Case law

Lupo v. Columbus

2014 Ohio 2792 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2014

Charvat v. Frye, 114 Ohio St.3d 76, 2007- Ohio-2882, ¶ 23; Flynn v. Flynn, 10th Dist. No. 03AP-612, 2004-Ohio-3881, ¶ 10. … and protests the changing of a zoned area from residential to commercial, and advises the board, on the record, that if the decision of the board is adverse to him he intends

Wolf v. Rothstein

2016 Ohio 5441 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2016

V. … Whitlow v.

Tycast v. Maple Heights Board of Education, Unpublished Decision (3-25-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1999

See Cash v. Cincinnati (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 319 . The appellant was following her grandchildren into the gymnasium while a basketball game was in progress. (Tycast Depo. at 11.)

Pequignot v. Adams Twp. Board of Trustees, Unpublished Decision (9-28-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1998

The county engineer or anyone acting under his authority, when authorized by the board of county commissioners or board of township trustees, may enter immediately: (A) Upon any lands adjacent to any of the highways in the … Fahnbulleh v.

State v. Robles

65 Ohio App. 3d 104 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1989

See State v. Chapin (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 437 , 21 O.O.3d 273 , 424 N.E.2d 317 ; State v. … State v. Cowans (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 96 , 39 O.O.2d 97 , 227 N.E.2d 201 ; State v.

Kelley v. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co.

62 Ohio App. 397 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1939

Armstrong v C. M. & L. Traction Co., 10 O. N. P. N. S. 581, and Schmalstig v Taft, 19 O. N. P. N. … The Painesville Utopia Theatre Co. v Lautermilch. 118 Oh St 167, and Pope v Mudge, 108 Oh St 192.

Russell v. Fourth National Bank

4 Ohio App. 378 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 28, 1915

granted 'to them by the courts in matters affecting the competency of testimony, and the paper has ' no greater or other probative effect than a statement of Farmer Smith, for example, to the effect that he owns Farmer Brown … said: “It has frequently been declared that the books can not in general be adduced by the corporation in support of its own claims, against a stranger, or to affect strangers in any way;” citing in support, Commonwealth v.

In Re Job Abolishment of Jenkins

120 Ohio App. 385 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1963

The essence of the board decision as communicated to Mr. … Whether this section gives the Board of Review authority to hear an appeal in a claimed job abolishment situation is not clear, although the case of State, ex rel. Click, v.

Voorhees v. Anderson Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2024 Ohio 4459 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2024

Zoning boards and courts must be careful to avoid zoning property “‘by implication.’” Id., quoting Henley v. Youngstown Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 90 Ohio St.3d 142, 152 (2000). … See City of Blue Ash v.

Jones, Admr. v. Neu

106 Ohio App. 161 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 29, 1958

Neu’s brother was a permanent board-paying resident at this address. The son, Lester O. Neu, who lived in his mother’s home all his life, never paid a stipulated price for his room and board. … Did you pay any board at your house, there? “A.

Sovran Self Service v. Board of Revision, Unpublished Decision (11-4-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1999

In Akron Standard Div. v. … Bank v. Wood Cty.

Gallick v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

2019 Ohio 485 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 2019

APPEALS from the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals LUPER SCHUSTER, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, John J. … See Morgan v.

Hubay v. Ohio Elections Comm.

2023 Ohio 4801 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2023

Bd. of Edn. v. State Board of Edn., 63 Ohio St.3d 705, 707 (1992). Rather, “this court’s role is limited to determining whether the court of common pleas abused its discretion.” Id., citing Roy v. State Med. … The board in that case lacked the requisite quorum to act because the “four regular members of the board and the sole alternate were recused from the case, leaving only [one board member] to hear and decide the application

State Ex Rel. Ney v. Decourcy

81 Ohio App. 3d 775 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1992

Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Co. v. Cappellar (1883), 38 Ohio St. 560 ; Brooks v. Lander (1905), 14 Ohio C.C. (N.S.) 481 , affirmed sub nom. Brooks v. Spencer (1906), 74 Ohio St. 428 , 78 N.E. 1119 .

Sapienza v. Material Eng. & Technical Support Servs. Corp.

2011 Ohio 3559 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2011

Myers v. Board of Edn. (1917), 95 Ohio St. 367, 116 N.E. 516), and one may be construed to have the meaning of the other (State v. Budd, supra; State ex rel. Myers v. Board of Edn., supra; Gallman v. … Methodist Children's Home v. Board of Edn. (1922), 105 Ohio St. 438, 138 N.E. 865). {¶47} “As Judge Stewart of this court said in Dennison v.

State v. Litteral

2022 Ohio 1187 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2022

State v. Howard, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2009-CA-2, 2010-Ohio-501, ¶ 32, citing Browning v. … See, also, Browning v. State (1929), 120 Ohio St. 62, 165 N.E.2d 566, paragraph three of the syllabus.

State v. Royster

3 Ohio App. 3d 442 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1982

See Harris v. Oklahoma (1977), 433 U.S. 682 and Brown v. Ohio (1977), 432 U.S. 161 . … (Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333 ; Whalen v. United States, 445 U.S. 684 ; Brown v. *445 Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , approved and followed.) “2.

Friend v. Brankatelli

19 Ohio App. 3d 64 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1984

Sustin v. … DiMaggio v. Mystic Bldg.

Eaton Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. KNG, Ltd.

214 N.E.3d 742 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 2023

Bd. of Trustees v. KNG, Ltd., 2023-Ohio-1621.] … Bd. of Trustees v. Wadsworth, 9th Dist.

Cobb v. Mantua Twp. Bd. of Trustees, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)

2004 Ohio 5325 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2004

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Darrell Cobb, appeals from a judgment of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, granting summary judgment to appellee, Mantua Township Board of Trustees. … Yeager v.