Case law

Haban v. Suburban Home Mortgage Co.

40 Ohio Law. Abs. 78 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1943

Clark v Hubbard, 8 Ohio 382 ; Allegheny Oil Co. v Snyder, 12 O. F. D. 227. However, in Clark v Hubbard, supra, the.court expressly found that the defendant, the cross-petitioner, was in actual possession of the land. … Ellithorpe v Buck, 17 Oh St 72. In Stone v Perkins, (Mo.), 117 S. W. 717 , cited in 117 L. R. A., page 29, it was held that: .

Johnson v. Aultman Hosp.

2018 Ohio 1268 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2018

Craddock v. Flood Co., 9th Dist. … Hahn v.

Carlin v. Reminderville

2025 Ohio 1435 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 2025

[Cite as Carlin v. Reminderville, 2025-Ohio-1435.] … Davis v. Pub. Emps.

State v. Shalash

2014 Ohio 2584 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2014

In Kumho Tire Co. v. … Id. at 150 (internal marks omitted). {¶ 39} In United States v. Brown, 279 F.Supp.2d 1238 (S.D.

Kettering City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Revision

2018 Ohio 2325 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2018

Thus, when the board of revision adopts a new value based on an owner’s evidence, the burden of going forward shifts to the board of education on appeal to the BTA. Id. … Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, 150 Ohio St.3d 527, 2017-Ohio-4415, 83 N.E.3d 916, ¶ 7; Dublin City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty.

Agler v. Schine Theatrical Co.

59 Ohio App. 68 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1938

Village of Lebanon v Schwartz, 4 Oh Ap 173 at pages 175 and 176. … Brooklyn Street Railroad Company v Kelley, 6 C. C. 155. The first assignment of error is therefore without merit. 2.

Citizens for Choice v. Summit County Council

143 Ohio App. 3d 823 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 9, 2001

San Filipo v. San Filipo (1991), 81 Ohio App.3d 111, 112 , 610 N.E.2d 493, 493 , citing State v. Ellington (1987), 36 Ohio App.3d 76, 77-78 , 521 N.E.2d 504, 505-506 . … Kahle v. Rupert (1918), 99 Ohio St. 17 , 122 N.E. 39 . See, also, Lynn v. Supple (1957), 166 Ohio St. 154 , 140 N.E.2d 555 , paragraph two of syllabus.

State Ex Rel. Riehl v. Malone

94 Ohio App. 3d 448 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1994

“board of elections”). … “V.

State v. Davis

2013 Ohio 3878 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2013

Brown No. … State v.

Marinchek v. Brunswick Civil Service Commission

20 Ohio App. 3d 247 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1984

Appellants are school bus drivers for Brunswick City School District Board of Education. For economic reasons, the board purported to abolish all existing bus driver routes and positions. … The employees appealed to the State Personnel Board of Review which found no reduction in pay had occurred. The employees appealed the decision to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County which affirmed the board.

Mocznianski v. Ohio Department of Job & Family Services

195 Ohio App. 3d 422 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2011

The order directed the county board to develop a new service plan to meet appellant’s needs. This decision was eventually affirmed in an R.C. 119.12 appeal to the court of common pleas. Mocznianski v. … Co. v. PUCO (1937), 301 *431 U.S. 292 , 57 S.Ct. 724 , 81 L.Ed. 1093 , and United States v. Abilene & S. Ry.

State v. Fields

2021 Ohio 3845 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2021

[Cite as State v. Fields, 2021-Ohio-3845.] … See also State v. Dixon, 2d Dist.

Hindu Soc. of Greater Cincinnati v. Union Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2019 Ohio 2494 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2019

A board of zoning appeals' decision is presumed to be valid and the burden is upon the party contesting the board's determination to prove otherwise. Terrace Park v. Anderson Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 1st Dist. … Public opinion, however, "is not evidence which may be considered when a [board of zoning appeals] is deciding whether to grant a conditional use permit." Angels for Animals, Inc. v. Beaver Twp.

State v. Lee

2026 Ohio 299 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 2026

State v. Bates, 2022-Ohio-475, ¶ 11. … Id., citing State v.

Newton v. Cuyahoga Falls city

15 Ohio Law. Abs. 86 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1933

Johnson v Village of New Concord, supra. … Both boards reported as required by the statutes, and the reports of these boards were confirmed by council.

State ex rel. Gowdy v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

2021 Ohio 3603 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 2021

Gowdy v Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2021-Ohio-3603.] … Russell v. Thornton, 111 Ohio St.3d 409, 2006-Ohio-5858, 856 N.E.2d 966, ¶ 9. State ex rel. Nyamusevya v. Hawkins, Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-1122, ¶ 10.

State v. Hatfield, 2006-A-0033 (12-28-2007)

2007 Ohio 7130 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2007

State v. Brown (1982), 7 Ohio App.3d, 113 , 115 . However, the statement on which appellant's expert relied, was not a fact "necessary for his conviction." … State v.

State v. Palmer

2023 Ohio 1554 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 10, 2023

Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233, 2012-Ohio-2577, 971 N.E.2d 865, ¶ 74; State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton Nos. … Powell at ¶ 74; Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton Nos. C-180236, C- 180237, C-180261 and C-180262, 2019-Ohio-1615, at ¶ 12.

In Re Miller

20 Ohio App. 3d 346 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1984

Miller, appellant, a licensed psychologist in the state of Ohio, was given a notice by the Ohio State Board of Psychology (“board”), appellee, that it intended to determine whether to issue a reprimand or suspend or revoke … Cincinnati v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1917), 96 Ohio St. 270 . While it has been held that the power to revoke a license includes the power to suspend a license (Dworkin v. Pub. Util.

Carpenter v. Sinclair

106 Ohio App. 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1958

This is a companion case to the case of Quinn v. State Board of Real Estate Examiners, 104 Oh Ap 316, 137 N. E. 2d 777 . Both cases were tried upon the- same transcript of testimony taken before the Board. … However, inasmuch as this case is presented to us on the record and the members of the Board having seen and heard the witnesses, this finding of fact by the Board is entitled to receive great weight upon this review.