Case law

State Ex Rel. Felson v. McHenry

146 Ohio App. 3d 542 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2001

Evans v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 236, 238 , 594 N.E.2d 609, fn. 2 . 5 . State ex rel. Bush v. Spurlock (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 77, 80 , 537 N.E.2d 641 ; State ex rel. Alford v. … Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 190 , 532 N.E.2d 753 . 7 . O’Brien v. Univ. Community Tenants Union, Inc. (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 242, 245 , 71 O.O.2d 223 , 327 N.E.2d 753 . 8 . Hunt v.

State v. Moore

2015 Ohio 3435 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2015

Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197 (1980). … See State v. Ball, 5th Dist. Licking No. 13-CA-17, 2013- Ohio-3443; State v. Clark, 2nd Dist. Clark No. 2012-CA-16, 2013-Ohio-299; State v. Milem, 2nd Dist.

Burton v. City of Middletown

4 Ohio App. 3d 114 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1982

the final authority to approve or disapprove the report rendered by the board, the board itself could commit no error. … Such a practice has been condemned in Tolson v.

State v. Tucker, 88231 (4-12-2007)

2007 Ohio 1710 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2007

The victim initially told police that one of the suspects was wearing a Browns' jersey. A Browns' jersey was located on the back seat next to appellant when the vehicle was stopped. … State v.

Spitzer v. Knapp

2019 Ohio 2701 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 2019

Browning-Ferris Inds. of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321, 474 N.E.2d 271 (1984). A fact is material if it affects the outcome of the case under the applicable substantive law. Russell v. … Vail v.

Blue Stone v. Township Board of Appeals, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1998

Tuber v. Perkins (1966), 6 Ohio St.2d 155 , 157 . … See Gerzeny v. Richfield Twp. (1980), 62 Ohio St.2d 339 .

Malia v. Wright, Treas.

80 Ohio App. 415 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1947

There was an abuse of discretion by the board, and the following of an arbitrary rule, not provided by statute. In the case of Urban v. … From the consideration of these facts, we cannot say that the board abused its discretion or that it failed to make an investigation when the lands were ordered forfeited. See, Cech v. Schultz, 132 Ohio St., 353 , 7 N.

State v. Haynie

157 Ohio App. 3d 708 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 2004

State v. Johnson, 11th Dist. … State v. Peacock, 11th Dist.

City of Springfield v. Tracy

105 Ohio App. 3d 187 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1995

Cleveland v. Perk (1972), 29 Ohio St.2d 161 , 58 O.O.2d 354 , 280 N.E.2d 653 ; Dayton v. … . *190 The city of Springfield cites and relies on the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in Darke Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v.

State ex rel. Rea v. Bd. of Education

34 Ohio Law. Abs. 274 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 1941

That notwithstanding the failure of the defendant Board of Education to submit said question of centralization to an election Dy the people, the defendant, Board of Education intends to centralize the schools of said district … The case was not reported in the lower courts, but was entitled Bowers et al v the Board of Education of Fulton Township, and appears to have been affirmed by the Supreme Court without report in 78 Oh St 443.

State Ex Rel. Froehlich & Emery Engineering Co. v. Evans

30 Ohio App. 419 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1927

Co. v. Village of Wadsworth, 109 Ohio St., 440 , 142 N. E., 900 , 33 A. L. R., 711. … Pebbles et al., Trustees, v. Griffin, Treas., 4 C. C., 156, 2 C. D., 474, affirmed by the Supreme Court of Ohio, without opinion, Griffin v. State, ex rel. Pebbles, 21 W. L.

In re Henry Cty. Regional Water & Sewer Dist.

2020 Ohio 4341 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2020

See, e.g., Glouster v. Trimble Twp. … “[A] petition of remonstrance when duly filed makes ineffectual the action of the board of trustees.” Myers v. Trustees of Southwest Regional Water Dist., 12th Dist. Butler No.

Weibel v. Poda

116 Ohio App. 38 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1962

Nimberger, v. Bushnell et al., Bd. of Edn., 95 Ohio St., 203 . … See: Columbus Building & Construction Trades Council v. Moyer, Dir., 163 Ohio St., 189 ; Southern Surety Co. v. Standard Slag Co., 117 Ohio St., 512 ; Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc., v.

Perkins v. Stockert

45 Ohio App. 2d 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1975

Such section provides that the organizational board of commissioners shall appoint at least three, but not more than six, citizen members of the board of trustees to represent the interests of present and future residents … In Basell v.

Colarik v. Young

91 Ohio Law. Abs. 227 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1962

Brown, P. J. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff-appellant’s second amended petition. … the petition and the amended petition indicate clearly that the injury, upon which plaintiff’s claimed right of participation in the State Insurance Fund was founded, was not accidental in character, as defined in Dripps v.

Natale v. Everflow Eastern, Inc.

195 Ohio App. 3d 270 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2011

Alden v. Kovar, 11th Dist. Nos. 2007-T-0114 and 2007-T-0115, 2008-Ohio-4302 , 2008 WL 3892181 , ¶ 34, citing Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . … Brown, 87 Ohio App.3d at 712 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 .

The Beacon Journal v. Board of Elections, Unpublished Decision (4-8-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1998

Temple v. Wean United, Inc. (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 317 , 327 ; Delker v. Ohio Edison Co. (1989), 47 Ohio App.3d 1 , 2 . A. … Sidley, Inc. v. Limbach (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 256 , 257 .

Lowery v. Keystone B.O.E., Unpublished Decision (5-9-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals · May 9, 2001

Rider-Durst v. Conotton Valley Union Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

2021 Ohio 3587 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2021

Bonnell v. E. Liverpool City School Dist. Board of Edn., 7th Dist. Columbiana No. 05 CO 32, 2006-Ohio-3482. The Bonnell court stated that the appellant “also did raise a common law taxpayer action. … Connors v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 8 Ohio App.3d 44, 47, 455 N.E.2d 1331 (10th Dist.1982); State ex rel. Walgate v.

Lucas v. Gross Motor Car Co.

32 Ohio App. 183 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1927

It is not claimed that any bulletin boards were destroyed or out of repair, or that the bulletin boards were not painted as per contract. … See also' Williston on Contracts Section 413; American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co., 248 Fed. Rep. 172, 184, 185; and Wooster v. Crane & Co., 73 N. J. Eq., 32.”