Case law

State, Ex Rel. Pfeifer v. Stoneking

80 Ohio App. 70 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1946

Rep., 308 ; United States v. Ballin, 144 U. S., 1, 7 (1892), 36 L. Ed., 321 , 12 S. Ct., 507 ; State, ex rel. Cline, v. Wilkesville Township, 20 Ohio St., 288 , 293 (1870). … Fifty West Broad, Inc., v. Poulson, 75 Ohio App., 194 , 58 N. E. (2d), 483; State, ex rel. Humker, v. Hummel, 143 Ohio St., 604 , 56 N. E. (2d), 167.

State v. Ruppart

187 Ohio App. 3d 192 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2010

. {¶ 3} The charges arose out of a dispute between three men living in a boarding house. … See, generally, Browning v. State (1929), 120 Ohio St. 62, 70-71 [, 165 N.E. 566 ]; State v.

State Ex Rel. Martin Land Development Co. v. Clepper

113 Ohio App. 375 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 1961

So, in Bay (Village) v. … First National Bank, v.

Setters v. Durrani

164 N.E.3d 1159 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2020

According to the Ohio Medical Board: “[I]n advance of a trip to Pakistan, Dr. … See also Monus v. Day, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 10MA35, 2011-Ohio-3170; Brown v. Miller, 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2012-G-3055, 2012-Ohio-5223.

State v. Pierce

2011 Ohio 2361 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 2011

No. 00-CA-G-11-035 (finding a remand for a board hearing to be futile based on subsequent events in the case). {¶15} Appellant’s First Assignment of Error is therefore overruled. … State v. Brown, Tuscarawas App.No. 2009AP050024, 2010-Ohio-1110, ¶ 22, citing State v. Batchili, 113 Ohio St.3d 403, 865 N.E.2d 1282, 2007-Ohio-2204, ¶ 12, and State v. Bolden, Preble App.No.

Janson v. John Beninato Zoning Inspector

2016 Ohio 2796 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2, 2016

Akron v. … Goralsky v. Taylor, 59 Ohio St.3d 197, 198, 571 N.E.2d 720 (1991); May v. Lubinski, 9th Dist. Summit No. 26528, 2013-Ohio-2173, ¶46.

Gill v. Reese

53 Ohio App. 134 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1936

S. v Bank of Georgia, 9 Wheat, 904, 807, 6 L. Ed. 244 ; Turnpike Road Co. v Wallace, 8 Watts 316, 138 ; Seymour v Turnpike Co., 10 Ohio 476 ; Haines et v Ship Building Co., 110 Atl. 788 . … The broad principle of law applicable to this case is set forth in the case of Coupler Co. v U. S. Shipping Board, etc., 261 Fed. 716 .

Gajovski v. Estate of Philabaun

192 Ohio App. 3d 755 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2011

Philabaun mentioned giving appellant credit for $66,000 of the purchase price for the work he performed during the 2007 season in addition to free room and board. … LeFort v.

Rei v. Rhodes

108 Ohio App. 3d 225 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1995

Relying on O’Connor v. … Gorman, P.J., Marianna Brown Bettman and Painter, JJ., concur.

McKee v. Liming

31 Ohio App. 303 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 1928

Klein v. Lust, 110 OS. 197 . The chapter of the code beginning with Section 11268 GC., fixes generally the counties in which actions may be brought. … Ohio, this action was properly brought in Brown County, and this is wholly independent of Section 6308 GC.

State v. Sims

127 Ohio App. 3d 603 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 22, 1998

As the United States Supreme Court recognized in Brown v. Illinois (1975), 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 , the Fourth and Fifth Amendments involve different interests and serve different policies. … See, also, State v. Davis (Jan. 31, 1994), Brown App. No. CA93-06-007, unreported, 1994 WL 29884 , citing Brown .

State v. O'Halloran

2022 Ohio 1342 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2022

Further, the court stated, “If you are to be released from prison, that would be a decision by the parole board, which they'll make if they choose to do so. … State v. Brown, 2017-Ohio-8416, 99 N.E.3d 1135, ¶ 74 (2d Dist.). {¶ 10} In reviewing felony sentences, appellate courts must apply the standard of review set forth in R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). State v.

In re The Chadwick 135

2012 Ohio 5955 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2012

Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 465 N.E.2d 848. … Blakemore v.

Ferritto v. City of Twinsburg, Unpublished Decision (3-19-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2003

On October 19, 2000, appellant filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against appellee and the Summit County Board of Elections ("the Board") regarding the validity of City of Twinsburg Ordinance 68-2000 providing for … Gyurcik v. Brown (1964), 176 Ohio St. 288 , 27 Ohio Op.2d 200 , 199 N.E.2d 596 , and State ex rel. Santora v.

Sony Electronics v. Grass Valley Group, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 2002

The Hamilton County Board of Commissioners ("the Board") was responsible for the construction of the Paul Brown Stadium, which Hamilton County owns and leases to the Cincinnati Bengals. … The purpose of entering into the contract, as alleged in the complaint, was to construct the production-control room of the Paul Brown Stadium.

Abbott v. Truscon Steel Corp.

78 Ohio Law. Abs. 136 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1957

Curran v. Brookes, 142 Oh St 107; Daily v. Dowty, 52 Oh Ap 84; Andrews v. Ackerman Coal Co., 59 Oh Ap 65: Wainscott v. Young, 81 Oh Ap 21; and State, ex rel. Longman v. Welsh, 133 Oh St 244. … In distinguishing the case of Roscoe v.

State v. Chasteen

2013 Ohio 3573 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2013

In State v. … See State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, ¶ 24. {¶ 27} The Court also addressed the parole board's authority in imposing postrelease control.

Ohio University Faculty Assn. v. Ohio University

5 Ohio App. 3d 130 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1982

See Roth v. … Assn. v. Lorain Cty.

State v. Houston

2014 Ohio 3911 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2014

State v. … State v. Brown, 101 Ohio App.3d 784, 788, 656 N.E.2d 741 (1st Dist.1995). The Ohio Supreme Court, in dicta, acknowledged that: [o]ne may use a BB gun (State v. Ewing [Mar. 27, 1980], Cuyahoga App.

State v. Bankston

2024 Ohio 3017 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2024

The Ohio Supreme Court, in State v. … In State v.