Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.63s

  • McCloud v. Lorain Cty. Corr. Inst.

    2026 Ohio 2231 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2026

    No. 26CA000102 v. … Robinson v. Fender, 2022-Ohio-3701, ¶ 5. When a petition is filed in the wrong county, dismissal is appropriate. Id. at ¶ 5-6; Brown v. Hall, 123 Ohio St.3d 381, 2009-Ohio-5592, ¶ 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bogen v. Clemmer

    12 Ohio Law. Abs. 85 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1931

    In the still more recent case of Miami County v Dayton, 92 Oh St, 215, the conservancy act was under consideration. … This provision, however, is subject to the power of the board to adopt an of State ex v Industrial Commission, supra, equivalent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Parma Heights v. Jaros

    69 Ohio App. 3d 623 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1990

    Brown (1953), 195 Tenn. 501 , 260 S.W.2d 264 . … Brown, supra, 195 Tenn. at 512 , 260 S.W.2d at 269 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Stauffer v. Smith

    2015 Ohio 4240 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2015

    Stokes v. … Morgan v. Arshinkoff, 15 Ohio App.3d 101, 472 N.E.2d 1134 (9th Dist.1984) (the court took judicial notice of the election of common pleas judges in a given year); Browne v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Tipton

    2021 Ohio 1128 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2021

    State v. Fabian, 12th Dist. Warren No. … See State v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109007, 2020- Ohio-4474. {¶ 16} We find that appellant is unable to establish any prejudice by the trial court's postrelease control misstatement.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Luscre-Miles v. Dept. of Education., 2008-P-0048 (12-19-2008)

    2008 Ohio 6781 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2008

    Pons v. Ohio State Med. … Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Farnsworth v. McCabe

    66 Ohio App. 482 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1940

    Chapman, v. Miller and Randall v. … Sullivan v. State, ex rel. O’ Connor, supra. But no such charge is made against the board or any of its members.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 2216 Sa, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Commi., 07ap-600 (12-27-2007)

    2007 Ohio 7014 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 2007

    Lies v. Veterinary Med. Bd. (1981), 2 Ohio App.3d 204 , 207 , quoting Andrews v. Bd. of Liquor Control (1955), 164 Ohio St. 275 , 280 . … See, e.g., Meslat v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Current Source, Inc. v. Elyria City School District

    157 Ohio App. 3d 765 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2004

    Temple v. … no power to act on the board’s behalf.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Ray v. Jones

    57 Ohio Law. Abs. 426 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1950

    Gwynne v. Niswanger, 15 Ohio 367 . We are of the opinion that defendant was afforded ample opportunity to protect his interest and that by his own neglect he is now estopped to assert his claim. … City of South Euclid v. Zangerle, 145 Oh St 433, 62 N. E. 2d 160 , 161 that: “1.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint of Sarver

    70 Ohio App. 3d 471 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1990

    Angelkovski v. Buckeye Potato Chips Co. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 159 , 11 OBR 242, 463 N.E.2d 1280 . … See Bostic v. Connor (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 144 , 524 N.E.2d 881 ; Lancaster Colony Corp. v. Limbach (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 198 , 524 N.E.2d 1389 ; Stratso v. Song (1984), 17 Ohio App.3d 39 , 17 OBR 93, 477 N.E.2d 1176 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Weaver

    2018 Ohio 2998 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 2018

    Weaver lived with his father until 2013 when his father became critically ill and the Medina Board of Developmental Disabilities (“the Board”) assisted Mr. Weaver in obtaining his own apartment. … BROWN, Attorneys at Law, for Appellant. S. FORREST THOMPSON, Prosecuting Attorney, and VINCENT V. VIGLUICCI, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Trianon Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. Department of Liquor Control

    118 Ohio App. 255 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1962

    Trianon appealed the department’s rejection order to the Board of Liquor Control, herein called the board, before which a hearing was had. … only when such a question of construction is involved that the reviewing court also may consider and determine the sufficiency of the evidence. *258 This has been expressly held by the Supreme Court in the ease of Katz v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. McCuller

    2015 Ohio 3124 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2015

    Foreman v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist. No. 14AP- 15, 2014-Ohio-2793, ¶ 10; Brown v. Ohio Tax Commr., 10th Dist. … Brown at ¶ 14, citing Cerrone v. Univ. of Toledo, 10th Dist. No. 11AP-573, 2012-Ohio-953, ¶ 5; Southgate Dev. Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transm.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jett v. Interim Healthcare, 22727 (12-5-2008)

    2008 Ohio 6332 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2008

    Osborne v. Lyles (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 326 . Further, the issues of law involved are reviewed de novo. Nilavar v. … Jett relies on Browning v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Lowman Lumber Co., 22398 (1-9-2009)

    2009 Ohio 63 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2009

    circumstances: {¶ 11} "* * * {¶ 12} "(4) If, acting with the kind of culpability otherwise required for the commission of the offense, its commission was authorized, requested, commanded, tolerated, or performed by the board … We disagree. {¶ 18} In Patterson v. V M Auto Body (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 573 , 589 N.E.2d 1306 , the plaintiff brought suit against V M Auto Body, a sole proprietorship owned by an individual, Victor Searfoss.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seccombe v. Slicker

    37 Ohio App. 389 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1929

    Co. v. Wendt, 120 Ohio St., 197 , 165 N. … Sorochak, a Minor, v. Reed, 31 Ohio App., 401 , 166 N. E., 918 , first paragraph of syllabus.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sethi v. Wfmj Television Inc.

    134 Ohio App. 3d 796 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1999

    Bruss v. Vindicator Printing Co. (1996), 109 Ohio App.3d 396 , 672 N.E.2d 238 citing Hersch v. E.W. … In Dinkel v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    12 Ohio App. 3d 31 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1983

    Morgan v. … This court has not found such rationale persuasive in the cause before us and, consequently, our decision herein will be in conflict with McCallister v. Board of Review (April 9, 1982), Montgomery App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McDill v. Sunbridge Care Ents., Inc.

    2013 Ohio 1618 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2013

    Browning v. Burt, 66 PICKAWAY, 12CA8 6 Ohio St.3d 544, 557, 613 N.E.2d 993 (1993). … Compare Hill v. Wadsworth, supra, with Grubb v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.