Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.46s

  • In re D.B.

    2016 Ohio 5558 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2016

    CALIFORNIA. {¶ 17} In her second assignment of error, Mother cites to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Anders v. … See, e.g., State v. Lamb, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 12 MA 224, 2013-Ohio-5683, ¶ 23-26 (concluding that "hybrid briefs are inappropriate and that Anders assignments of error should be struck"); State v. Vaughn, 2d Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Durham Ridge Invests., L.L.C. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2021 Ohio 2454 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 2021

    Id. at 27. {¶16} In Plain Local Schools Board of Education v. … In Musto v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Finney v. Akron City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

    2024 Ohio 1203 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2024

    [Cite as Finney v. Akron City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 2024-Ohio-1203.] … State v. Swisher, 9th Dist. Summit No. 30169, 2023-Ohio-3327, ¶ 5, quoting Boncek v. Stewart, 9th Dist. Summit No. 21054, 2002-Ohio-5778, ¶ 10.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Corron v. Wisner

    23 Ohio App. 2d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1970

    Hudson, Admr., v. Kelley, Sheriff (1936), 55 Ohio App. 314 ; State, ex rel. Homan, v. Board of Embalmers S Funeral Directors of Ohio (1939), 135 Ohio St. 321 ; State, ex rel. Merydith Const. Co., v. … Park Investment Co., v. Board of Tax Appeals (1964), 175 Ohio St. 410 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Dulay

    94 N.E.3d 1167 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 2017

    [Cite as Cohen v. Dulay, 2017-Ohio-6973.] … Bear v. Bear, 9th Dist.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hammonds v. Beavercreek City Schools

    182 N.E.3d 34 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2021

    Harless v. … E.g., Cameron v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Karun v. State, Department of Liquor Control

    81 Ohio Law. Abs. 509 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1959

    Neither the motion to rehear nor appellant’s brief on appeal supplies any reason to change in anywise the Board’s findings (Wallace v. Board, L. C. R., 1037) or penalty. … The fourth assignment of error relates to the refusal of the Board to grant a rehearing. This is based upon the alleged failure to follow the provisions of Regulation No. 61 of the Board of Liquor Control.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Indiana Insurance v. Carnegie Construction Co.

    91 Ohio App. 3d 286 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 1993

    Second, Carnegie relies on the balancing test set forth in Amato v. Gen. … Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am. (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 17 , 540 N.E.2d 266 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Artists W. Assn. v. Dept. of Liquor Control

    96 Ohio App. 121 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1953

    We have been cited no cases bearing on this question in this state, but a similar one *126 arose in Burke v. Coleman, 356 Mo., 594 , 202 S. W. (2d), 809 . … In Technical Radio Laboratory v. Federal Radio Commission, 36 F. (2d), 111, it was held that the time of the hearing is not controlling as to the making of the question a “moot” one.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Ridley

    154 N.E.3d 462 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 4, 2020

    State v. … State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brunswick Hills Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Ludrosky

    2012 Ohio 2556 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2012

    Hardy v. … To prevail, the Board must show, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant is using his or her property in violation of a zoning ordinance. Azar v. Baughman, 9th Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Greene County Dept. of Job v. Public Emps. Retire., 07ap-421 (2-19-2008)

    2008 Ohio 642 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2008

    Having failed to raise this issue before the retirement board or the trial court, appellants have forfeited the right to appeal it here. See Moyer's Auto Wrecking, Inc. v. … No. 3-01-19 (failure to raise issue *Page 7 before board or trial court constitutes waiver on appeal); Gamad v. State Med. Bd. (Oct. 14, 1993), Franklin App.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ray v. Wilmington College

    106 Ohio App. 3d 707 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1995

    Allen v. … See Koblitz v. W. Res.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • McDerment v. McDerment

    2019 Ohio 2609 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2019

    Brown had failed to do the job he was hired to do, we find nothing in the record indicating that Mr. … Hill v. Hill, 9th Dist.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fairland Assn. of Classroom Teachers v. Fairland Local Bd. of Edn.

    2017 Ohio 1098 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2017

    Cleveland v. … Ramsdell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cullen v. Milligan

    79 Ohio App. 3d 138 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 1992

    Perkins v. Quaker City (1956), 165 Ohio *141 St. 120, 59 O.O. 151 , 133 N.E.2d 595 , syllabus. The trial court also retains broad discretion when framing the terms of an injunctive order. Superior Sav. Assn. v. … Garono v. State (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 171, 173 , 524 N.E.2d 496, 498-499 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cross v. Univ. of Toledo

    199 N.E.3d 699 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2022

    See Reed Estate v. Hadley, 4th Dist. … Howland v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Monroe v. Petition for Relief From Firearms Disability

    2025 Ohio 5048 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2025

    State v. Brown, 2011-Ohio-5676, ¶ 17 (8th Dist.). An abuse of discretion occurs when a court exercises “its judgment, in an unwarranted way, in regard to a matter over which it has discretionary authority.” … Abdullah v. Johnson, 2021-Ohio-3304, ¶ 35. An abuse of discretion “‘implies that the court’s attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.’” W.A.F.P., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Bennett

    2019 Ohio 4363 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2019

    [Cite as Bennett v. Bennett, 2019-Ohio-4363.] … Brown Brian Kruse Hon. Timothy D. Wood

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gilliam v. Frigidaire Division, General Motors Corp.

    115 Ohio App. 551 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 6, 1961

    American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Glander, Tax Commr., 147 Ohio St., 147 ; Zier v. Bureau of Unemplopment Compensation, 151 Ohio St., 123 ; Zephyr Room, Inc., v. … Bowers, Tax Commr., 164 Ohio St., 287 ; Queen City Valves, Inc., v. Peck, Tax Commr., 161 Ohio St., 579 . In the case of Hovanec v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.