Case law

State, Ex Rel. Pfeifer v. Stoneking

80 Ohio App. 70 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1946

Rep., 308 ; United States v. Ballin, 144 U. S., 1, 7 (1892), 36 L. Ed., 321 , 12 S. Ct., 507 ; State, ex rel. Cline, v. Wilkesville Township, 20 Ohio St., 288 , 293 (1870). … Fifty West Broad, Inc., v. Poulson, 75 Ohio App., 194 , 58 N. E. (2d), 483; State, ex rel. Humker, v. Hummel, 143 Ohio St., 604 , 56 N. E. (2d), 167.

Higginbottom v. Hunsinger-Stuff

2024 Ohio 631 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 2024

State v. Higginbottom, 11th Dist. … Lucci v. Turner, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2020-L-085, 2020-Ohio-4697, ¶ 4 citing Rockwell v. Geauga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2005-G-2661, 2005-Ohio-5762. See also, Brown v.

State v. Wohl

2017 Ohio 4367 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 2017

State v. Brown, 186 Ohio App.3d 437, 2010-Ohio-324, ¶ 7 (12th Dist.). … State v. Chamberlain, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2013-04-004, 2013-Ohio-4619, ¶ 71.

State v. Chasteen

2013 Ohio 3573 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2013

In State v. … See State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, ¶ 24. {¶ 27} The Court also addressed the parole board's authority in imposing postrelease control.

Progressive Equity Invests., L.L.C. v. Painesville Twp. Bd. of Trustees

2023 Ohio 180 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2023

Burger King Corp. v. … Painesville v. Lake Cty.

Davidson v. Keller

9 Ohio App. 2d 340 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1967

Parker v. Young, Admr. (1961), 172 Ohio St. 464 ; Starr v. Young, Admr. (1961), 172 Ohio St. 317 ; American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Glander, Tax Commr. (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147 (Board of Tax Appeals); Lutz v. … Evatt, Tax Commr. (1945), 144 Ohio St. 341 (Board of Tax Appeals); Oliver v. Evatt, Tax Commr. (1944), 144 Ohio St. 231 (Board of Tax Appeals); Mosholder Motor Freight, Inc., v.

In re H.J.

104 N.E.3d 51 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 2018

DIANE V. … In re K.H., 119 Ohio St.3d 538, 2008-Ohio-4825, 895 N.E.2d 809, ¶ 42, quoting Cross v.

State v. Taylor

2 Ohio App. 3d 394 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1982

The appellant relies on State v. … McNulty v.

In Re Cleveland Clinic Foundation

94 Ohio App. 3d 348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1994

This distinction was set out in Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. … Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. (1982), 455 U.S. 422 , 102 S.Ct. 1148 , 71 L.Ed.2d 265 .

Hammontree v. Hawley

40 Ohio Law. Abs. 483 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1943

H., 147; Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v City of New York, 247 App. Div. 163 ; Acme Finance Co. v Huse, 192 Wash. 96 ; Erwin Billiard Parlor v Buckner, Sheriff, 156 Tenn., 278 . … State ex v O’Brien et, 130 Oh St 23.

In Re Carroll

28 Ohio App. 3d 6 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1985

See Brown v. Executive 200, Inc. (1980), 64 Ohio St. 2d 250 [ 18 O.O.3d 446 ]. A sanction for civil contempt must allow the contemnor to purge himself of the contempt. Tucker v. Tucker (1983), 10 Ohio App. 3d 251 . … See Brown, supra, at 253 , citing United States v. United Mine Workers (1947), 330 U.S. 258 (willful violation of restraining order). 10 Within the factual context of the case at bar, see Schneider v.

Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Trustees v. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc.

174 N.E.3d 447 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2021

Supreme Court (NLRB v. J. … Id. at ¶ 23, quoting Board of County Commrs. v.

Yates v. Wallingford

7 Ohio App. 3d 316 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1982

Potten, v. … Appellants rely upon the decision of this court in Cliff v. Oney (Dec. 21, 1978), Franklin App.

Bank of Am. v. Miller

2016 Ohio 7017 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 2016

Mahoning County Board of Developmental Disabilities et al., 7th Dist. No. 14 MA 0174, 0177, 0180, 0181, 2016–Ohio–4815, and the Eighth District's judgment in Kerber v. Cuyahoga Hts., 8th Dist. … Section 3(B)(4), Article V, Ohio Constitution.

Westfall v. Notman

18 Ohio Law. Abs. 407 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1934

Brown was called as the first witness, and at the time of testifying was Municipal Judge of the city of Alliance, and also a lawyer. … This is the second paragraph of the syllabus in Behrens v Behrens, 47 Oh St, 323. Counsel also made another request: ‘Request No. 3.

Abbott v. Truscon Steel Corp.

78 Ohio Law. Abs. 136 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1957

Curran v. Brookes, 142 Oh St 107; Daily v. Dowty, 52 Oh Ap 84; Andrews v. Ackerman Coal Co., 59 Oh Ap 65: Wainscott v. Young, 81 Oh Ap 21; and State, ex rel. Longman v. Welsh, 133 Oh St 244. … In distinguishing the case of Roscoe v.

State v. Eaton

192 N.E.3d 1236 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2022

Blake v. … Id. at 11, citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Griger v. Scholz

56 Ohio Law. Abs. 340 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1950

See: Turner v. Central Outdoor Advertising Co. Inc. 15 Oh Ap 105. … Wetmore v. Mellinger, 64 Iowa 741 , 18 N. W. 870 , 52 Am. Rep. 465 ; Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co. 175 Ill. 619 ; 51 N. E. 569 .

State v. Glandon, Unpublished Decision (1-6-2006)

2006 Ohio 39 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2006

State v. … Appellant has failed to do so." {¶ 18} We find State v. Brown persuasive. Glandon's proper remedy was to file a mandamus action against the warden at the London Correctional Institution.

State v. Weeden

2011 Ohio 2277 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 2011

[Cite as State v. Weeden, 2011-Ohio-2277.] … Hence, the trial court’s advisement that “the parole board on your release from prison may at their discretion place you on postrelease control for up to three years” was correct.