Case law

Kroger Co. v. Limbach

68 Ohio App. 3d 330 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1990

This court in Petrie v. Lindley (Feb. 19, 1986), Hamilton App. No. … In these circumstances, while Coca-Cola v.

Robinson v. Richter, Unpublished Decision (5-27-2004)

2004 Ohio 2716 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 27, 2004

Robinson and Edward V. … Sun Refining Marketing Co. v. Brennan (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 306 , 511 N.E.2d 112 , syllabus.

Cmk, Ltd. v. Board of County Comms., Unpublished Decision (9-5-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 2003

CMK, Ltd. v. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. , 9th Dist. No. 02CA008185, 2003-Ohio-4388 , at ¶ 13. … City School Dist. v. State Bd. of Edn. (1992), 85 Ohio App.3d 117 .

State v. Kwambana

2014 Ohio 2582 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2014

State v. Brown, 186 Ohio App.3d 437, 2010-Ohio-324, ¶ 7 (12th Dist.). … State v. Lung, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2012-03-004, 2012-Ohio-5352, ¶ 16.

Lewis v. Douglass

12 Ohio App. 386 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1919

The answer of defendants, after admitting the official capacity of the board of county commissioners, denies the other allegations of the petition. … The following, among other Ohio authorities, might be cited upon the above proposition, namely: Hoshor v. Commrs. of Fairfield County, 14 C. C., N. S., 198, affirmed by supreme court, 84 Ohio St., 503 ; Smith et al. v.

Rose v. Whitney

2020 Ohio 5358 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2020

Barr v. Jones, 160 Ohio App.3d 320, 2005-Ohio-1488, 827 N.E.2d 348, ¶ 13 (5th Dist.); see also Boutros v. Noffsinger, 8th Dist. … was an agent of the state); Halley v.

S. A. Ruebel & Co. v. Bowers

118 Ohio App. 35 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1962

This court feels, as stated in Tom’s Express, Inc., v. … Cedar Hill Farms, v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 147 Ohio St., 30 , a case dealing with an appeal from the board to a court, and especially the opinion of Judge Zimmerman at page 36. See, also, Moore v.

Fulton, Supt. of Bks. v. Busher, Clk. of Cts.

47 Ohio App. 169 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1933

”” It is obvious that funds under the control of the Park Board are public funds and while under the control of said Board are subject to this depository act. … That question was discussed in the case of State ex The Toledo Theatres and Realty Co. v Fulton, Supt. of Banks, 124 Oh St 360.

Hessley v. Giles

27 Ohio App. 3d 184 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 20, 1985

The claimant then appealed to the board of review (the “board”). On December 28, 1982, a referee held a hearing in Ashtabula, Ohio. … Superior Metal Products, Inc. v.

In Re Underwood

64 Ohio App. 3d 326 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1989

In State v. … In State v. Eskridge (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 56, 59 , 526 N.E.2d 304, 307 , the Supreme Court, citing State v.

State v. Dankworth

172 Ohio App. 3d 159 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 2007

State v. Brown, 98 Ohio St.3d 121 , 2002-Ohio-7040 , 781 N.E.2d 159 . … Brown, supra. However, the State had already filed its ‘Rule 16 Compliance’ on May 1, 2002.

Hansford v. Public Employees Retirement System

170 Ohio App. 3d 603 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2007

Dreger v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Sys. (1987), 34 Ohio St.3d 17, 21 , 516 N.E.2d 214 ; Erb v. Erb (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 18, 22 , 661 N.E.2d 175 ; Cosby v. Cosby, 96 Ohio St.3d 228, 232 , 2002-Ohio-4170 , 773 N.E.2d 516 . … Retirement Sys. v.

Corbin v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

77 Ohio App. 3d 626 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1991

His former employer then appealed to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (hereinafter “board of review”), which set the matter for hearing before a referee on June 1, 1990. … . *632 As was noted in Hardman v.

White v. Westfall

183 Ohio App. 3d 807 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2009

Koos v. Cent. Ohio Cellular, Inc. (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 579, 588 , 641 N.E.2d 265 , citing Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . … Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A. (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 103, 107 , 614 N.E.2d 765 ; Brown at 711, 622 N.E.2d 1153 .

State v. Skorvanek

182 Ohio App. 3d 615 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2009

State v. … of Pharmacy); State v.

Porter v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services

70 Ohio App. 3d 240 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1990

As was stated by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Noernberg v. … Lieux, v. Westlake (1951), 154 Ohio St. 412 [ 43 O.O. 343 , 96 N.E.2d 414 ], * * * ” Id. at 29, 17 O.O.3d at 18 , 406 N.E.2d at 1097 .

State v. American Veterans Post No. 250

37 Ohio App. 3d 108 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1987

Brown (1984), 20 Ohio App. 3d 36 , 20 OBR 39, 484 N.E. 2d 215 , paragraph one of the syllabus. … Illinois v. Gates (1983), 462 U.S. 213 ; State v. Brown, supra, at paragraph four of the syllabus. Summary Defendant-appellant’s assignment of error is overruled and the conviction is hereby affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

State, Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. Zupnik

95 Ohio App. 367 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1953

See also: Gibbs v. Minneapolis Fire Dept. Relief Assoc. 125 Minn. 174 , 145 N. W. 1075 ; 54 A. L. R. 943, 98 A. L. R. 505 and 112 A. L. R. 1009 and cases cited therein. … regulations of the board.

State, Ex Rel. Judy v. Wandstrat

62 Ohio App. 3d 627 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1989

Hoover v. Bd. of Franklin Cty. Commrs. (1985), 19 Ohio St.3d 1, 6 , 19 OBR 1, 5, 482 N.E.2d 575, 580 ; see, also, State, ex rel. Dix, v. Celeste (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 141 , 11 OBR 436, 464 N.E.2d 153 ; Pim v. … Battin, v. Bush (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 236 , 533 N.E.2d 301 .

Webb v. Ironton City Schools

115 Ohio App. 3d 699 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1996

Chapter 2506 limits the court’s review to final orders of officers and boards. … Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 452, 453 , 613 N.E.2d 580, 582 ; Herrick v.