Case law

Hetzer-Young v. Precision Airmotive Corp.

184 Ohio App. 3d 516 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2009

All three on board died. {¶ 3} According to the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) factual report, the aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff. Eyewitnesses to the crash observed that Dr. … See Brown v. Balnius, Richland App. No. 08 CA 47, 2009-Ohio-2671 , 2009 WL 1600992 .

In Re Kroger Co. Shareholders Litigation

70 Ohio App. 3d 52 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1990

P. 23 [c][3] [advisory committee note]); see, also, Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin (C.A. 2, 1968), 391 F.2d 555 ; Gomez v. Board of Ed. (N.D. 111. 1987), 117 F.R.D. 394 . … R. 23(E); Thompson v. Midwest Foundation Indep. Physicians Assn. (S.D. Ohio 1988), 124 F.R.D. 154 ; Bronson v. Board of Ed. (S.D. Ohio 1984), 604 F. Supp. 68 .

State v. Nealen

84 Ohio App. 3d 235 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1992

Brown v. Texas (1979), 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 . On this issue, the Supreme Court stated the following in State v. … Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 [ 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880-1881 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 906-907 , 44 O.O.2d 383 ] * * *[.] a * * * “In Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Ross v. Krichbaum, 07 Ma 151 (12-21-2007)

2007 Ohio 7198 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2007

See, e.g., State v. Brown (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 476 , 481 ; Bryan v. Knapp (1986), 21 Ohio St.3d 64 , syllabus." Id. at ¶ 5. … Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis , 113 Ohio St.3d 410 , 2007-Ohio-2205 , ¶ 33 , citing State ex rel. Non-Employees of Chateau Resident Assn. v.

State v. Washington

56 Ohio App. 2d 129 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1978

Stovall v. Denno (1967), 388 U. S. 293 ; State v. Hancock (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 147 ; State v. Perryman (1976), 49 Ohio St. 2d 14 . … State v. Beach, supra (see also State v. Parker (1948), 150 Ohio St. 22 ; State v. Cimpritz (1953), 158 Ohio St. 490 ; State v. Wozniak (1961), 172 Ohio St. 517 , 520).

State v. Bray

2011 Ohio 4660 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2011

State v. … State v. Brown (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 305, 319.

State v. Waller

44 Ohio Law. Abs. 591 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1943

will do likewise, and to the same extent, on authority of the case of Cerose v Hodge Drive-It-Youself Co., 132 Oh St, 607. … See, also: Bonbright v Biller, 67 Oh Ap., 421; Jackson v Copelan, 50 Oh Ap., 414; Dayton v DeBrosse, 62 Oh Ap., 232.

State Ex Rel. Helsel v. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Commr.

83 Ohio App. 388 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1948

the prayer of plaintiff’s petition is: “* * * that upon finad hearing hereof the court order the defendant corporation to refund the $200,000.00 to the defendant Board, and that the defendant Board, be ordered to convey … of Richmond Heights and Highland Heights supersede the right of eminent domain, exercised by the state or the county as a subdivision thereof; the question of whether or not the injunction issued in the case of Swetland v

Schechter v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (8-9-2005)

2005 Ohio 4062 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2005

(Ibid.) {¶ 70} Finally, board member Browning, who represents the interests of consumers on the board, stated that, "if the Board didn't revoke this license, he doesn't know a case where it could." … Brown, P.J., and Petree, J., concur.

David May Ministries v. Petro, 2007 Ca 1 (7-6-2007)

2007 Ohio 3454 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2007

Wheat v. Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors (July 2, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16918; Nibert v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. and Corr , 84 Ohio St.3d 100 , 102-03 , 1998-Ohio-506 , 702 N.E.2d 70 . … In support of its assertion, David May Ministries relies upon Triplett v. Board of Review (1963), 118 Ohio App. 515 , *Page 9 196 N.E.2d 107 , and Moore v.

State v. Scott

2013 Ohio 5875 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2013

.’ {¶35} “The rule in Ohio, as expressed in Griffin v. State (1868), 18 Ohio St. 438; Browning v. State (1929), 120 Ohio St. 62, 165 N.E. 566; and State v. … Id.; see also McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120, 130 S.Ct. 665, 673, 175 L.Ed.2d 582(2010) (reaffirming this standard); State v. Fry, 125 Ohio St.3d 163, 926 N.E.2d 1239, 2010–Ohio–1017, ¶ 146; State v.

Red Hill Farm Trust v. Schregardus

102 Ohio App. 3d 90 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1995

CECOS Internatl., Inc. v. Shank (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 1, 6 , 606 N.E.2d 973, 977 ; see R.C. 3745.05. … Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 79, 83 , 526 N.E.2d 786, 789-790 ; State ex rel. Schaefer v. Montgomery Cty.

Northwood Home Owners Assn. v. Zanesville, Ct2007-0016 (12-26-2007)

2007 Ohio 6996 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2007

The court affirmed both decisions of the Board of Zoning Appeals. {¶ 11} In Henley v. … See Smith v. Granville Twp. Bd. of Trustees (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 608 , 612 , 693 N.E.2d 219 , 223 , citing Dudukovich v. Lorain Metro. Hous.

In Re Pachin

50 Ohio App. 3d 44 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1988

Subsequently, the children services board sought permanent custody. … Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 279 , 8 O.O. 3d 261, 376 N.E. 2d 578 .

Gaither-Thompson v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

176 Ohio App. 3d 493 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 30, 2008

V. Summary {¶ 24} We hold that the common pleas court did not abuse its discretion in holding that the board’s decision was supported by substantial, reliable, and probative evidence. … C-990200, 2000 WL 43707 ; Hi Rise, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 151, 153 , 665 N.E.2d 707 . 6 . Pons v. Ohio State Med.

T.D. v. C.N.

113 N.E.3d 123 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 10, 2018

Vega v. Tomas, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 104647, 2017-Ohio-298, ¶ 10, citing Lewis v. Jacobs, 2d Dist. … Vega at ¶ 9, citing Eastley v.

Village of Mogadore v. Summit County Budget Commission

36 Ohio App. 3d 42 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1987

The Board of Tax Appeals held that, because Mogadore was not appealing pursuant to R.C. 5747.55, it was required to name as appellees every participating subdivision in accordance with Brooklyn v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Rather, under R.C. 5747.55, only those subdivisions which the appealing party believes were allocated an excessive share of the fund need be named as parties. * * *” Berea City School Dist. v.

State ex rel. Shine v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., Chambers-Smith, Dir.

2021 Ohio 4459 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 2021

LeRoy v. … Marsh v.

Katz v. Department of Liquor Control

76 Ohio Law. Abs. 129 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1956

The right to such an appeal is purely statutory, Corn v. Board of Liquor Control, 160 Oh St 9, and if the Board has such a right it exists only by virtue of §119.12 R. C. … The record discloses that this appeal does not involve the constitutionality or construction of any statute or rule of the Board but it relates solely to the sufficiency of the evidence.

Scott v. Kindred Transitional Care & Rehab.

2016 Ohio 495 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 2016

Ohio State Bar Assn. v. … v.