Case law

State v. Board of Commisioners, Warren Cty., Unpublished Decision (8-3-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1998

Williams v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 13 . … Karmasu v. Tate (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 199 . Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal, State ex rel. Casey v.

Board of Trust., Union v. Plan. Develop., Unpublished Decision (12-11-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2000

Troha v. Troha (1995), 105 Ohio App.3d 327 , 334 , citing Mumaw v. W. S. Life Ins. Co. (1917), 97 Ohio St. 1 , 9 . … In Illinois Controls v. Landham (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 517 , motion for reconsideration denied, 71 Ohio St. 1414 , Kebe v. Nutro Machinery Corp. (1985), 30 Ohio App.3d 175 , and Clark v.

Plain Township Board of Trustees v. Palmer, Unpublished Decision (3-17-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 2000

Marano v. Gibbs (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 310 , 312 . … See Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 77 , 80.

Dillon v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

211 N.E.3d 746 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2023

Most staff dogs in the program did not board for more than 7 consecutive days (Tr. Vol. I at 59-60, 256), but some staff dogs boarded for up to 30 days (Tr. Vol. II at 342-43). … See, e.g., Napier v. Brown, 24 Ohio App.3d 12, 13-16 (2d Dist.1985); Hastings Mut. Ins. v. Halatek, 174 Ohio App.3d 252, 2007-Ohio-6923, ¶ 22-25 (7th Dist.). In doing this, the trial court found that Ms.

State, Ex Rel. Hepperla v. Glander

94 Ohio App. 187 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1949

An appeal was taken to the Supreme Court where the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals was affirmed. City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax Appeals (1950), 153 Ohio St., 97 , 91 N. E. (2d), 480. … City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax Appeals, supra; Zangerle, Auditor, v. City of Cleveland, 145 Ohio St., 347 , 61 N. E. (2d), 720; City of Toledo v. Jenkins et al., Board of Tax Appeals, 143 Ohio St., 141 , 54 N.

Aurora Bank FSB v. Stevens

2014 Ohio 1713 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2014

Koos v. Cent. Ohio Cellular, Inc., 94 Ohio App.3d 579, 588 (8th Dist.1994), citing Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 (4th Dist.1993). … Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A., 83 Ohio App.3d 103, 107 (10th Dist.1992); Brown at 711. We must affirm the trial court's judgment if any grounds the movant raised in the trial court support it. Coventry Twp. v.

Hebeler v. Colerain Twp. Board, Zoning App., Unpublished Decision (4-5-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2000

The trial court properly considered the factors set forth in Duncan v. Middlefield (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 83 , 491 N.E.2d 692 , as we directed it to do on remand from the previous appeal. See Hebeler v. Colerain Twp. … See Duncan, supra ; Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30 , 465 N.E.2d 848 ; Cash v. Cincinnati Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1996), 117 Ohio App.3d 319 , 690 N.E.2d 593 .

Airport Partners, Ltd. v. Limbach

63 Ohio App. 3d 141 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 30, 1989

Appellant APL sought the exemption pursuant to R.C. 5709.08 and 5709.10. 1 The Board of Tax Appeals cited Carney v. … The board likened the land issue to that in Cleveland v. Carney.

In Re Warren, 2007ca00054 (10-22-2007)

2007 Ohio 5703 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 2007

Morris Co. v. … Blakemore v.

Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.

14 Ohio App. 2d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1968

Graham, a Taxpayer, v. Board of County Commrs. of Summit County, and Smith v. Board of County Commrs. of Summit County, 123 Ohio St. 362 , and the Supreme Court decided in those cases: “2. … However, in the case of Hofius v.

Joseph & Feiss Co. v. Lindley

11 Ohio App. 3d 80 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1983

Co. v. Kosydar (1975), 43 Ohio St. 2d 75 [ 72 O.O.2d 42 ]. … The court held in PPG Industries v.

State v. Ward

2024 Ohio 2038 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 28, 2024

Brown v. Dayton, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24900, 2012-Ohio-3493, ¶ 24; see also State v. Luke, 3d Dist. Defiance No. 4-98-13, 1999 WL 84682 (Feb. 1, 1999). … State v.

Thorpe v. Amrine

66 Ohio App. 128 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1940

-State ex rel v Allman, 27 Abs 355 . … A discretionary duty, with great power, is confided to the Board under the statutes.

State ex rel. Fulton Foundry & Machine Co. v. Industrial Commission

78 Ohio Law. Abs. 538 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1957

Lyons v. Industrial Commission, 42 Oh Ap 132; Industrial Commission v. Monroe, 111 Oh St 812. … The Board of Review reversed the finding of the administrator and granted an award retroactive to March 18, 1955.

1799-1873 Beall v. Cleveland Board, Bldg., Unpublished Decision (3-16-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 2000

SPELLACY JUDGE 1799-1873 BEALL AVE. v. CLEV. BD., BLDG. S., ___ Ohio App.3d ___ (3-16-2000) ___ N.E.2d ___ 1799-1873 BEALL AVE. CO., INC. Appellant vs. CLEVELAND BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS AND BUILDING APPEALS, ET AL. … See Mahoney v. Berea (1986), 33 Ohio App.3d 94 and Martin v. Bedford Heights (Aug. 20. 1998), Cuyahoga App. No. 73725, unreported. See, also, Trademark Homes v.

Crossbridge, Inc. v. Shank

74 Ohio App. 3d 779 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1991

In Citizens Commt. v. … In Dorrian v. Scioto Conserv.

Hill v. Gatz

63 Ohio App. 2d 170 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 3, 1979

Board of Regents v. Roth (1972), 408 U.S. 564, 569 . … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 .” See Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz (1978), 435 U.S. 78, 82 ; Perry v. Sindermann (1972), 408 U.S. 593, 599-603 . Clearly, any reference to R.

State v. Robles

65 Ohio App. 3d 104 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1989

See State v. Chapin (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 437 , 21 O.O.3d 273 , 424 N.E.2d 317 ; State v. … State v. Cowans (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 96 , 39 O.O.2d 97 , 227 N.E.2d 201 ; State v.

Reynolds v. Board of Mrdd, Stark County, Unpublished Decision (2-23-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 2000

Assignments of error are as follows: I THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN GRANTING APPELLEE BOARD'S MOTION TO DISMISS. … Hanson v. Guernsey Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 545 .

Franklin Cty. Sheriff's Dept. v. SERB

5 Ohio App. Unrep. 296 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1990

Code, the Supreme Court concluded that "'the Board's construction here, while it may not be required by the Act, is at least permissible under it *** .'" Id. at 402-403 (quoting N.L.R.B. v. J. … General Drivers and Helpers Union v. Brown Cty. (S.D. 1978), 269 N.W.2d 795, 799-800 .