Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.16s

  • State v. Eckard

    2016 Ohio 5174 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 2016

    Littlejohn, 2015-Ohio-875, at ¶ 37, citing State v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98881, 2013-Ohio-2690, ¶ 30 and State v. Collins, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98350, 2013-Ohio-488, ¶ 19. … Brown at ¶ 31, 35 (concluding that Brown’s convictions were based on sufficient evidence because his DNA profile was the major contributor to the DNA profile discovered on a shirt connected to the crimes even though the

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • McVey v. Reichley

    105 Ohio App. 319 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1957

    See Connelly v. Morris, 69 Ohio Law Abs., 395 , 125 N. E. (2d), 765. The question of nuisance being eliminated by stipulation, eases involving nuisances are not applicable. The plaintiff relies on the case of Pritz v. … The discretion of the board will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion. See McCloud v. Woodmansee, Bldg. Commr., 165 Ohio St., 271 , 135 N. E. (2d), 316. d.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Barga v. St. Paris Village Council

    212 N.E.3d 396 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2023

    In Angerman, the appellant argued that the State Medical Board violated § 121.22, thus invalidating the board's decision to revoke appellant's medical license, because the board's deliberations were not conducted in a … V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority v. Griffin

    62 Ohio App. 3d 516 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1991

    In 1988-1989, Adrine and Adorno successfully defended against criminal prosecution in State v. Adrine, case No. CR-228949, and State v. *518 Adorno, case Nos. … Board approval of a misapplication of public funds can result in personal liability to the individual board members approving said expenditure.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Krafty v. Firelands Community Hosp., Unpublished Decision (9-28-2007)

    2007 Ohio 5302 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2007

    Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 711 . … Id. quoting Ramage v.

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • State v. McPherson

    2020 Ohio 2758 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2020

    Deputy Brown testified that it Washington App. … State v. Brown, 4th Dist. Athens No. 09CA3, 2009-Ohio-5390, ¶ 24, citing State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 387, 678 N.E.2d 541.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. McLemore

    2011 Ohio 1980 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2011

    State v. Bradley, Champaign App. No. 06CA31, 2008-Ohio-720, ¶2, quoting Columbus v. … Brown, 99 Ohio St.3d 323, 2003-Ohio-3931. {¶ 7} In Brown, the Supreme Court held that Section 14, Article 1 of the Ohio Constitution provides greater protection than the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Thompson

    2022 Ohio 2438 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2022

    The house was boarded up, but he could see a light on through a gap between one of the boards and the window. The front door was boarded shut, but the back door was not. … State v. Brown, 115 Ohio St.3d 55, 2007-Ohio-4837, 873 N.E.2d 858, ¶ 39, citing United States v. Agurs , 427 U.S. 97, 111, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Messner v. Beals

    16 Ohio Law. Abs. 506 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1934

    the board or Rutherford. … Terminal Co. v Cincinnati, 93 Oh St 108, and Local Teleph. Co. v Cranberry Mut. Teleph. Co., 102 Oh St 524).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Lowman Lumber Co., 22398 (1-9-2009)

    2009 Ohio 63 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2009

    circumstances: {¶ 11} "* * * {¶ 12} "(4) If, acting with the kind of culpability otherwise required for the commission of the offense, its commission was authorized, requested, commanded, tolerated, or performed by the board … We disagree. {¶ 18} In Patterson v. V M Auto Body (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 573 , 589 N.E.2d 1306 , the plaintiff brought suit against V M Auto Body, a sole proprietorship owned by an individual, Victor Searfoss.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Leakas Furriers, Inc. v. Bowers

    98 Ohio App. 337 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1954

    Nu-Tred Tire Co., v. … This distinction was made by the Board of Tax Appeals in the case of Black, d. b. a. Black Furs, v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chudzinski v. City of Sylvania

    53 Ohio App. 2d 151 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 14, 1976

    Brown, P. J., and Potter, J., concur. 1 Notes, Ohio Surface Water Rights, 38 Cincinnati L. Rev. 525 (1969). 2 See the discussion of Persin v. … University of Utah (1971), 26 Utah 2d 285 , 488 P. 2d 741 ; Keys V. Romley (1966), 64 C. 2d 396, 412 P. 2d 529 ; Baer v. Board (1969), 255 Md. 163 , 257 A. 2d 201 ; Wells v. State Highway Comm. (Mo. 1973), 503 S.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Ray v. Warren

    2019 Ohio 4654 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2019

    Temple v. Wean United, Inc., 50 Ohio St.2d 317, 327 (1977), citing Civ.R. 56(C).” Sabino v. Liberty Health Care Ctr., 11th Dist. … Byer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Borgerding v. City of Dayton

    91 Ohio App. 3d 96 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1993

    Bd. v. Ioannidis (June 18, 1987), Allen App. No. 1-86-52, unreported, 1987 WL 13130 ; In re Brackett (May 1, 1990), Montgomery App. No. 11799, unreported, 1990 WL 56898 . See, also, Dudukovich v. Lorain Metro. … Morris Co. v. Foley Constr. Co. (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 279 , 8 O.O.3d 261 , 376 N.E.2d 578 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pavlic v. Garland Floor Co.

    14 Ohio App. 3d 297 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1984

    Pavlic v. Garland Floor Co. (Feb. 9, 1983), Summit App. No. 10816, unreported. On March 2, 1983, claimant filed with the trial court an amended notice of appeal and mailed a copy to the board. … appeal has been received by the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Howard v. City Loan & Savings Co.

    31 Ohio App. 3d 193 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1986

    Whit-acre (“Whitacre”) and Vella Brown (“Brown”) (together referred to as “ap-pellees”), and dismissing appellants’ *194 claim against appellees for invasion of privacy. … See, also, Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc. (1974), 215 Kan. 814 , 529 P. 2d 104 , relied on by the trial court. This requires a factual determination.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jeffers v. Jeffers, 07 Be 36 (6-24-2008)

    2008 Ohio 3339 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2008

    Brown v. Executive 200, Inc. (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 250 , 253 . Civil and criminal contempt proceedings can be distinguished by the purpose and character of the punishment meted out. Carroll v. … Pugh v. Pugh (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 136 , 139 , quoting Brown at 253.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Pace v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections

    2013 Ohio 1376 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2013

    Troy v. … Stern v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edmond v. Keller

    5 Ohio App. 2d 248 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1965

    board to it. … See Parker v. Young, Admr., 172 Ohio St. 464 ; and Starr v. Young, Admr., 172 Ohio St. 317 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of It Corp.

    61 Ohio App. 3d 470 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1989

    This court will not substitute its judgment for that of the board, especially in areas of administrative expertise. Dudukovich v. … See Perez v. Campbell (1971), 402 U.S. 637, 649-652 , 91 S.Ct. 1704, 1711-1712 , 29 L.Ed.2d 233, 242-244 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.