on June 15, he was told to leave. … State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Walkup v. Walkup

    31 Ohio App. 3d 248 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1986

    See Lynn v. State (1934), 47 Ohio App. 158 , 191 N.E. 100 . … Sanzenbacher v. Sanzenbacher (1981), 3 Ohio App. 3d 180 , 3 OBR 206, 444 N.E. 2d 454 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Esselburne v. Ohio Department of Agriculture

    29 Ohio App. 3d 152 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 7, 1985

    Myers, v. … Townsend, v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Sanford v. 202 Racing, Inc.

    2011 Ohio 3987 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 2011

    Brown Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. Lakeside Place, Suite 200 323 W. Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44113 KENNETH A. … (which means ‘free on board’) at a name place is a delivery term.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Holsinger

    2014 Ohio 2523 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2014

    See State v. … ."); State v. Davis, 7th Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Dunifon, Dir.

    88 Ohio App. 246 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1950

    The Common Pleas Court, under Section 154-73, General Code, was empowered to review the action of the board but not to substitute its judgment for that of the board. Farrand v. … See Mocilnikar v. Board of Liquor Control, 84 Ohio App., 266 , 85 N. E. (2d), 408.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Stewart

    2013 Ohio 753 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 2013

    death of Clinton Brown … Clinton Brown.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gallo Displays, Inc. v. Cleveland Public Power

    84 Ohio App. 3d 688 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1992

    John V. Corrigan, Judge. … The PUCO is an administrative board which derives its authority solely from statutes. New Bremen v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1921), 103 Ohio St. 23 , 132 N.E. 162 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.