Case law

Morgan v. Ohio State Medical Board, Unpublished Decision (9-7-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1999

Univ. of Cincinnati v. Conrad (1980), 63 Ohio St.2d 108 , 111 . … Garwood v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio (1998), 127 Ohio App.3d 530 , 533 ; Sicking v. Ohio State Medical Bd. (1991), 62 Ohio App.3d 387 , 395 .

Parsons v. State Board of Psychology, Unpublished Decision (12-22-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1999

Hosp., Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine v. State Emp. Relations Bd . (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 339 , 343 , 587 N.E.2d 835 , 838 . 3 Pons v. Ohio State Med. … See, also, Bottoms Up, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1991), 72 Ohio App.3d 726 , 728 , 596 N.E.2d 475 , 476 . 4 Hawkins v. Marion Corr.

Kuhar v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections, Unpublished Decision (10-18-2006)

2006 Ohio 5427 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2006

Kuhar v. Medina County Board of Elections (2006), 108 Ohio St.3d 515 , 844 N.E.2d 1179 (" Kuhar I "). In Kuhar I, Mr. … Jones v.

Kinsey v. Cleveland Board of Zoning, Unpublished Decision (6-24-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1999

This court's review of the trial court's decision is described in OSWGI L.P. v. North Royalton Board of Zoning Appeals (1996), 113 Ohio App.3d 268 . … Duncan v. Village of Middlefield (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 83 , 86 .

Henley v. Board of Zoning Appeals, Unpublished Decision (6-30-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1999

The trial court affirmed the decision of the Youngstown Board of Zoning Appeals, granting The Beatitude House a permit to operate its program in the former convent building on property owned by the Catholic Diocese of Youngstown … Cash v. Brookshire United Methodist Church (1988), 61 Ohio App.3d 576 ." (Magistrate's Decision filed September 15, 1997, 4).

In re A.L.

2012 Ohio 483 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2012

Cross Truck v. Jeffries (Feb. 10, 1982), Stark App.No. CA-5758. … See, e.g., In re Brown, Summit App.No. 21004, 2002-Ohio-3405, ¶ 9, citing State v. DeHass (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 230, 227 N.E.2d 212.

Board of Trust., Painesville v. Skirtz, Unpublished Decision (2-25-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2000

(See Newbury Township Board of Trustees v. Lomak Petroleum [1992], 62 Ohio St.3d 387 ) . … Board of Bainbridge Twp. Trustees v. Funtime, Inc. (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 106 , 563 N.E.2d 717 , at paragraph one of the syllabus.

Cross v. Univ. of Toledo

199 N.E.3d 699 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2022

See Reed Estate v. Hadley, 4th Dist. … Howland v.

Taylor v. Dayton Bldg & Savings Ass'n

27 Ohio Law. Abs. 598 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1938

Brown, Angie A. Smith, Doris R. Jones and Fidelis Y. Jackson, $15,000 to three and $13,000 to the fourth. … Testimony was given in relation to the meeting of the Board of Directors held on July 14, 1933, in which all members of the board were present, with one exception.

Lockridge Outdoor v. Board of Zoning, Unpublished Decision (10-15-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1999

The Board contends that its interpretation is reasonable and correct. … When a zoning code authorizes an officer or a board to interpret the code, their interpretation will be upheld if it is a reasonable interpretation. Rotellini v.

Atkinson v. Akron Bd. of Edn., Unpublished Decision (3-8-2006)

2006 Ohio 1032 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2006

Viock v. … Temple v.

Stowe v. Regenstein

14 Ohio App. 165 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1921

We hold that the law is as announced by this court in a later decision, that in the case of Brown v. … Having stated our views to the same effect in Brown v. Hayes, supra, we do not deem it necessary to restate the same, but we refer counsel to above cases.

Brazie v. State Bd. of Edn.

2025 Ohio 3000 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2025

In Hamblin v. Trustees of St. Clair Twp., 2024-Ohio-2525 (12th Dist.), a firefighter sought judicial review of the decision of a township’s board of trustees that terminated his employment with a fire department. … Hamblin at ¶ 16, quoting AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v.

State v. Ali

119 Ohio App. 3d 766 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 27, 1997

Prior to the tow of the auto, an inventory search of the vehicle disclosed a brown bag containing $15,040 on the passenger seat. … State v. Golston, supra, 66 Ohio App.3d at 431 , 584 N.E.2d at 1341-1342 ; Chagrin Falls v. Loveman (1986), 34 Ohio App.3d 212, 216 , 517 N.E.2d 1005, 1009-1010 ; State v.

State v. Morgan

104 N.E.3d 941 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 2018

State v. Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery Nos. 24520 & 24705, 2012–Ohio–199, ¶ 13, citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). … State v. Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 21896, 2007– Ohio–6675, ¶ 3. See also State v. Clark, 119 Ohio St.3d 239, 2008–Ohio– 3748, 893 N.E.2d 462, ¶ 27.

State Ex Rel. Scharlotte v. Bd. of Education of East Franklin Local School Dist.

63 Ohio App. 2d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1978

even though the Board had determined otherwise. … Peake, v. Bd. of Edn. (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 119 . Actual written notice will not be required where the teacher deliberately evades the receipt of the written notice of non-renewal. State, ex rel. Curry, v.

Green Local Teachers Assn. v. Blevins

43 Ohio App. 3d 71 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1987

Board of Regents v. Roth (1972), 408 U.S. 564, 569 . … In State v.

State Ex Rel. Hadsell v. Springfield Township

92 Ohio App. 3d 256 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1993

Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge. … Caspar v.

Tom's Express, Inc. v. Bowers

83 Ohio Law. Abs. 22 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1959

. * * *” *23 The Tax Commissioner has cited in support of his motion the cases of Goldman v. L. B. Harrison, 156 Oh St 403, and American Culvert-Fabricating Co., v. Glander, Tax Commr., 158 Oh St 351. … Cedar Hill Farms v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 147 Oh St 30, a case dealing with an appeal from the Board to a court, and especially the opinion of Judge Zimmerman at page 36. See also Moore v.

Karun v. State, Department of Liquor Control

81 Ohio Law. Abs. 509 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1959

Neither the motion to rehear nor appellant’s brief on appeal supplies any reason to change in anywise the Board’s findings (Wallace v. Board, L. C. R., 1037) or penalty. … The fourth assignment of error relates to the refusal of the Board to grant a rehearing. This is based upon the alleged failure to follow the provisions of Regulation No. 61 of the Board of Liquor Control.