Case law

Furnas v. Clay Twp. Trustees

2012 Ohio 5408 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2012

McDonald v. … Harmon v.

Smith v. Ohio Lottery Commission

75 Ohio App. 3d 753 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1991

Harris v. Lewis (1982), 69 Ohio St.2d 577 , 23 O.O.3d 485 , 433 *759 N. E.2d 223; Andrews v. Board of Liquor Control (1955), 164 Ohio St. 275 , 58 O.O. 51 , 131 N.E.2d 390 . … Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30 , 12 OBR 26, 465 N.E.2d 848 .

Anthony v. Titus, Unpublished Decision (6-18-2004)

2004 Ohio 3193 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2004

Brown v. Cty. … Co. v. Xayphonh, 9th Dist.

Dubin v. Security Union Title Insurance

162 Ohio App. 3d 97 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2005

Beder v. … Hoang v.

Stanfield v. United States Steel Corp.

2013 Ohio 2378 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2013

Viock v. … While Kim Black-Brown averred the U.S.

State v. Hake

2026 Ohio 1393 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 2026

State v. … State v.

State v. Thompson

134 Ohio App. 3d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1999

In Texas v. … Brown, supra.” In Ornelas v.

State ex rel. Froehlich & Emery Eng. Co. v. Evans

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1927

State ex Heyers v. Board of Education, 95 OS. 367 . We are of the opinion that it should be given the construction of “shall”' or “must” in this section. … State ex Pebbles v. Griffin, Treas. 4 C. C. 156, affirmed by the Supreme Court of Ohio, 21 O. L. B. 243.

Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. v. Hamilton

180 N.E.3d 556 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2021

Ohio Dept. of Agriculture v. Brown, 12th Dist. Clermont No. … Smith v. Gray, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2013-11-011, 2014-Ohio-4175, ¶ 13, quoting Estate of Everhart v. Everhart, 12th Dist. Fayette Nos. CA2013-07-019 and CA2013-09-026, 2014- Ohio-2476, ¶ 26.

Whitehurst v. Perry Township

114 Ohio App. 3d 729 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1996

New Orleans v. … Stores, Inc. v. Brown (1956), 165 Ohio St. 521 , 60 O.O. 486 , 138 N.E.2d 248 . See, also, Crabtree v. Young (1965), 1 Ohio St.2d 93 , 30 O.O.2d 335 , 204 N.E.2d 685 .

Drop Bar, L.L.C. v. Cleveland

2013 Ohio 4797 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2013

[Cite as Drop Bar, L.L.C. v. Cleveland, 2013-Ohio-4797.] … Chirila v. Ohio State Chiropractic Bd., 145 Ohio App.3d 589, 592, 763 N.E.2d 1192 (10th Dist.2001), citing Steinfels v.

State, Ex Rel. Cox v. Lopeman

13 Ohio App. 3d 192 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1984

Cox, seeks a writ of mandamus requiring respondent Unemployment Compensation Board of Review to hear and determine his claim for unemployment benefits for the week ending May 8, 1982, which said board has declined to hear … See California Dept. of Human Resources Development v. Java (1971), 402 U.S. 121 . In this case, no hearing has even been scheduled. No justification for such extreme delay has been demonstrated. A writ must issue.

State v. Deckard

100 N.E.3d 53 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2017

Brown then preserved the chain of custody and eventually forwarded the baggie to the BCI Task Force technician. … At that point, Deputy Brown took custody of the evidence and secured it in the evidence room.

Dayton Pub. Schools v. Dayton Civ. Serv. Bd.

2014 Ohio 4702 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 2014

Schools v. Dayton Civ. Serv. Bd., 2014-Ohio-4702.] … Holden v. Board of Education, Findlay City School Dist., 3rd Dist. Hancock No. 5-77-37, 1978 WL 215852, *2 (Oct. 4, 1978). See also All Children Matter v. Ohio Secy. of State, 10th Dist.

Oglesby v. City of Toledo

92 Ohio App. 3d 432 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1993

The board’s construction, in effect, allows the board to engage in piecemeal zoning prohibited by R.C. 713.06. … See Marbury v. Madison (1803), 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 ; State ex rel. Pell v. Westlake (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 360 , 18 O.O.3d 514 , 415 N.E.2d 289 .

Geauga Park Dist. v. Geauga Cty. Budget Comm.

2025 Ohio 3159 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2025

of in the appeals determined by the board . . . … V.

American Watchmakers-Clockmakers Institute, Inc. v. Tracy

138 Ohio App. 3d 747 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2000

An appellate court may reverse a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals only if it is unreasonable or unlawful. R.C. 5717.04; NCR Corp. v. … Stores, Inc. v. Lindley (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 213, 215-216 , 5 OBR 455, 457-458, 450 N.E.2d 687, 689 . It is not a de novo trier of fact and may not substitute its judgment for the board on factual issues.

Harris v. Pristera

194 Ohio App. 3d 120 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2011

The hearing on this citation, held before the board, was entitled “Pittsburgh Mellon Holding Trust v. Ronald Pristera.” … Bd. of Commrs. v.

Welch Avenue Freewill Baptist Church v. Kinney

10 Ohio App. 3d 196 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1983

attached to such buildings necessary for the proper occupancy, use, and enjoyment thereof * * * shall be exempt from taxation. * * *” In construing this section, the Supreme Court in Holy Trinity Protestant Episcopal Church v. … Likewise, the board’s finding that appellant has not demonstrated a *198 right to exemption under R.C. 5709.07 is neither unreasonable nor unlawful.

Scranton-Averell, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer

2013 Ohio 697 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2013

Freeman v. … Industries, Inc. v. Hamilton Cty.