Case law

Truett v. Community Mutual Insurance

91 Ohio App. 3d 741 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1993

Without a showing of internal inconsistency or bad faith or some other ground for calling the board’s decision into question, the outcome may not be reversed as arbitrary or capricious. Davis v. Kentucky Finance Cos. … Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (C.A.6, 1991), 925 F.2d 979, 986 . In making this analysis, the trial court may not consider any evidence if it was not considered by the insurance company’s review board. Berry v.

Vickers v. Canal Pointe Nursing Home & Rehab Ctr.

2016 Ohio 3244 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 2016

Canal Pointe relied upon Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. … See Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 228 W.Va. 646 (2011).

State Ex Rel. Helsel v. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Commr.

83 Ohio App. 388 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1948

the prayer of plaintiff’s petition is: “* * * that upon finad hearing hereof the court order the defendant corporation to refund the $200,000.00 to the defendant Board, and that the defendant Board, be ordered to convey … of Richmond Heights and Highland Heights supersede the right of eminent domain, exercised by the state or the county as a subdivision thereof; the question of whether or not the injunction issued in the case of Swetland v

O.A.P.S.E. v. Bd. of Edn.

69 Ohio App. 2d 101 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1980

In Civil Service Personnel Assn. v. … V. Assignment of Error No. 4: "4.

In Re Annexation of 816 Acres

91 Ohio App. 3d 500 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1993

Williams v. Jerry L. Kaltenbach Ent., Inc., supra. Accordingly, appellant’s second assignment of error is not well taken. … B Appellant relies on Middletown v.

Allen v. Sheipline, Commrs.

49 Ohio App. 249 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1934

State ex v Henry, 23 C.C. (N.S.) 541. … This view is in accord with the decision in the case of Thomas v Board of Commissioners, 28 Oh Ap 8, ( 1 Abs 438 ; 1 Abs 506 ; 6 Abs 599 ), in which in subdivisions 7 and 8 of the syllabus, it is held: “County auditor’s failure

State ex rel. Quolke v. Strongsville City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

2013 Ohio 4481 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 2013

GALLAGHER, J.: {¶1} On April 3, 2013, the relator, David Quolke, commenced this public records mandamus action against the respondents, the Strongsville City School District Board of Education (“the Board”); John … Operators’ Labor Council v. Cleveland, 8th Dist.

Young Israel of Beachwood v. City of Beachwood

138 Ohio App. 3d 89 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2000

Notice of Appeal from the City of Beachwood Board of Zoning Appeals, Number BZA 98 — B; and “2. Praecipe. … Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1988), 55 Ohio App.3d 124 , 562 N.E.2d 921 ; Hirt’s Greenhouse, Inc. v. Strongsville (Sept. 7, 1995), Cuyahoga App. No. 68374, unreported, 1995 WL 527408 .

Kasper Invest. Properties, L.L.C. v. Put-in-Bay Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2015 Ohio 4628 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2015

Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Twp. … Sullivan v. Put-in-Bay Township Zoning Board of Appeals, 6th Dist. Ottawa No. OT-94- 048, 1995 WL 413155 (Jul. 14, 1995). At issue in Sullivan was the previous owners’ 14.

State v. Scott

2013 Ohio 5875 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2013

.’ {¶35} “The rule in Ohio, as expressed in Griffin v. State (1868), 18 Ohio St. 438; Browning v. State (1929), 120 Ohio St. 62, 165 N.E. 566; and State v. … Id.; see also McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120, 130 S.Ct. 665, 673, 175 L.Ed.2d 582(2010) (reaffirming this standard); State v. Fry, 125 Ohio St.3d 163, 926 N.E.2d 1239, 2010–Ohio–1017, ¶ 146; State v.

State v. Washington

56 Ohio App. 2d 129 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1978

Stovall v. Denno (1967), 388 U. S. 293 ; State v. Hancock (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 147 ; State v. Perryman (1976), 49 Ohio St. 2d 14 . … State v. Beach, supra (see also State v. Parker (1948), 150 Ohio St. 22 ; State v. Cimpritz (1953), 158 Ohio St. 490 ; State v. Wozniak (1961), 172 Ohio St. 517 , 520).

State Ex Rel. Ross v. Krichbaum, 07 Ma 151 (12-21-2007)

2007 Ohio 7198 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2007

See, e.g., State v. Brown (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 476 , 481 ; Bryan v. Knapp (1986), 21 Ohio St.3d 64 , syllabus." Id. at ¶ 5. … Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis , 113 Ohio St.3d 410 , 2007-Ohio-2205 , ¶ 33 , citing State ex rel. Non-Employees of Chateau Resident Assn. v.

Lake Hiawatha Park Ass'n v. Knox County Agricultural Society

28 Ohio App. 289 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1927

members of said board were present, two of whom were members of defendant’s board of directors. … Judy v. Louderman, 48 Ohio St., 562 , 29 N. E., 181 .

City of Cleveland v. Limbach

78 Ohio App. 3d 189 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1992

Accordingly, a new evidentiary hearing should have been provided by the Board of Tax Appeals to allow the presentation of new and additional arguments on the part of the city. Cf. Superior Metal Products v. Admr. … Bur. of Employment Services (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 143 , 70 O.O.2d 263 , 324 N.E.2d 179 ; Gennaro Pavers v. Kosydar (1974), 38 Ohio St.2d 174 , 67 O.O.2d 184 , 311 N.E.2d 516 .

State v. Hayes

2025 Ohio 2238 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2025

Allegations of judicial misconduct are investigated by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and judicial-misconduct complaints are heard by the Board of Professional Conduct. … State v. Brown, 2017-Ohio- 7134 (10th Dist.). The state has an affirmative obligation to disclose such information to the defense. State v.

Frecker v. City of Dayton

88 Ohio App. 52 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1949

Board of Commissioners, 11 A. (2) 113. In DeBerry v. City of LaGrange, 8 S. E. (2d) 146 , the Court stated: “As we have said before, the power to regulate such a business is not the equivalent of the power to destroy.” … In State v.

David May Ministries v. Petro, 2007 Ca 1 (7-6-2007)

2007 Ohio 3454 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2007

Wheat v. Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors (July 2, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16918; Nibert v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. and Corr , 84 Ohio St.3d 100 , 102-03 , 1998-Ohio-506 , 702 N.E.2d 70 . … In support of its assertion, David May Ministries relies upon Triplett v. Board of Review (1963), 118 Ohio App. 515 , *Page 9 196 N.E.2d 107 , and Moore v.

Board of Educ. v. Gbr Indus. Park, Unpublished Decision (3-18-2005)

2005 Ohio 1351 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2005

. {¶ 2} This is an appropriation action brought by plaintiff-appellee, the Bridgeport Exempted Village School District Board of Education, involving a large tract of land in Bridgeport owned by appellants. … Citing, Wray v. Allied Indus. Development Corp., 7th Dist. No. 01-CA-188, 2002-Ohio-5214 ; Burke v.

State v. Patton

2022 Ohio 4149 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2022

State v. Brown, 3d Dist. Marion No. 9-16-37, 2017-Ohio-678, ¶ 7, quoting State v. Erskine, 4th Dist. Highland No. 14CA17, 2015-Ohio-710, ¶ 10. … Brown, 2017-Ohio-678, at ¶ 5, quoting State v. James, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 15 MA 0003, 2016-Ohio-4662, ¶ 8.

State v. Massimiani

2026 Ohio 1056 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2026

Massimiani pleaded guilty, and the trial court stated again, in part, that “[a]s these are all felony 4s or lower if you are sent to prison, the parole board may monitor you up to two years, again, that’s the parole board … Given that you are being sent to prison this morning, the Parole Board may monitor you after you are released from prison for up to two years at the discretion of the Parole Board.