Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.97s
Board of Educ. v. Gbr Indus. Park, Unpublished Decision (3-18-2005)
2005 Ohio 1351 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2005
. {¶ 2} This is an appropriation action brought by plaintiff-appellee, the Bridgeport Exempted Village School District Board of Education, involving a large tract of land in Bridgeport owned by appellants. … Citing, Wray v. Allied Indus. Development Corp., 7th Dist. No. 01-CA-188, 2002-Ohio-5214 ; Burke v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedColson v. Ohio State Department of Commerce
26 Ohio App. 3d 67 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1985
As this court stated in Weisenberger v. Auditor (Jan. 28,1982), No. 81AP-607, unreported, there is no right of appeal to the common pleas court from a reduction in position. … It necessarily follows that that section does not afford appellant a remedy of appeal to the Court of'Common Pleas from the order of the State Personnel Board of Review since appellant’s attempted appeal to that board was
Cited 1 timesPublished5 Ohio App. 2d 248 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1965
board to it. … See Parker v. Young, Admr., 172 Ohio St. 464 ; and Starr v. Young, Admr., 172 Ohio St. 317 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ames v. Troy Twp. Bd. of Trustees
2024 Ohio 1647 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 2024
Ames v. Troy Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 2024-Ohio-1647.] … Sands v. Culotta, 165 Ohio St.3d 172, 2021-Ohio-1137, 176 N.E.3d 735, ¶ 8, quoting Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRed Hill Farm Trust v. Schregardus
102 Ohio App. 3d 90 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1995
CECOS Internatl., Inc. v. Shank (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 1, 6 , 606 N.E.2d 973, 977 ; see R.C. 3745.05. … Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 79, 83 , 526 N.E.2d 786, 789-790 ; State ex rel. Schaefer v. Montgomery Cty.
Cited 9 timesPublishedVadala v. Trumbull Cty. Sheriff
2013 Ohio 5078 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 2013
Rohde v. Farmer (1970), 23 Ohio St.2d 82, * * *.” (Parallel citations omitted.) Barr v. Harrison Cty. Common Pleas Court, 10th Dist. … Our Place, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority v. Griffin
62 Ohio App. 3d 516 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1991
In 1988-1989, Adrine and Adorno successfully defended against criminal prosecution in State v. Adrine, case No. CR-228949, and State v. *518 Adorno, case Nos. … Board approval of a misapplication of public funds can result in personal liability to the individual board members approving said expenditure.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHelton v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp.
2015 Ohio 3570 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2015
Fisher v. Mayfield, 30 Ohio St.3d 8 (1987), paragraph one of the syllabus; Brown v. Liebert Corp., 10th Dist. … Id.; see Brown at ¶ 11, citing Gdovichin v. Geauga Cty. Hwy.
Cited 1 timesPublished2014 Ohio 4927 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2014
Ohio v. Brown, 432 U.S. 161, 165, 97 S.Ct. 2221, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). … Johnson at ¶ 49, citing State v. Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d 447, 2008-Ohio-4569, 895 N.E.2d 149, ¶ 50 (Lanzinger , J., concurring).
Cited 3 timesPublishedGaither-Thompson v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission
176 Ohio App. 3d 493 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 30, 2008
V. Summary {¶ 24} We hold that the common pleas court did not abuse its discretion in holding that the board’s decision was supported by substantial, reliable, and probative evidence. … C-990200, 2000 WL 43707 ; Hi Rise, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 151, 153 , 665 N.E.2d 707 . 6 . Pons v. Ohio State Med.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMaurer v. Wayne Cty. Bd. of Cty. Commrs.
2015 Ohio 5318 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2015
Zimmerman v. … Harris-Coker v. Abraham, 9th Dist.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHolmes v. Republic Steel Corp.
84 Ohio App. 442 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1948
Missouri River Co. v. Richards, 8 Kan. 76 , 81; Rogers v. Railway Co. 22 Minn. 25, 27 ; Railroad Co v. Tiernan *206 (Kan. Supp) 15 Pac 544 , 553; Stewart v. Railroad Co. 41 Fed. 736, 739 ; Rosborough v. … No formal action by the board' was’necessary. It is sufficient if there was a clear and well-defined understanding. Chabot & Richard v. Richard, 109 Me. 403 , 84 A. 892 ; Young v. U. S. Mtge & Tr. Co. 214 N.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ohio Attorney General v. LG Development Corp.
187 Ohio App. 3d 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2010
Brown v. Dayton Malleable, Inc. (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 151, 157 , 1 OBR 185, 438 N.E.2d 120 , and State v. Tri-State Group, Inc., 7th Dist. No. 03 BE 61, 2004-Ohio-4441 , 2004 WL 1882567 , ¶ 103. … Brown v. Dayton Malleable, Inc., or the court’s consideration of such evidence, State ex rel. Petro v. Maurer Mobile Home Court, Inc., 6th Dist. No. WD-06-053, 2007-Ohio-2262 , 2007 WL 1378611 , ¶ 62.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCaptain Frank's, Inc. v. Limbach
76 Ohio App. 3d 438 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1991
PPG Industries v. Kosydar (1981), 65 Ohio St.2d 80 , 19 O.O.3d 268 , 417 N.E.2d 1385 . … Wilson v. Lindley (Dec. 27, 1983), Franklin App. No. 83 AP-335, unreported, 1983 WL 3848 ; see, also, Westwood Constr. Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished105 Ohio App. 319 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1957
See Connelly v. Morris, 69 Ohio Law Abs., 395 , 125 N. E. (2d), 765. The question of nuisance being eliminated by stipulation, eases involving nuisances are not applicable. The plaintiff relies on the case of Pritz v. … The discretion of the board will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion. See McCloud v. Woodmansee, Bldg. Commr., 165 Ohio St., 271 , 135 N. E. (2d), 316. d.
Cited 8 timesPublishedState ex rel. Pace v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections
2013 Ohio 1376 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2013
Troy v. … Stern v.
Cited 0 timesPublished1st National Bank v. Mountain Agency, LLC, Ca2008-05-056 (5-11-2009)
2009 Ohio 2202 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 11, 2009
Proffitt v. Plymesser (June 25, 2001), Brown App. No. CA2000-04-008, at 2-3, quoting Trattar v. Rausch (1950), 154 Ohio St. 286 , paragraph one of the syllabus. … Blakemore v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Northeast Property Owners Civic Ass'n, Inc. v. Kennedy
117 Ohio App. 79 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1961
Article V, Section I of the constitution provides: "A regular meeting for the transaction of business shall be held on such day, or days, and at such hour as may be directed by the By-Laws." … Atty., v.
Cited 3 timesPublished149 Ohio App. 3d 164 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 2002
In State v. … Gooding v.
Cited 1 timesPublished2021 Ohio 927 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2021
Hillman v. Brown, 10th Dist. No. 17AP-836, 2018-Ohio-2409, ¶ 4, quoting State ex rel. Stanley v. D'Apolito, 7th Dist. … Hillman v. Brown, 10th Dist. No. 17AP-836, 2018-Ohio-2409, ¶ 4- 5, citing State ex rel. Stanley v. D'Apolito, 7th Dist. No. 12MA218, 2013-Ohio-428, ¶ 8, citing State ex rel. Grove v. Nadel, 84 Ohio St.3d 252-53 (1998).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna