Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

2.03s

  • State v. Covender

    2012 Ohio 6105 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2012

    Covender contacted the local mental health board to find the records. Once he located them, he was not permitted to review them without A.S.’s permission. … State v. Brown, 8th Dist. No. 95253, 2011-Ohio-1080, ¶ 14 (quoting State v. Stevens, 2d Dist.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Ganley v. Subaru of America, 07ca0092-M (7-21-2008)

    2008 Ohio 3588 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 2008

    Brown v. Dayton (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 245 , 248 . This court has since stated that privity is a somewhat amorphous concept in the context of claim preclusion. Kirkhart v. … Keiper , 101 Ohio St.3d 377 , 2004-Ohio-1496 , at ¶ 8 , citing Brown , 89 Ohio St.3d at 248 . A `mutuality of interest, including an identity of desired result,' might also support a finding of privity. Brown at 248 ."

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Estate of Battle-King v. Heartland of Twinsburg

    2021 Ohio 2267 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 2021

    McCaskey v. Sanford-Brown College, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 97261, 2012-Ohio-1543, ¶ 7. Generally, an abuse of discretion standard applies. Id., citing Milling Away, L.L.C. v. UGP Properties, L.L.C., 8th Dist. … She averred that she is board certified through testing by the Board of Forensic Document Examiners.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mater v. Browning Bros. Amusement Co.

    30 Ohio App. 367 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1928

    Co. v. U. S. Express Co., 105 Ohio St., 331 , 137 N. E., 1 ; Smith v. Freshwater, 4 Ohio App., 335 , 23 C. C. (N. S.), 142, 26 C. … Judge Alphonso Taft, in the case of Globe Rolling Mill v. King & Co., 2 Cin. Sup. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cocon, Inc. v. Botnick Building Co.

    59 Ohio App. 3d 42 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1989

    When the board’s proceedings involve the preparation of the record for all subsequent court proceedings with respect to the claim involved, then only an attorney may represent another before that board. See Goodman v. … Pursuant to R.C. 5715.05, the board of revision must take minutes of all evidence before the board and keep separate records of each complaint.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re N.P

    2016 Ohio 3125 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 23, 2016

    Brown; Mrs. … DIANE V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Behymer

    80 Ohio App. 3d 791 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1992

    The state submits that appellee failed to demonstrate any prejudice and relies on our decision in State v. Brown (Oct. 29, 1990), Clermont App. No. … State v. Packard, supra. See, also, Doggett v. United States (1992), 505 U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 2686, 2692-2694 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520, 529-532 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Workman v. Franklin County District Board, Unpublished Decision (3-27-2001)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2001

    Zurow v. Cleveland (1978), 61 Ohio App.2d 14 , 24 . … Accordingly, appellant's three assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. __________ BROWN, J.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Glover v. Columbus

    2018 Ohio 4743 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2018

    Brown, and Sean L. Walton, for appellees. Argued: Chanda L. Brown. On brief: Zach Klein, City Attorney, Janet R. Hill Arbogast, and Sarah L. Harrell, for appellant. … BROWN, P.J. and DORRIAN, J., concur. _________________

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Davis

    80 Ohio App. 3d 277 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 1992

    State v. Roper (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 212, 213 , 27 OBR 252, 253, 500 N.E.2d 353, 354 ; cf. Middleburg Hts. v. … Maryland v. Buie, supra. See, also, State v. Williams (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 82 , 9 O.O.3d 81 , 377 N.E.2d 1013 ; State v. Jemison (1968), 14 Ohio St.2d 47, 53 , 43 O.O.2d 115, 118 , 236 N.E.2d 538, 541 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati Highway Co. v. Industrial Commission

    70 Ohio App. 2d 41 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1980

    Said decision was vacated by order of the Dayton Regional Board of Review. … Bd. of Edn., v. Johnston (Franklin Co. Ct. of Appeals No. 77AP-910, June 22, 1978), unreported, affirmed (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 132 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Adelman Real Estate Co. v. Gabanic

    109 Ohio App. 3d 689 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1996

    Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 34 , 12 OBR 26, 29, 465 N.E.2d 848, 852 ; Dudukovich v. Lorain Metro. Hous. … As was well stated in Tempo Holding Co. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State v. Redmond

    2026 Ohio 1348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2026

    State v. Pete, 2023-Ohio-4406, ¶ 18 (7th Dist.), quoting State v. Miller, 2012-Ohio-2132, ¶ 7 (3rd Dist.); See State v. Hruby, 2011-Ohio-3848, ¶ 10 (6th Dist.); State v. Brown, 2003-Ohio-1218 (7th Dist.); State v. … Martinez, 2010-Ohio-2007, ¶ 6 (6th Dist.), citing Brown at ¶ 31. See State v. Owens, 2009-Ohio-1508, ¶ 27 (7th Dist.); State v. Hawkins, 2011-Ohio-74, ¶ 4 (8th Dist.).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lucas County Auditor v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    122 Ohio App. 3d 237 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1997

    Auditor v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (Oct. 21, 1996), Lucas C.P. No. 95-3587, that Franklin was an independent contractor, and not an employee of LCCSB. Accordingly, the trial court reversed the board’s decision. … State v. Krutz (1986), 28 Ohio St.3d 36, 38 , 28 OBR 96, 97-98, 502 N.E.2d 210, 211-212 . “It is axiomatic that an unambiguous statute means what it says.” Hakim v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Reaster, Unpublished Decision (7-22-2005)

    2005 Ohio 4022 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 22, 2005

    Goetz testified that they took some pieces of the particle board floor and took swabs from the chair. … State v. Jackson (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 29 , 38 , citing State v. Nicely (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 147 , 150 .

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • V. Bd.

    4 Ohio App. 2d 171 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1965

    In the case of Ohio Contract Carriers Assn., Inc., v. … The powers of the board are specified explicitly in Section 707.16, Revised Code, supra. Paraphrasing the language of Taft, J., in the case of A. DiCillo Sons, Inc., v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fulmer v. W. Licking Joint Fire Dist.

    2014 Ohio 82 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2014

    [Cite as Fulmer v. W. Licking Joint Fire Dist., 2014-Ohio-82.] … Licking County, Case No. 13-CA-36 6 {¶14} In Henley v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hertelendy v. Great Lakes Architectural Serv. Sys., Inc.

    2012 Ohio 4157 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2012

    Irvine v. Unemp. Comp. … See Howard at ¶ 17; Perry v. Buckeye Community Servs., 48 Ohio App.3d 140, 142, 548 N.E.2d 1308 (4th Dist.1988); but see Powell v. Brown Publishing Co., 3d Dist.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Thomas Vending, Inc. v. Slagle, Unpublished Decision (2-3-2000)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2000

    We note, as did the Ninth District Court of Appeals in Brown v. … See Brown, supra; Benson v. City of Akron (Jan. 25, 1999), Summit App. No. 19076, unreported; Carey v. Bosch (Jan. 27, 1999), Summit App. No. 19102, unreported; Burley v. Bibbo, supra.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services

    121 Ohio App. 3d 372 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1997

    See Dixon v. Brown (May 16, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 66931, unreported, 1996 WL 257443 ; Depas v. Highland Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 193 , 6 O.O.3d 421 , 370 N.E.2d 744 . … Co. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.