Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.43s
Reed v. Multi-Cty. Juvenile Sys.
2010 Ohio 6602 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 2010
Gallagher v. Cleveland Browns Football Co. (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 427, 432-433, 659 N.E.2d 1232. … Board of Cty Commrs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown (1997), 520 U.S. 397, 403-404, 117 S.Ct. 1382, 137 L.Ed.2d 626.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBlack v. Mecca Township Bot, Unpublished Decision (2-15-2005)
2005 Ohio 561 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2005
Bd. of Park Commrs. of Lake Metroparks v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co. (1999), 131 Ohio App.3d 412 , 417 , citing State v. S.R. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 590 , 594 . … Davis v. Willoughby (1962), 173 Ohio St. 338 , paragraph one of syllabus; Gulf Oil Corp. v. Kosydar (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 208 , paragraph one of syllabus; Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty.
Cited 4 timesUnpublished56 Ohio App. 2d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1978
In Diebler v. … Kelley Co. v. Cleveland (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 150 , and DeLong v. Board of Edn. (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 62 .
Cited 3 timesPublished2014 Ohio 2287 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 27, 2014
State v. Helms, 7th Dist. … Id. at ¶ 49, quoting State v. Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d 447, 895 N.E.2d 149, 2008–Ohio–4569, ¶ 50 (Lanzinger, J., concurring in judgment only).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSpitzer Autoworld Akron, L.L.C. v. Fred Martin Motor Co.
2024 Ohio 3394 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2024
See Pohle v. … RPM, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished111 Ohio App. 18 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1959
so, the Board abused its discretion by ruling against her application. … The plaintiff cites the case of Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Mentor Township, 168 Oh St 113, 151 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished2016 Ohio 2965 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 13, 2016
. {¶ 37} As this Court further noted in Brown v. … Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedState v. Price, 22380 (9-19-2008)
2008 Ohio 4746 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2008
State v. Wilcoxson , Montgomery App. … State v. Holloway , Clark App.
Cited 2 timesPublishedYoung v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections
2022 Ohio 1432 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2022
Waters v. Spaeth, 131 Ohio No. 22AP-214 4 St.3d 55, 2012-Ohio-69, ¶ 6, citing State ex rel. Eshleman v. … Greene v. Montgomery Cty.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDublin v. RiverPark Group, L.L.C.
2022 Ohio 1294 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 2022
Griffey v. … Richard v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFairlawn Meats, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America
99 Ohio App. 517 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 1955
It is thus apparent that, even where jurisdiction does lodge in the National Labor Relations Board, there is an opportunity for the union to appeal to that board, but, in the instant case, without a majority of the employees … Although counsel for the union insist that the National Labor Relations Board does have jurisdiction, it seems to us that the picketing engaged in herein was part of a plan to avoid an election by such board, and thus deprive
Cited 3 timesPublishedDevan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
2015 Ohio 4279 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 2015
The court’s review of the evidence should be thorough and comprehensive and should ensure that its final determination is more than a mere rubber stamping of the board of revision’s determination. Black v. … Appellants appealed to the board of tax appeals (“BTA”), and following a hearing, the BTA affirmed the board’s dismissal of appellants’ complaint for the same reasons as the board.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDelong v. South Point Board of Education, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2001
Plaintiff-Appellant Leslie Delong asserts that he intended to appeal to this Court the judgment of the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, which affirmed the decision of Defendant-Appellee South Point Local School District Board … Louis, Inc. v. Zimmer Co .
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2017 Ohio 7362 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2017
Stewart v. … Therefore, she purchased a board, which she had cut into two at a hardware store. She nailed the boards together and placed them on the middle step.
Cited 3 timesPublishedShelby Realty, Inc. v. Village of Springdale
27 Ohio App. 2d 204 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1971
In the case of Sibarco Corp. v. … See Berg v. Struthers, 176 Ohio St. 146 ; also, Remy v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCoates v. Ottawa County Board of Revision, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 2002
It is from this order that the Ottawa County Board of Revision and the Ottawa County Auditor have appealed. … Meijer Realty Co. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 1202 .
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTrans Rail America, Inc. v. Enyeart, 07ap-273 (12-31-2007)
2007 Ohio 7144 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2007
As this court stated in Youngstown Sheet Tube Co. v. … For example, in Dayton Power Light Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMuchinnippi Creek & Miami River Improvement Number 2 v. Wildermuth
35 Ohio App. 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1929
It is insisted by counsel for defendants in error that the rule enounced in the fourth proposition of *223 the syllabus in the case of Rambarger v. Curl et al., Commrs., 115 Ohio St., 81 , 152 N. … State, ex rel., v. Edmondson, 89 Ohio St., 93 , 107, 105 N. E., 269 , 52 L. R. A. (N. S.), 305, Ann. Cas. 1915D, 934.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLund v. Portsmouth Local Air Agency
2014 Ohio 2741 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2014
See, e.g., In re L.W., 168 Ohio App.3d 613, 2006-Ohio-644, ¶ 11 (10th Dist.), citing In re Brown, 10th Dist. No. 03AP-1205, 2005-Ohio-2425, ¶ 15. … McClead v. McClead, 4th Dist. No. 06CA67, 2007-Ohio-4624, ¶ 12.
Cited 11 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Interstate Motor Freight System v. O'Neill
104 Ohio App. 309 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1957
Co. v. Boys, Dir., 296 Ill., 166 , 129 N. E., 724 , and State, ex rel., v. Insurance Co., 49 Ohio St., 440 , 31 N. E., 658 , 34 Am. St. Rep., 573 , 16 L. R. A., 611. … While there may be some doubt that respondents’ exception 4 to the Report of the Special Master Commissioner can be sustained under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Interstate Motor Freight System v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna