Case law

Weaver v. O.D.J.F.S.

153 Ohio App. 3d 331 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 2003

Haghighi v. Moody , 152 Ohio App.3d 600 , 2003-Ohio-2203 , 789 N.E.2d 673 ; Theodus v. Theodus (Feb. 13, 1997), 8th Dist. No. 70805. … Univ. of Cincinnati v.

Swartz v. Van Deest

2023 Ohio 1882 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2023

Blakemore v. … Kreuzer v.

Citizens Organized Against Longwalling v. Division of Reclamation

41 Ohio App. 3d 290 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1987

In Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. … In Skivolocki v.

Conti v. Shriner

30 Ohio Law. Abs. 193 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1939

V. … Lewis v Reed, 117 Oh St 152; State ex Tailford v Bristline, 96 Oh St 581.

State v. King

2018 Ohio 3232 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 2018

See, State v. … State v. Brown, 98 Ohio St.3d 121, 781 N.E.2d 159, 2002-Ohio-7040, syllabus. Appellant subsequently executed a waiver time on April 6, 2017, and revoked the same on June 13, 2017.

Mutual Home Sav. Assn. v. Merion, Supt.

67 Ohio App. 439 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2, 1941

See the case of State v Ferranto, 112 Oh St 667. State v Wright, 59 Oh Ap 191, by this Court. Hoffman v Knollman, 135 Oh St 170. … Board of Commissioners v Lewis, 65 P. 51 , 28 Colo. 378 ; Taylor v Robertson, 52 P. 1 Utah, 330.

State ex rel. Mansfield Motorsports Speedway, L.L.C. v. Dropsey

2012 Ohio 968 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2012

In Dworning v. … Harris v. Rhodes (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 41, 42, citing State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 81.

Koch v. Rhodes

3 Ohio App. 2d 236 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1963

The recodification law was effective October 1, 1953, and the law increasing administrative salaries of various departments including the Board of Liquor Control became effective October 2, 1953. … Leis, Member of Board of Liquor Control, v. Ferguson, Aud., 149 Ohio St. 555 .

SandiCare, L.L.C. v. Wilson

97 N.E.3d 752 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2017

[Cite as SandiCare, L.L.C. v. Wilson, 2017-Ohio-7596.] … Harper’s adult daughter, A.H., qualified for benefits from the Summit Developmental Disabilities Board (“the Board”).

Maddox, Exr. v. Reser

110 Ohio App. 213 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1959

Brown). They also allege that defendants have failed to account to them for rents and profits. The prayer is for possession and accounting. … Maynard’s Lessee v. Cable, Wright, 18, the first paragraph of the syllabus. And see Hornback v. Cincinnati and Zanesville R. R. Co., 20 Ohio St., 81 .

State v. Gott

4 Ohio App. Unrep. 90 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1990

See, State v. Broom (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 277, 288-89 ; State v. Wickline (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 114, 119 . … State v. Jones (July 14, 1980), Athens App. No. 1025 (unreported). See also, State v. Cross (1975), 48 Ohio App. 2d 357, 360 ; State v. Goble (1982), 5 Ohio App. 3d 197, 198 .

State v. South

11 Ohio App. 2d 187 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1967

Our predecessors in this court wrestled with a similar problem (involving a quarantine regulation) in State v. Oliver (1951), 65 Ohio Law Abs. 606 . … The remaining 70.6 cents must therefore be considered a fee or assessment or tax which neither the county nor city Boards of Health nor the Humane Society has any authority to impose. Stubbs v.

Chicone v. Liquor Control Comm.

20 Ohio App. 2d 43 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1969

Dana, v. Gerber, 79 Ohio App. 1 ; Roark v. Lyle, 68 Ohio Law Abs. 180 ; State, ex rel. Long, v. Brinkman, 7 C. C. 165, 3 C. D. 710.) This power may be exercised if the statute is so incomplete (Beaverstock v. … (Beaverstock v. Bd. of Ed., supra, and State, ex rel. Dana, v. Gerber, supra.)

State ex rel. Mango v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2019 Ohio 4774 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2019

Alford v. … Further, the bodycam video was submitted for the parole board to review. As such, in finding that relator violated rule one, the parole board had more than just hearsay evidence before it.

Zalvin v. Ayers

157 N.E.3d 256 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 2020

The actions of a minority (less than ten percent) holder with no representative on the board simply do not require the disclosures that the Plaintiffs argue would have been material. * * * [T]he Board … Grippi v. Cantagallo, 11th Dist.

George v. Wm. C. Johnson Candy Co.

18 Ohio App. 114 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 1923

(See George v. Wm. C. Johnson Candy Co., 16 Ohio App., 487 .) … The defense to both causes of action was that said articles were a part of gaming or gambling devices known as “punch board assortments,” the sale and use of which is prohibited by and contrary to the laws of Ohio, and against

Jones v. Schneider

3 Ohio App. 2d 325 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1964

Co. v. Kearns, Recorder, 71 Ohio App. 209, 218-219 . … Jones and Brown, JJ., concur. Brown, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the Seventh Appellate District.

Akron v. J.B.

2019 Ohio 2203 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2019

See Akron v. Pari, 9th Dist. Summit Nos. 29029, 29030, 2019-Ohio-1083; Akron v. Brown, 9th Dist. Summit No. 28629, 2018-Ohio-4500. … and Brown.

State v. Moore

2015 Ohio 3435 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2015

Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197 (1980). … See State v. Ball, 5th Dist. Licking No. 13-CA-17, 2013- Ohio-3443; State v. Clark, 2nd Dist. Clark No. 2012-CA-16, 2013-Ohio-299; State v. Milem, 2nd Dist.

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Motley Rice, L.L.C.

2013 Ohio 3737 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2013

Schuler Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co. 65 East State Street Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Michael J. … Blakemore v.