Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

0.92s

  • Wright v. Utzinger

    36 Ohio Law. Abs. 217 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1942

    Counsel for appellant in their brief refer us to the case of Hudson v Meyers, 13 Abs 732 , wherein it was held that it was error to deny a motion by a defendant in an action on question to compel the plaintiff to itemize … for room and board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Jacquillard

    2013 Ohio 4778 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 2013

    [Cite as State v. Jacquillard, 2013-Ohio-4778.] … Brown, this court discussed what type of action by the trial court constituted sufficient notification to a defendant regarding postrelease control. State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton Nos.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Al-Khatib v. Harrison Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

    2022 Ohio 1418 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2022

    C.D.S., Inc. v. … City of Kettering v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sheridan v. Jackson Township Division of Fire, 08ap-771 (3-19-2009)

    2009 Ohio 1267 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2009

    See Brown v. BKW Drywall Supply, Inc. (S.D.Ohio 2004), 305 F.Supp.2d 814 , 825 . Even moderate difficulty in walking may not establish a substantial impairment. See Satterly v. Borden Chem., Inc. … BROWN and McGRATH, JJ., concur. *Page 1

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Coy v. Montgomery County Board of Health, Unpublished Decision (4-7-2000)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2000

    Coy cites Antonik v. Chamberlain (1947), 81 Ohio App. 465 , and Routsaw v. … The Ohio Hair Products Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wolf v. Rothstein

    2016 Ohio 5441 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2016

    V. … Whitlow v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Reveria Tavern, Inc. v. Summit Cty. Bd., Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004)

    2004 Ohio 6733 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2004

    Temple v. … Arnett v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Kelley v. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co.

    62 Ohio App. 397 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1939

    Armstrong v C. M. & L. Traction Co., 10 O. N. P. N. S. 581, and Schmalstig v Taft, 19 O. N. P. N. … The Painesville Utopia Theatre Co. v Lautermilch. 118 Oh St 167, and Pope v Mudge, 108 Oh St 192.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Hungarian Federation v. Nadas

    35 Ohio App. 3d 72 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1987

    Only the National President or Chairman of the Board of Directors at the request of one-third of the members of the board can call a special meeting. However, the calling of meetings is also regulated by statute. … East Cleveland Democratic Club, Inc., v. Bibb, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cleveland v. Mayfield

    2014 Ohio 3712 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2014

    Cleveland v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 97878, 2012-Ohio-4722, ¶ 9. … E.g., Brown at ¶ 15; E. Cleveland v. Zapo, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 96718, 2011-Ohio-6757; Parma v. Pratts, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 94990, 2011-Ohio-708; Parma v. Buckwald, 8th Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Natale v. Everflow Eastern, Inc.

    195 Ohio App. 3d 270 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2011

    Alden v. Kovar, 11th Dist. Nos. 2007-T-0114 and 2007-T-0115, 2008-Ohio-4302 , 2008 WL 3892181 , ¶ 34, citing Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . … Brown, 87 Ohio App.3d at 712 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ney v. Decourcy

    81 Ohio App. 3d 775 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1992

    Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Co. v. Cappellar (1883), 38 Ohio St. 560 ; Brooks v. Lander (1905), 14 Ohio C.C. (N.S.) 481 , affirmed sub nom. Brooks v. Spencer (1906), 74 Ohio St. 428 , 78 N.E. 1119 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Copenhefer v. Clark Cty. Bd. Elections, Unpublished Decision (10-31-2001)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2001

    Belmont County Board of Elections (1985), 19 Ohio St.3d 154 and Esch v. Lake County Board of Elections (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 595 . … See, also, Chevalier v. Brown (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 61 , 63 , 17 OBR 64, 66, 477 N.E.2d 623 , 625 ; State, ex rel Evergeen, Co., v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Perkins v. Stockert

    45 Ohio App. 2d 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1975

    Such section provides that the organizational board of commissioners shall appoint at least three, but not more than six, citizen members of the board of trustees to represent the interests of present and future residents … In Basell v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Friend v. Brankatelli

    19 Ohio App. 3d 64 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1984

    Sustin v. … DiMaggio v. Mystic Bldg.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schack v. Geneva Civil Service Commission

    86 Ohio App. 3d 689 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1993

    The trial court erred in finding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Rocky River v. State Employment Relations Board, 43 Ohio St. … In Nuspl v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Wagner

    2024 Ohio 5394 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2024

    Brown at ¶ 14, quoting Adams at ¶ 36. … Brown at ¶ 16-18.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Decree v. Columbus

    3 Ohio App. Unrep. 269 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 1990

    The appellant to the board of review pursuant to R.C. 4141.28. The board of review also disallowed appellant's appeal. … The related case, which is based on the same underlying facts, is Van Ness Decree v. City of Columbus (Aug. 17, 1989), Franklin App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STATE Ex CLAY v. MADIGAN Et.

    29 Ohio App. 117 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1927

    State ex rel v. Smith, Secretary of state, 101 OS. 358 . State ex rel Gongweir v. Graves, Secretary of State, 90 OS. 311 . … The Board was required to place upon the ballot, the candidates receiving the greatest number of votes not exceeding four.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Serrer v. Cigarette Service Co.

    48 Ohio Law. Abs. 484 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1947

    The question under consideration was considered in the case of Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board v Everglades Laundry Company, 188 So. 380 (Fla.) where the constitutionality of a Florida statute regulating the laundry … In 1933 the State of New York passed the “Milk Control Law” creating a Milk Control Board to fixe thé price of milk in New York, -the power of the Board to end on March 31, 1934.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.