Case law

Anderson v. Wolf

17 Ohio Law. Abs. 161 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1934

The conclusion is irresistible that these facts were known to the School Board attempting to hire him and also were known to the Board of Examiners before whom he had presented himself. … The reasoning of the court is expressed in the syllabus and opinion in case of School District No. 2 v Dilman, 22 Oh St 194.

Thelander v. City of Cleveland

3 Ohio App. 3d 86 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1981

Nimon, v. … Since the proceeding before the Board of Control was not “quasi-judicial,” M. J. Kelley Co. v.

Williams v. Ohio Dept. of Edn.

2011 Ohio 6615 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2011

Blakemore v. … Blakemore v.

State v. Tolbert

2015 Ohio 4733 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2015

Brown at ¶ 12, citing United States v. … See State v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2224, 992 N.E.2d 1172, ¶ 37 (5th Dist.), and cases cited there. Therefore, Staats’s subjective belief that the warrant was valid was also objectively reasonable.

McGill v. McGill

3 Ohio App. 3d 455 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1982

As noted in Brown v. … See Culberson v. Culberson (1978), 60 Ohio App. 2d 304 [ 14 O.O.3d 265 ]; see, also, Brown v. Brown (1972), 31 Colo.

State ex rel. Maynard v. Medina Cty. Facilities Taskforce Subcommittee

2020 Ohio 5561 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2020

Whaley v. Franklin Cty. … Leneghan v. Husted, 154 Ohio St.3d 60, 2018-Ohio-3361, 110 N.E.3d 1275, ¶ 17, quoting Inskeep v. Burton, 2d Dist. Champaign No. 2007-CA-11, 2008-Ohio-1982, ¶ 17; Greer v.

In Re P.J., 2008-A-0047 (1-16-2009)

2009 Ohio 182 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2009

("Children Services Board"). … Santosky v.

Leveque 41, L.L.C. v. Leveque Tower Condominium Assn., Inc.

2025 Ohio 2055 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2025

, and Tower 10 owns 17 condo units and appointed one board member. … or a decision by the Board.

Silver v. Jewish Home of Cincinnati

190 Ohio App. 3d 549 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2010

Subsequently, counsel for Jewish Home briefly questioned appellant about the board member. … Rogan v. Brown, Clinton App. No. CA2005-10-025, 2006-Ohio-5508 , 2006 WL 3003971 , ¶ 30. {¶ 91} We find that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury as to aggravation. First, based on Dr.

State ex rel. Culver v. Indus. Comm.

2024 Ohio 1138 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2024

Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 37 Ohio St.3d 162 (1988). … Scott v. Indus.

Meminger v. Ohio State Univ.

102 N.E.3d 642 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2017

No. 2016-00808) v. … " In Smith v.

State ex rel. Stemp v. Faust

7 Ohio Law. Abs. 549 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1929

They further urge in the brief filed that under 7684 GC. the Board had acted. … The Supreme Court in the case of State v.

Miami Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. Peck

99 Ohio App. 60 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1954

In the written opinion of the attorney examiner of the board, many of the factors were considered which appellant contended supported its return. W. L. Harper Co. v. Peck, Tax Commr., and Richter Transfer Co. v. … We recognize the limitation upon our authority to hold that the decision of the board is unreasonable, and that we may not substitute our judgment for that of the board; Fair Store Co. v.

In Re Allen

10 Ohio App. 2d 120 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2, 1967

Cope v. Campbell, 175 Ohio St. 475 . The juvenile can claim only the fundamental due process right to fair treatment. Kent v. United States, 383 U. S. 541 , at page 555, 16 L. Ed 2d 84, 86 S. C. 1045. … The evidence is clear that he did not hold the girl while Luke Brown had intercourse with her. In fairness to the defendant on the specific charge, the case should be remanded to the trial judge.

Slingluff v. State Medical Board of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (7-11-2006)

2006 Ohio 3556 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2006

University of Cincinnati v. … Roy v. Ohio State Med. Bd. (1992), 80 Ohio App.3d 675 , 680 .

State v. Roaden

98 Ohio App. 3d 500 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1994

Texas v. Brown (1983), 460 U.S. 730, 737-739 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1540-1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 510-512 ; State v. … Brown, supra, 460 U.S. *504 at 738, 103 S.Ct. at 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 511 . Plain view alone is never enough to justify the warrantless seizure of evidence. Coolidge v.

Madison Seed Co. v. Tax Commissioner

27 Ohio App. 3d 282 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1985

Both appellee and the board rely on the case of Gressel v. … Material & Fuel Co. v.

Immke Circle Leasing v. Bur. of Motor Veh., Unpublished Decision (8-15-2006)

2006 Ohio 4227 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2006

Ohio State Bd. of Pharmacy v. Frantz (1990), 51 Ohio St.3d 143 , 146 ; McCutcheon v. Ohio State Med. … Brown and McGrath, JJ., concur. 1 In essence, the Notice alleged that Immke sold new cars for which it did not have a contract or agreement with the manufacturer to sell, and it solicited sales through persons other than

Colwell v. Hamilton County Anglers, Ca2006-10-082 (9-10-2007)

2007 Ohio 4644 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 2007

Doe v. … See *Page 5 Maier v. Serv-All Maintenance, Inc. (1997), 124 Ohio App.3d 215 . 1 {¶ 14} The board members testified that, following the meeting, that they did not believe Albert would injure Colwell.

Smith v. Warren Cty. Rural Zoning Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2019 Ohio 1590 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2019

Nunamaker v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 2 Ohio St.3d 115, 118 (1982). … A board of zoning appeals' decision is presumed to be valid and the burden is upon the party contesting the board's determination to prove otherwise. Terrace Park v. Anderson Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 1st Dist.