Case law

Hillman v. Larrison

2018 Ohio 184 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 2018

Brown v. Jeffries, 4th Dist. No. 11CA3275, 2012-Ohio-1522, ¶ 9. … Boylen v. Harmon, 107 Ohio St.3d 370, 2006-Ohio-7, ¶ 6.

Loura v. Adler

105 Ohio App. 3d 634 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1995

Citing this court’s decision in Kurzner v. … See Wells v.

Swartz v. Van Deest

2023 Ohio 1882 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2023

Blakemore v. … Kreuzer v.

English v. Ward

13 Ohio Law. Abs. 397 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1932

Such board shall canvass such returns at a meeting to be held on the second Monday after the election, and the result thereof shall be entered upon the records of the board.” … So far as indicated by the allegations of the second defense, there is simply the declaration that the proposition to issue bonds did not receive a majority vote and nothing to indicate that the vote v?

SandiCare, L.L.C. v. Wilson

97 N.E.3d 752 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2017

[Cite as SandiCare, L.L.C. v. Wilson, 2017-Ohio-7596.] … Harper’s adult daughter, A.H., qualified for benefits from the Summit Developmental Disabilities Board (“the Board”).

Jacobs v. Clearing Machine Corp.

65 Ohio Law. Abs. 269 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1952

Section 10 (a) of the act provides: ‘The Board is empowered, as hereinafter provided,.to prevent any person from engaging in any unfair practice (listed in Section [a]) affecting commerce. … Plaintiffs cite the case of Jennings v. Jennings, 56 Abs 258 , and Huntsman v. McGovern, 56 Abs 170 , in support of their position.

Castner v. Jefferson Cty.

2025 Ohio 1309 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2025

Doe v. … Id.; State v. Brown, 2015-Ohio-486, ¶ 10. {¶36} In construing an ambiguous statute, a court must ascertain the intent of the legislature.

State v. Dawley

2016 Ohio 2904 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 9, 2016

State v. Holbert, 38 Ohio St.2d 113, 311 N.E.2d 22(1974), paragraph two of the syllabus. In State v. … .” {¶17} The case at bar is distinguishable from Brown. This was not a simple case of a minor misdemeanor traffic violation as was the case in Brown.

Kline v. OID Associates, Inc.

80 Ohio App. 3d 393 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 6, 1992

Brown v. Day (1990), 68 Ohio App.3d 447, 449 , 588 N.E.2d 973, 974 , citing Hanson v. Kynast (1986), 24 Ohio St.3d 171, 179 , 24 OBR 403, 410, 494 N.E.2d 1091, 1098 (Holmes, J., concurring). … Brown, supra; Nganga v. College of Wooster (1989), 52 Ohio App.3d 70 , 557 N.E.2d 152 .

Citizens Organized Against Longwalling v. Division of Reclamation

41 Ohio App. 3d 290 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1987

In Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. … In Skivolocki v.

State ex rel. Mango v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2019 Ohio 4774 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2019

Alford v. … Further, the bodycam video was submitted for the parole board to review. As such, in finding that relator violated rule one, the parole board had more than just hearsay evidence before it.

Clouse v. Coykendall

30 Ohio C.C. Dec. 550 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 1918

This tribunal is the board of township trustees, who become by virtue of that office the board of health for so much of the township as lies outside of any municipality. … Ry. v. Lockwood, 72 Ohio St. 586 [ 74 N. E. 1071 ].

Daddario v. Rose

2024 Ohio 5883 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 2024

McHenry v. McHenry, 2017-Ohio-1534, ¶ 72 (5th Dist.), citing Kemp v. Kemp, 2005-Ohio-3120, ¶ 73 (5th Dist.); Greig v. … McHenry v.

Zaremba Development Co. v. City of Fairview Park

84 Ohio App. 3d 174 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1992

(“Zaremba”) challenge the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of the city of Fairview Park’s Board of Zoning and Building Appeals (“the board”), which denied their request for variance. We reverse. … See State ex rel Ice & Fuel Co. v. Kreuzweiser (1929), 120 Ohio St. 352, 354 , 166 N.E. 228, 229 . See, also, State ex rel. Fairmount Ctr. Co. v. Arnold (1941), 138 Ohio St. 259 , 20 O.O. 330 , 34 N.E.2d 777 .

Jones v. Schneider

3 Ohio App. 2d 325 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1964

Co. v. Kearns, Recorder, 71 Ohio App. 209, 218-219 . … Jones and Brown, JJ., concur. Brown, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the Seventh Appellate District.

Conti v. Shriner

30 Ohio Law. Abs. 193 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1939

V. … Lewis v Reed, 117 Oh St 152; State ex Tailford v Bristline, 96 Oh St 581.

Mutual Home Sav. Assn. v. Merion, Supt.

67 Ohio App. 439 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2, 1941

See the case of State v Ferranto, 112 Oh St 667. State v Wright, 59 Oh Ap 191, by this Court. Hoffman v Knollman, 135 Oh St 170. … Board of Commissioners v Lewis, 65 P. 51 , 28 Colo. 378 ; Taylor v Robertson, 52 P. 1 Utah, 330.

State ex rel. Mansfield Motorsports Speedway, L.L.C. v. Dropsey

2012 Ohio 968 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2012

In Dworning v. … Harris v. Rhodes (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 41, 42, citing State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 81.

Koch v. Rhodes

3 Ohio App. 2d 236 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1963

The recodification law was effective October 1, 1953, and the law increasing administrative salaries of various departments including the Board of Liquor Control became effective October 2, 1953. … Leis, Member of Board of Liquor Control, v. Ferguson, Aud., 149 Ohio St. 555 .

Maddox, Exr. v. Reser

110 Ohio App. 213 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1959

Brown). They also allege that defendants have failed to account to them for rents and profits. The prayer is for possession and accounting. … Maynard’s Lessee v. Cable, Wright, 18, the first paragraph of the syllabus. And see Hornback v. Cincinnati and Zanesville R. R. Co., 20 Ohio St., 81 .